Time to let things go. Let this man move on with his life.
W
worth t phillips
11 years ago
Speaking as a retired LEO with over 30 years on the job I see no reason to retry officer Kerrick. His actions were clearly within his right to protect himself and others from serious bodily injury. We have wasted enough taxpayer money on a pc trial that never should have occurred in the first place.
E
Eric S. Henson
11 years ago
Officer Kerrick was performing the job that he was trained to do. Both he and his family have endured enough.
R
Rick Riddle
11 years ago
As ret Law Enforcement officer and following the trial, and the jury with a 8 to 4 deadlock, I really think the cost to the tax payers would not worth it. If was 6/to 6 then yes.
M
Mike wren
11 years ago
This was not a race issue!!!!!!
T
Tracy
11 years ago
Should have never been tried in the first place.
R
Robert Martin
11 years ago
No second trial
J
Janet Spencer
11 years ago
The police department tried to make him
A scapegoat. There was not enough evidence for him to be charged.
R
Rebecca Dewese
11 years ago
No retry this officer ...CMPD is using him as an escape goat! Ferrel family will not be happy with any decision other than guilty ... The verdict has been given....
J
Joanne Rettig
11 years ago
I support Officer Merrick.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
This officer was doing his job protecting and serving our community. He has the right to protect himself from grave bodily injury or death. He does not deserve to be retried the jury's decision should be upheld.
H
Hughie Sexton
11 years ago
Not Guilty would have been the most appropriate verdict since Ofc. Randall Kerrick was just doing his job two years ago when this tragedy happened.! No need to try this case again, because the evidence is overwhelmingly supportive of Kerrick's testimony, and the other two officers eye witness account that were there that night too.!
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
you will never find twelve jurors that will agree to convict based on the evidence presented. Stop wasting tax dollars to make a political statement.
T
TOLLIE CROUSE
11 years ago
IF THE GUY WOULD HAVE LISTIN TO THE POLICE AND STOP AND PUT HIS HANDS UP HE WOULD BE A LIVE
V
Vance Thomas
11 years ago
This never should have went to trail the first time. Enough money has been spent pandering to political bullies, please stop the madness.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Justice does not always equal a guilty verdict; it is becoming increasingly difficult for law enforcement to do their jobs.
C
Christina furr
11 years ago
Kerrick is not guilty in my opinion. Should have never been put on trial.
K
K Edmisten
11 years ago
I do not want the Attorney General to retry Officer Kerrick. He was doing his job and I do not feel this would have happened had Ferrell obeyed the officers' commands.
Good job Officer Kerrick !!!!!!!!
Time to let things go. Let this man move on with his life.
Speaking as a retired LEO with over 30 years on the job I see no reason to retry officer Kerrick. His actions were clearly within his right to protect himself and others from serious bodily injury. We have wasted enough taxpayer money on a pc trial that never should have occurred in the first place.
Officer Kerrick was performing the job that he was trained to do. Both he and his family have endured enough.
As ret Law Enforcement officer and following the trial, and the jury with a 8 to 4 deadlock, I really think the cost to the tax payers would not worth it. If was 6/to 6 then yes.
This was not a race issue!!!!!!
Should have never been tried in the first place.
No second trial
The police department tried to make him A scapegoat. There was not enough evidence for him to be charged.
No retry this officer ...CMPD is using him as an escape goat! Ferrel family will not be happy with any decision other than guilty ... The verdict has been given....
I support Officer Merrick.
This officer was doing his job protecting and serving our community. He has the right to protect himself from grave bodily injury or death. He does not deserve to be retried the jury's decision should be upheld.
Not Guilty would have been the most appropriate verdict since Ofc. Randall Kerrick was just doing his job two years ago when this tragedy happened.! No need to try this case again, because the evidence is overwhelmingly supportive of Kerrick's testimony, and the other two officers eye witness account that were there that night too.!
you will never find twelve jurors that will agree to convict based on the evidence presented. Stop wasting tax dollars to make a political statement.
IF THE GUY WOULD HAVE LISTIN TO THE POLICE AND STOP AND PUT HIS HANDS UP HE WOULD BE A LIVE
This never should have went to trail the first time. Enough money has been spent pandering to political bullies, please stop the madness.
Justice does not always equal a guilty verdict; it is becoming increasingly difficult for law enforcement to do their jobs.
Kerrick is not guilty in my opinion. Should have never been put on trial.
I do not want the Attorney General to retry Officer Kerrick. He was doing his job and I do not feel this would have happened had Ferrell obeyed the officers' commands.
Self defense isn't a crime.