Skip to main content

I Support Officer Kerrick

3,555 Comments

J
Judith Deal
11 years ago

Treat all in the thin blue line with appropriate respect. Treat the Kerrick family with respect.

B
barbara
11 years ago

Supporting you all the way

L
Lindy freeman
11 years ago

Officer did his job. When a police officer is sent on a call they never know what they will come across and they have to defend themselves to. Bottom line if a police officer tells you to stop you stop right them. Continue coming at them they deserve whatever office does. Office wants to go home to their families to.

G
Gail Sloan
11 years ago

Off. Kerrick was afraid for his life & the life of the other two officers - I would have done the same thing that he did - he is not guilty !!!

B
Brian gathings
11 years ago

Kerrick was given the job as a cmpd officer because he was believed capable of making honorable and trustworthy judgement calls. He was given a service weapon along with proper training on how and when to use it. He made what he thought was a decision to defend his life against a suspect obviously not complying with police orders. How can you arm a police officer with a service weapon, give him extensive training, and then condemn him for defending a threat to his life? Kerrick should not be retried for this case. He should be given a pat on the back for serving the people of Charlotte, and standing strong in the face of danger.

R
Richard Martin
11 years ago

Please do not waste anymore tax payers dollars retrying Officer Randall Kerrick. He is innocent.

D
Deborah Hudson
11 years ago

I support him completely

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

2/3 of the people have spoken. Do not let a small percentage of the population scare you into an unwinnable trial at taxpayer expense. He is on trial for violation of state law, not department policy.

B
Butch Kegley
11 years ago

I believe Officer Kerrick was doing what he was trained to do. He had to make a split second decision that he believed could cost him his life. The outcome was tragic, but not intentional. The video clearly shows that there was no time to determine if the subject had a weapon or not. Officer Kerrick believed hew as protecting his life as well as those of his fellow officers. The first Grand Jury did not feel that a charge was justified. A trial jury could not come to that conclusion either, with the majority voting for acquittal. Justice has been done. In any trial, one side will not like the outcome. Some people confuse justice with revenge. I believe Officer Kerrick is innocent of manslaughter and should not be retried.

J
Jeff Clark
11 years ago

32 year Law Enforcement Instructor and in my opinion, Kerrick used proper force.

B
Belinda Miller
11 years ago

i back the blue

L
Linda Simpson
11 years ago

I support officer Kerrick and believe he was serving all of us by answering a call from one of us that needed his protection. He fulfilled his obligation as he was sworn to do! He deserves his pay and much respect for a thankless and dangerous job. He was where he was supposed to be doing what he was hired to do ,serve and protect ! Himself included. 2.25 million would not be enough to thank him for risking his life and what he has been through in the past few years. Praying that justice will truly be served .

L
Linda Simpson
11 years ago

I support officer Kerrick and believe he was serving all of us by answering a call from one of us that needed his protection. He fulfilled his obligation as he was sworn to do! He deserves his pay and much respect for a thankless and dangerous job. He was where he was supposed to be doing what he was hired to do ,serve and protect ! Himself included. 2.25 million would not be enough to thank him for risking his life and what he has been through in the past few years. Praying that justice will truly be served .

D
Dawn Biddy
11 years ago

#kerrickstrong

K
Kathie Stussie
11 years ago

I believe he was tried and it should be done. He shouldn't have been tried in the first place. Quit putting innocent police officers on trial just to make a name for yourself.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Officer Kerrick was doing his job. He should NOT have been charged with a crime. This person chose to run at an officer in the darkness of night when asked to stop. He attacked the police officer and the officer has the right to protect his own life. Justice was served!!!!!!

B
Bryan Ritchie
11 years ago

Retrying this case is not efficient use of NC resources. As a 26 year law enforcement veteran I find it absurd Officer Kerrick was ever charged. I find it appalling this case went to 2 Grand Jury hearings because the first would not return a true bill. Do not retry this case...Officer Kerrick is innocent.

R
Reba Creason
11 years ago

Waste of tax payers dollar for a uncalled for trial. Shame on you!!

K
Kathy Turza
11 years ago

I support Law Enforcement and I support Officer Kerrick 100%. The first Grand Jury could not find probable cause to charge him. That should have been the end of it. Stop letting singular groups of people dictate justice. Do not put him and the city through a second trial to placate to those in the streets protesting.

H
hildacjones
11 years ago

lets be fair