I assume pedestrians will have to use the bridge to cross the rail line as well? If so, there needs to be access (stairs) to the bridge for pedestrians near the rail line so that one doesn't have to walk too far out of the way to cross the bridge. Pedestrian/cycle only level crossing might be an alternative in addition to bridge for auto traffic.
C
Chris Savage
9 years ago
Logically the practical solution to resolving the southern city congestion which has demonstrably inhibited developers from interest in this area.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
At last! The right answer so long overdue.
T
Trevor Tupper
9 years ago
Impossible to eliminate both level crossings as these are used by around 5,000 pedestrians, cyclists, mobility scooters each day. The proposed bridge would have to meet current Network Rail standards and these allow for future overhead electrification. and would need about another 1 metre of clearance than, say, the current bridge on the A27 at Portfield. Basin Road is too short to provide an acceptable gradient in the rise and fall of a bridge. Any bridge would also need to include a wall each side to shield residential properties from noise and pollution and would be an eyesore.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
This would remove one traffic bottleneck so all to the good
P
Peter Hyde
9 years ago
Seems eminently sensible to me
D
David Wilson
9 years ago
The only practicable way of arranging access to Chichester from the south
A
Alastair Spencer
9 years ago
There can be no satisfactory Southern Gateway until the two level crossings are eliminated. This scheme will do more for Chichester than anything else I can imagine. Spend the money on this rather than vanity project.
M
Matthew Wates
9 years ago
This would make a huge improvement to the traffic flow of Chichester!
P
Peter Arnold
9 years ago
An excellent scheme and worth supporting. The removal of those notorious gates will prevent the gridlock that can prevail all around that area.
B
Bob Wiggins
9 years ago
Fully support . Most important to eliminate level crossings
S
Sean Ahern
9 years ago
I support the Freeflow because it would remove the inherent danger of level crossings, reduce pollution and ease the traffic congestion.
F
Fiona Pitkeathly
9 years ago
Chichester desperately needs traffic improvement schemes - Freeflow is a solution to the horrendous delays caused by the level crossing closures. Get Chichester moving again!
P
Peter Henshaw
9 years ago
An excellent suggestion which our District Council should seriously consider.
V
Vivien Nicklin
9 years ago
I fully support this proposal.
M
Michael Avery
9 years ago
The dangerous time wasting level crossings must close and be replaced with a bridge is the only sensible option..
G
Gail Woolston
9 years ago
Brilliant idea!
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Seems an obvious and sensible scheme. Why was this not proposed by the council I wonder?
C
Carol Smith
9 years ago
District Councillors are urged to consider this alternative please
A
Andrew Wilson
9 years ago
I fully support Freeflow. It is a very sensible and feasible solution to a problem that has blighted Chichester for many many years.
I assume pedestrians will have to use the bridge to cross the rail line as well? If so, there needs to be access (stairs) to the bridge for pedestrians near the rail line so that one doesn't have to walk too far out of the way to cross the bridge. Pedestrian/cycle only level crossing might be an alternative in addition to bridge for auto traffic.
Logically the practical solution to resolving the southern city congestion which has demonstrably inhibited developers from interest in this area.
At last! The right answer so long overdue.
Impossible to eliminate both level crossings as these are used by around 5,000 pedestrians, cyclists, mobility scooters each day. The proposed bridge would have to meet current Network Rail standards and these allow for future overhead electrification. and would need about another 1 metre of clearance than, say, the current bridge on the A27 at Portfield. Basin Road is too short to provide an acceptable gradient in the rise and fall of a bridge. Any bridge would also need to include a wall each side to shield residential properties from noise and pollution and would be an eyesore.
This would remove one traffic bottleneck so all to the good
Seems eminently sensible to me
The only practicable way of arranging access to Chichester from the south
There can be no satisfactory Southern Gateway until the two level crossings are eliminated. This scheme will do more for Chichester than anything else I can imagine. Spend the money on this rather than vanity project.
This would make a huge improvement to the traffic flow of Chichester!
An excellent scheme and worth supporting. The removal of those notorious gates will prevent the gridlock that can prevail all around that area.
Fully support . Most important to eliminate level crossings
I support the Freeflow because it would remove the inherent danger of level crossings, reduce pollution and ease the traffic congestion.
Chichester desperately needs traffic improvement schemes - Freeflow is a solution to the horrendous delays caused by the level crossing closures. Get Chichester moving again!
An excellent suggestion which our District Council should seriously consider.
I fully support this proposal.
The dangerous time wasting level crossings must close and be replaced with a bridge is the only sensible option..
Brilliant idea!
Seems an obvious and sensible scheme. Why was this not proposed by the council I wonder?
District Councillors are urged to consider this alternative please
I fully support Freeflow. It is a very sensible and feasible solution to a problem that has blighted Chichester for many many years.