Skip to main content

STOP BIG BROTHER FROM DRAMATICALLY RESTRICTING POWERBOATING ON THE LOWER FOX

618 Comments

K
Kimberly Harrington
7 years ago

Let’s make the river safe for everyone!

M
Mike Winn
7 years ago

For memories sake!

R
Ron Bryant
7 years ago

I believe all of us who have a stake in the lower Fox River, including those of us with slips in marinas, should have a say in this proposal.

S
Sergey Osipov
7 years ago

We are water skiing on lower river for 20 years and we enjoy it as is without no wake zones. Let keep in wild as is and not convert it to ‘amusement park’ NO to that plan!

S
Steve Larson
7 years ago

As a riverfront homeowner and avid water skier, safety AND open use are always of paramount concern. Personally open to any conversation, but initial concern is the "mixed" use being touted here, and hope a sensible outcome can be reached without excessive restriction to how the Fox River has ALWAYS been used for - which is powerboat recreation.

J
Jason Bell
7 years ago

As a taxpaying, feepaying homeowner that lives on the lower river, I oppose these changes. Leave good enough alone!

J
Jason Bell
7 years ago

As a taxpaying, feepaying homeowner that lives on the lower river, I oppose these changes. Leave good enough alone!

N
Nancy Nowakowski
7 years ago

Responsible drivers

C
Curtis Shaw
7 years ago

No to the plan

L
Laura Robinson
7 years ago

They will ruin recreational boating for everyone and also ruin people’s home values

P
pat fisher
7 years ago

It's the power boaters that are bringing money to the Fox, One boat could hold 8 to 10 people to walk into a restaurant on the lower fox. A canoe maybe 2, Hello!!!! Move your Ecosystem somewhere else.

D
Doug Klingaman
7 years ago Featured

Power boaters also are the one spending money on Registration fees...paddle boards aren't required. Fuel...patronizing local and on water eaterys....local marinas. Not your business to restrict lawful operation by tax-paying Americans of watercraft.

J
Jill Heyn
7 years ago

This is a ridiculous proposal.. the people who pay the outrageous taxes to live on the waterfront will lose not only in access, but in property values which will affect the revenue of each county. NO NO NO!!!

M
Mitchell Prochnow
7 years ago

The idea of creating “safe zones” throughout the lower fox river is a poor plan as 1) most users/ homeowners expect such traffic and enjoy such environment 2) force boaters into traveling up river and into the lakes to achieve such power boating resulting in an enormous increase in loch usuage ( which already seems to be a slow moving process as is) and essentially relocate “ boater traffic” into a more singulated and populated area. On top of which will further more influence power boaters to “ not so patiently” commute to and from the loch via “ safe zones” ultimately removing the idea of boaters wanting to avoid no wake zones entirely due to the fact that there is no alternative route.

R
Ryan George
7 years ago

I say no to the eco system bill

E
Ellen Kayler
7 years ago

This is an outrage to lower river home owners that pay taxes. It all sounds sneaky and corrupt.

S
Shawn S
7 years ago

I live on the Fox River in St. Charles and I would be absolutley outraged if outside of my house they tried to make it some kind of "safe zone" how ridiculous. Let people use the river at their own risk!

M
Michael Rosengren
7 years ago

This is a joke

P
Peggy s Baker
7 years ago

Rediculous!!!!!!!!!!!!

S
Skip Legenza
7 years ago

If anywhere, plan it south of Algonquin, but stay away. Smacks of Chicago politics.