Skip to main content

Hurlie substation resubmission objection-Save Our Mearns

434 Comments

C
Chris Tilney
1 year ago

Stop the madness save our countryside this is only lines power companies pockets and harms the climate

G
Gwen Whyte
1 year ago

No pylons

L
Lynn gilbert
1 year ago

Disgusting, no need for this you a ruining the country. And when labour gets kicked out and common sense comes back into play, you should be charged and jailed for criminal offences against our countryside!!!

L
Lillian Sherriffs
1 year ago

We don't need any more of these things in our area

C
Caroline Milne
1 year ago

This would devastate the landscape , with a negative impact to tourism and all the small businesses that go along with that . Not to mention the wild life and bird migration paths

N
Norman Sharp
1 year ago

Object

G
grant ross
1 year ago

Government greed over rural communities - DISGUSTING

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

This Application still does not take into account the adjoining offshore substation developments which are already known and which are the very reason that this Hurlie is proposed. The actual development in total will be three times the area of the Hurlie footprint. A proposal of application for the Bowdun project has just been submitted to Aberdeenshire Council- this should be included in any consideration of this Hurlie application.

H
Helen Clarke
1 year ago

This is a disgrace and should be stopped

J
Jean Webster
1 year ago

I object to this planning application. The development is in the wrong location above a town that is subject to frequent Flooding issues. The planned works can only add to that risk.

P
Peter Webster
1 year ago

I object to this planning application. It is in completely the wrong place n top of a hill outside a town that is subject to frequent flooding issues. This development will severely add to that risk.

J
Julie Morrison
1 year ago

No pylons find a more environmentally beneficially fix that won’t destroy our agricultural land and landscapes. Don’t choose cheapest, easiest, ugliest solution learn from Scandinavian neighbours

B
Bruce Masson
1 year ago

No just No

G
Gemma MacFadyen
1 year ago

Not wanted, not needed. It for nothing but greed or profit. Stop destroying our cherished countryside.

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

I wish to register my agreement with this objection

A
Agnes Robinson
1 year ago

Totally opposed for all reasons stated previously!!

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

I wish to register my agreement with this objection

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

The impact it will have on the area with noise, heavy traffic and destroying the countryside.

S
Sarah Glover
1 year ago

We do not want this!!

K
Karen Nichols
1 year ago

Not appropriately sited. Pylons are old technology. Scotland produces more than needed. This is a gold rush for investors.