Protect the Exe: Stop Excessive Control & Charges from the Proposed HRO
195 Comments
A
Anonymous
8 months ago
Exe estuary already beautifully monitored and respected by locals and visitors alike. Current imposed restrictions (eg. RSPB, speed limits, harbour patrol, seasonal landing in certain areas, fishing bylaws) already govern the overall environment and I would be interested to view the records regarding any such breaches of such restrictions that have been logged over the last 20 years. I don't feel that the estuary activity overall, warrants this potential money making scheme.
G
Gemma Keys
8 months ago
I don’t understand why water sports users are being punished when the entirety of Exeter uses the Estuary for cycling and walking. This is definitely a case of the minority being punished.
J
Jeremy Keys
8 months ago
Featured
As a young watersports enthusiast, I cannot afford to pay fees to go paddle boarding or dingy sailing.
Why are water ports users getting punished when everyone in Exeter uses the estuary for walking and cycling.
A
Alan Keys
8 months ago
Watersports users are already charged in the form of car parking fees by the council. Wind/Kitesurfers are migratory having been one for 30 years. They simply go where it’s easiest/best conditions. If you charge them more, they simply go somewhere else and you get no income for the council, town of Exmouth or surrounding businesses.
Why punish water sports users, when everyone from the city of Exeter use the estuary for walking, cycling and bird watching!
This is already paid for in our council taxes!!
V
Veronica Palmer
8 months ago
The River Exe needs to remain open to the public.
S
Stephen Hudd
8 months ago
I have sent an objection to the relevant body as well.
Hope this helps future developments
L
Lucy Payne
8 months ago
Objecting to proposals to charge users of the river Exe
N
Nick Warren
8 months ago
The estuary and sea fronts should be free for all domestic users to use.
A
Anonymous
8 months ago
this is ridiculous!!!!!!
N
Nic George
8 months ago
Just a bad idea for those who appreciate the sea and spend lots of time enjoying it.
R
Rosalinde Trippett
8 months ago
The proposal has been deliberately been hidden from the public so the closing date will pass and objections won’t be heard
R
Rebecca Abunassar
8 months ago
As an owner of a Mooring at starcross I strongly object to the city council trying to charge to use the river
F
Fion
8 months ago
I object to the proposals to have to pay to use the river
K
Keith Parsons
8 months ago
This is a case of clear overreach. We should be encouraging outdoor activity, not placing artificial barriers in the way of people's recreation.
A
Anonymous
8 months ago
Strongly opposed to this plan - a letter has been sent
J
Jason eveleigh
8 months ago
Do not do this.
I
iain sanderson
8 months ago
a waste of everyones time and money, it's not needed except by Ashmores the lawyers
A
Anonymous
8 months ago
There is no provision of safety or cleaning/upkeep provided by Exeter City Council on the estuary. They seem to see it a s a resource that can be monetised for their benefit.
M
Mark Gerry
8 months ago
Would they like us to pay to breath as well?
N
Nigel Cannock
8 months ago
We don't need this, as it's another restrictions on our use of our waters..
Exe estuary already beautifully monitored and respected by locals and visitors alike. Current imposed restrictions (eg. RSPB, speed limits, harbour patrol, seasonal landing in certain areas, fishing bylaws) already govern the overall environment and I would be interested to view the records regarding any such breaches of such restrictions that have been logged over the last 20 years. I don't feel that the estuary activity overall, warrants this potential money making scheme.
I don’t understand why water sports users are being punished when the entirety of Exeter uses the Estuary for cycling and walking. This is definitely a case of the minority being punished.
As a young watersports enthusiast, I cannot afford to pay fees to go paddle boarding or dingy sailing. Why are water ports users getting punished when everyone in Exeter uses the estuary for walking and cycling.
Watersports users are already charged in the form of car parking fees by the council. Wind/Kitesurfers are migratory having been one for 30 years. They simply go where it’s easiest/best conditions. If you charge them more, they simply go somewhere else and you get no income for the council, town of Exmouth or surrounding businesses. Why punish water sports users, when everyone from the city of Exeter use the estuary for walking, cycling and bird watching! This is already paid for in our council taxes!!
The River Exe needs to remain open to the public.
I have sent an objection to the relevant body as well. Hope this helps future developments
Objecting to proposals to charge users of the river Exe
The estuary and sea fronts should be free for all domestic users to use.
this is ridiculous!!!!!!
Just a bad idea for those who appreciate the sea and spend lots of time enjoying it.
The proposal has been deliberately been hidden from the public so the closing date will pass and objections won’t be heard
As an owner of a Mooring at starcross I strongly object to the city council trying to charge to use the river
I object to the proposals to have to pay to use the river
This is a case of clear overreach. We should be encouraging outdoor activity, not placing artificial barriers in the way of people's recreation.
Strongly opposed to this plan - a letter has been sent
Do not do this.
a waste of everyones time and money, it's not needed except by Ashmores the lawyers
There is no provision of safety or cleaning/upkeep provided by Exeter City Council on the estuary. They seem to see it a s a resource that can be monetised for their benefit.
Would they like us to pay to breath as well?
We don't need this, as it's another restrictions on our use of our waters..