Skip to main content

coltonsaysno

1,175 Comments

R
Rachel milner
10 years ago

Don't knows who's idea this is but it's very wrong

T
T.Dennis
10 years ago

Green belt should be preserved.We already have inadequate school places and overburdened roads in the area.

H
Helen Baia
10 years ago

Speaking as someone who went to the original Colton Primary when mostly the houses were just fields. All I can say is you've done enough. LEAVE COLTON ALONE

S
Sandra Stone
10 years ago

Colton has as much traffic as it csn cope with, being used as a rat run from the motorway and 165 houses, each with a potential of two cars, will put another 330 cars through the village. Green belt land is being swallowed at an alarming rate and Colton will become more like a new town!!! Please let Colton breathe! Or to be flippant, why not used fields of Templenewsam? That's Green Belt as well isn't it?

B
Bill Stead
10 years ago

You cannot keep eating away at the green belt. I lived here when there was only 60 houses. It has been expanded over the years but is still a nice place to live. The roads etc are overcrowded now never mind with an extra 3 cars per household. There must be plenty of brown field sites available.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Ridiculous notion Colton cannot cope with more traffic and more people. Ruining the open aspect and greenbelt is appalling. Assuming the houses will be family house and not a retirement village is the school going to be made larger next as already a waiting list I believe. As for the gypsy site.... Speechless why there why not near the tip at the bottom of bullerthorpe if we really need one and never seen a group of only 4 or less caravans before you know it will be 400 shocking.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

'The development plans are so ill conceived' Says it all

J
Jean Hack
10 years ago

It is wrong to be using green belt land., the consequences for the area are unthinkable. Schools are already oversubscribed, road congestion is bad even before any more homes are built. Think again, listen to the people.

T
Toni Jones
10 years ago

Travellers should travel....hence their name!They should not be given permanent residence anywhere,if they want this they can buy a house & pay council tax & a mortgage like the rest of us!

D
Daniel smith
10 years ago

it's one of the most stupid things I've heard of it will de value houses around surrounding area and put elderly and vulnerable residents at risk of been ripped of with there building schemes let alone crime going up with these people around

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Definitely no

J
JOSHUA CHEETHAM
10 years ago

Not enough school facilities in the area to hold anymore houses, and Colton is a lovely family area, therefore people do not want a traveler site.

S
Steven Davy
10 years ago

Totally against the travellers site.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

The local schools are already full so introducing more residents is insane! First the council should sort the schools,parks and local roads before adding to the problem!

G
Greg howarth
10 years ago

Keep our green belt and protect our community from housing development and travellers.

J
jane foster
10 years ago

Green belt land should never be built on to make way for yet another concrete jungle. This area is full of wildlife and is used by walkers and local schools for educational purposes. Traffic volume would be excessive not to mention the rise in air pollution.

D
Dale Bannister
10 years ago

Simply put, No! This would be a disaster for Colton and not only would destroy the lovely green belt land, but would put more strain on the surrounding roads. That can NOT cope already. Somebody needs their head testing!

J
James Mclean
10 years ago

No to the gypsies yes to more parks for children

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Plenty of more suitable places

S
Simon Goddard
10 years ago

whoever carried out a feasibility study on this and then continued to planning really needs to have a good hard talk to themselves