Protect the Exe: Stop Excessive Control & Charges from the Proposed HRO
195 Comments
A
Anonymous
8 months ago
Very disappointing to see that this is even being proposed. The river should be a free amenity for everyone to use. Why make it more difficult for people to enjoy the great natural amenities on our doorstep.
S
Samuel Heslop
8 months ago
This is outrageous, and very poorly publicised. The council should be ashamed.
M
Melissa Bradridge
8 months ago
I object to the HRO
C
Chris Owen
8 months ago
At a time when we need more rights of access (free) this is a perverse proposal!
R
Ross Bright
8 months ago
How can Exeter City Council think this is acceptable? absolute disgrace. Purely a cash raising exercise without consultation of local people.
J
Jim McNaughton
8 months ago
Charging paddle boarders and kayaks per day is not the way forward.
M
Mike Perks
8 months ago
These change deserves proper consultation. Which clearly hasn’t happened
F
Felicity Webster
8 months ago
What evidence do they have that this regulation will make any positive difference to this community?
D
Dominic Maxwell-Batten
8 months ago
unnecessary and over regulation. A purely fund raising exercise by a failing LA.
A
Andy Wood
8 months ago
I object to this
J
Jane Barham
8 months ago
We should be encouraging all and any outdoor activities for the sake of our health and mental wellbeing.
T
T Pearson
8 months ago
Water users should be entitled to use the waterways using the extant arrangements. There is not a problem on the Exe Estuary with regards to coexistence of the multiple different types of water user under the current arrangements. I am a wind
-surfer, sailor, power boat user and stand-up paddleboarder. Therefore, I am able to confirm that all these craft types co exist well under the current arrangments. Generating revenue in order to pay extra staff to enforce laws which are not necessary is against the spirit of UK Society
J
Jenni Gates
8 months ago
The Exe should be kept with free public access… otherwise water sports become only for the rich and local people will no longer be able to enjoy the river.
S
Stephen michell
8 months ago
I object to this proposal and am disappointed by the lack of transparency.
L
Lyn Greenaway
8 months ago
I believe this proposal is wrong. All businesses using the water are taxed and licensed anyway. They have public liability insurance. Why is all this necessary.
M
Martin Gill
8 months ago
As a paddle boarder I object to the council making what is a low energy and non environmental harm a possible criminal offence
L
Lyndsay Head
8 months ago
Rivers for everyone
P
Peter Morris
8 months ago
I believe the River Exe should remain a public amenity for all to use without charge
A
Anonymous
8 months ago
This will be totally unaffordable.
All people need access to leisure
P
Patricia Matheson
8 months ago
This proposal seems most unfair, expensive, and unnecessary. Exeter Council should be promoting the use of the River Exe for leisure purposes, not trying to make money out of it all!
Very disappointing to see that this is even being proposed. The river should be a free amenity for everyone to use. Why make it more difficult for people to enjoy the great natural amenities on our doorstep.
This is outrageous, and very poorly publicised. The council should be ashamed.
I object to the HRO
At a time when we need more rights of access (free) this is a perverse proposal!
How can Exeter City Council think this is acceptable? absolute disgrace. Purely a cash raising exercise without consultation of local people.
Charging paddle boarders and kayaks per day is not the way forward.
These change deserves proper consultation. Which clearly hasn’t happened
What evidence do they have that this regulation will make any positive difference to this community?
unnecessary and over regulation. A purely fund raising exercise by a failing LA.
I object to this
We should be encouraging all and any outdoor activities for the sake of our health and mental wellbeing.
Water users should be entitled to use the waterways using the extant arrangements. There is not a problem on the Exe Estuary with regards to coexistence of the multiple different types of water user under the current arrangements. I am a wind -surfer, sailor, power boat user and stand-up paddleboarder. Therefore, I am able to confirm that all these craft types co exist well under the current arrangments. Generating revenue in order to pay extra staff to enforce laws which are not necessary is against the spirit of UK Society
The Exe should be kept with free public access… otherwise water sports become only for the rich and local people will no longer be able to enjoy the river.
I object to this proposal and am disappointed by the lack of transparency.
I believe this proposal is wrong. All businesses using the water are taxed and licensed anyway. They have public liability insurance. Why is all this necessary.
As a paddle boarder I object to the council making what is a low energy and non environmental harm a possible criminal offence
Rivers for everyone
I believe the River Exe should remain a public amenity for all to use without charge
This will be totally unaffordable. All people need access to leisure
This proposal seems most unfair, expensive, and unnecessary. Exeter Council should be promoting the use of the River Exe for leisure purposes, not trying to make money out of it all!