Fix 64 West

No round about in Laurel Park!

I am against the roundabout proposal and in favor of widening the proposed section to a three lane road.

If it is determined that this parcel can be developed, can there be any consideration to making it single family dwellings with decent size lots and green space. Look at the beauty of Hunters Crossing

A far too intensive proposal for the area. It is difficult to see how tractor-trailers will safely negotiate the proposed circles.

Thanks for all the hard work

Thanks for all of the hard work.

With what little room there is a roundabout idea is not a smart fix. The three ln. Is a lot smarter idea

8 years ago Featured

Rotaries or "round-a-bouts" have proven to cause many accidents. Coming from Hyannis, MA I can verify personally what happened. A divider was put down Barnstable Road leading from the rotary. This did not improve traffic flow, but caused a huge back-up especially in the summer and at Christmas time.

round-abouts have a proven history of creating more traffic issues instead of correcting them, when a barrier is put separating lanes.

Connie and I are opposed to the Arcadia View Cottage development and the proposed US 64 NCDOT traffic development plan.

Rte 64 is already overloaded. The road improvement issue must be addressed before adding more volume to it.

opposed. already have too much traffic.

Opposed

Both of these proposed plans are HORRIFIC!!! This will RUIN our subdivision and cause a traffic nightmare.... as if we don't already have one!!! No one seems to really CARE what would be in the best interests of the residents living along 64 WEST. We (Don & Patricia Sima) adamantly oppose the addition of another subdivision along 64 WEST and oppose the roundabout plan!!!

We are opposed to "Cottages of Arcadia Views" as well as any traffic circles on US64 West.

Traffic circles are an invitation to accidents. I've run through them in Maryland an countries in Europe.

No roundabouts please, widen road or install new traffic signals instead. Also opposing new Laurel Park development, due to increased traffic.

It's not surprising that the persons most affected by this decision were not consulted. Our elected officials forget that they work for US! Not the way they would have us believe.

Davis Mtn. Road, Daniel Dr., Crystal Spring Rd., Silver Pine Dr. and White Pine Dr. cannot handle a huge increase in traffic. Silver Pine Dr. does not allow two vehicles to pass at the same time. I am very much in opposition to routing the traffic from a high density development through Laurel Park. The real estate ads now read "desirable Laurel Park". Let's hope that will continue.

There is already too much traffic on 64W without more high density rentals adding to the problem