Roundabouts, especially that many in so few miles, will make a heavily traveled road even more dangerous. I am in favor of a center turn lane.
C
Curt Cline
8 years ago
Hwy 64W is inadequate for current traffic levels. I do not support increasing traffic volume with the addition of a high density development.
S
Sharon Nunnelee
8 years ago
This potential development appears to be a "quick-to-jump" proposition from the developer, who hopes to push it through ASAP, with little to no patience for appropriate planning, minimal attention to due diligence, and no concern for the environment or legal real estate restrictions.
D
Dennis Murphy
8 years ago
I am strongly opposed to the Arcadia Views development because it is not in keeping with the existing neighborhood development and will severely (and dangerously) impact traffic on US 64 West.
P
Priscilla B Wilson
8 years ago
What dumb ideas...
Outsiders want to turn this area into
another nightmare...
Go from 64W over the Mtn to 191
Duh!
D
Darlene Harvie
8 years ago
We live in the subdivision that will MOST be affected by this. Nobody knows how to navigate roundabouts, and it would be a serious danger to install them on 64 West. I am OPPOSED to roundabouts. Thank you.
M
Margaret Brann
8 years ago
I can think of no good reason to proceed with either of these two proposals, which will cause major disruption and loss of property both private and commercial.
D
Dale Kirschbaum
8 years ago
Featured
round a bouts are totally unneeded turn lanes would be totally sufficient round a bouts will back traffic up I drive truck and have seen many round a bouts some good and some bad I can say with confidence that this is a bad idea and will cause major traffic problems
W
WILLIAM DEROSA
8 years ago
64 can't handle the traffic of a new development and traffic circles are not the answer
B
Brynn Francis
8 years ago
64W is congested as is. Please do not allow a high density neighborhood to add to the existing traffic issue as well as affect our home values.
S
Sharon Shields
8 years ago
Please reconsider this ridiculous development plan.
L
Linda Hoyle Callahan
8 years ago
Having almost been killed at the entrance to Heathcote more than one time, I do not want more problems in this congested area.
R
Randall W Carnahan
8 years ago
Widening is needed. Roundabouts are not needed. Install traffic lights at the busiest intersections if traffic measurements demand them.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
US64 is dangerous as is, need 3 lanes!
A
Arleen Slagle
8 years ago
We do not need middle lanes for turning in front of Hunters Crossing or sugnals. This will make everything very difficult. If it's not broken dont fix. it. Arleen Slagle
S
Sharon Broussard
8 years ago
They also must know we are NOT looking to have our beloved, historic road turned into a freeway into suburban sprawl. Keep 64W Country is our slogan.......all the way to Etowah and Brevard.
E
Ellen Brazauskas
8 years ago
I am very concerned about the use of roundabouts in our community.
S
Susane Brown
8 years ago
No roundabouts or solid contact continuous barrier. No driving out of business the seven affected businesses on 64 West @ Laurel Park. We need not need middle turn lanes and signals!
oppose
oppose
Roundabouts, especially that many in so few miles, will make a heavily traveled road even more dangerous. I am in favor of a center turn lane.
Hwy 64W is inadequate for current traffic levels. I do not support increasing traffic volume with the addition of a high density development.
This potential development appears to be a "quick-to-jump" proposition from the developer, who hopes to push it through ASAP, with little to no patience for appropriate planning, minimal attention to due diligence, and no concern for the environment or legal real estate restrictions.
I am strongly opposed to the Arcadia Views development because it is not in keeping with the existing neighborhood development and will severely (and dangerously) impact traffic on US 64 West.
What dumb ideas... Outsiders want to turn this area into another nightmare... Go from 64W over the Mtn to 191 Duh!
We live in the subdivision that will MOST be affected by this. Nobody knows how to navigate roundabouts, and it would be a serious danger to install them on 64 West. I am OPPOSED to roundabouts. Thank you.
I can think of no good reason to proceed with either of these two proposals, which will cause major disruption and loss of property both private and commercial.
round a bouts are totally unneeded turn lanes would be totally sufficient round a bouts will back traffic up I drive truck and have seen many round a bouts some good and some bad I can say with confidence that this is a bad idea and will cause major traffic problems
64 can't handle the traffic of a new development and traffic circles are not the answer
64W is congested as is. Please do not allow a high density neighborhood to add to the existing traffic issue as well as affect our home values.
Please reconsider this ridiculous development plan.
Having almost been killed at the entrance to Heathcote more than one time, I do not want more problems in this congested area.
Widening is needed. Roundabouts are not needed. Install traffic lights at the busiest intersections if traffic measurements demand them.
US64 is dangerous as is, need 3 lanes!
We do not need middle lanes for turning in front of Hunters Crossing or sugnals. This will make everything very difficult. If it's not broken dont fix. it. Arleen Slagle
They also must know we are NOT looking to have our beloved, historic road turned into a freeway into suburban sprawl. Keep 64W Country is our slogan.......all the way to Etowah and Brevard.
I am very concerned about the use of roundabouts in our community.
No roundabouts or solid contact continuous barrier. No driving out of business the seven affected businesses on 64 West @ Laurel Park. We need not need middle turn lanes and signals!