Skip to main content

Eureka Neighbors Against High-Density Zoning at Hwy 109 / W / FF

139 Comments

L
Logan Detering
9 years ago

Terrible idea

N
Nina Pape
9 years ago

This is a horrible idea from the beginning. The not so "wise men "have changed the course of our river which will always flood our Eureka town because they filled in the land where the water was flooding. What are your plans for the town of Eureka? This land should never be built on, but instead returned to its natural state!

D
Dixie Eckert
9 years ago

Don't want Eureka to be a huge town!!! Small town is perfect.

R
Rick Kroeger
9 years ago

As a resident of adjoining property I am opposed to this high density project.

K
Kyle Brown
9 years ago

No more houses!!

D
David Lisinski
9 years ago

I'm in complete agreement with the content of this petition. The planned development flies in the face of the already planned development parameters and protocols.

J
J Smith
9 years ago

We do not have enough roads or businesses to support this level of high density housing. The community will not continue to be as highly sought as a place to move when there is an unreasonable commute just to get thru town.

D
Donna Westermayer
9 years ago

I am against this dense development.

N
Nancy Connelly
9 years ago

For over 41 years, our fair share of taxes have been paid to Rockwood School District, Eureka Fire Dept and that is a pretty lame comment to make. Obviously you are not worried about what this could do to a beautiful rural area that's contributed its fair share to the Eureka and SW St Louis county area.

B
Beth Nesbit
9 years ago

Too much already! Flood table, infrastructure, schools, emergency services, retail space all impacted. I wonder how this might be different if residents of Jefferson County had to rely only on Jeffco services including the school system.

T
Timothy McGuire
9 years ago

I am against this development

D
David Burns
9 years ago

I'm concerned about the water tables. Many of us are on wells and are concerned. So many new homes will devalue our existing properties.

N
Nichole Parker
9 years ago

This would greatly impact our terrible traffic situation, as well as over crowding in our schools.

C
Cheryl sheehy
9 years ago

Too many homes to be built. Not enough school room, schools already packed to capacity and then some. Not enough road for traffic, traffic is horrible right now as it is. It will personally screw my view up of the nice scenery I have right now. Love nature...

S
Steven adams
9 years ago

Traffic is already to bad at that intersection.

J
Joel Beck
9 years ago Featured

Way too many homes for the area. Against it for the reasons listed. Primarily the traffic, the overcrowding of the schools & the unknown impact on Mirasol Subdivision. This new subdivision does NOT have a pool, in their plans. That will have an impact on our pool. NOT good.

K
Kathleen McIntosh
9 years ago Featured

My concerns are twofold: the effect on traffic on the already congested 109/W/FF intersection, which in turn would negatively affect the ingress/egress of the Mirasol subdivision; and the impact on the already strained public schools and their capacity for additional students.

B
Blake Anyan
9 years ago

This is a shame. Area is congested enough as it is, and actually pretty to look at for now. This one needs to be stopped in its tracks.

J
Justin Cox
9 years ago

Very sad.

R
Ray Keefe
9 years ago

Enough development of valued green space. Way to much stress on schools and infrastructure.