While I understand the need for more housing, building a travellers site in an area like Templenewsam is a travesty
M
Mary Hurt
10 years ago
I have lived in this area for 65 years and I think it is awful to take more of our green belt away. I think I cannot believe that the council have not consulted residents about this. But I do think this is typical of Leeds City Council.
M
Marites Gupit-Wills
10 years ago
No!!!
I
Ian Reynolds
10 years ago
No no no
G
Gillian Parkin
10 years ago
Crime will go up,site will be left a mess costing tax payers more money to clean up mess they leave,local medical centres are already at there limit,schools will be over crowded,traffic with be chaos ,it will lead to the gypsy site extending
M
Mr Simon
10 years ago
I am against these proposals being concerned about the increase in local traffic and local amenities not been sufficient
B
Bernard Kelly
10 years ago
A gypsy site will devalue properties that people have worked hard to afford
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This is a green belt area and should not be allocated for a gypsy site. It will spoil the beauty of our beloved park.
P
Pat Kelly
10 years ago
The introduction of a permanent gypsy site will devalue the surrounding private housing that people have worked hard to afford.
R
Richard Brogan
10 years ago
Say 'NO' to freeloading non tax payers who disregard normal working people doing the best for their families. Shame on you LCC for even considering the proposal. What an underhand, dishonest and disrespectful way to treat your council tax payers.
J
Julie Ridge
10 years ago
I cannot believe that there is to be yet more building in and around Colton and on beautiful green belt land too which is so rich in wildlife and natural habitat. This will add to the increasing problems of congestion experienced in the village which is already a rat run for commuters. Surely there are better sites less detrimental to both community and countryside.
D
Donna Bush
10 years ago
Disgusting & Outrageous!! Soon there will be nothing beautiful left in this country I was so proud to call home???
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Infrastructure inadequate for the
additional housing
W
Wendy Stevens
10 years ago
Too many houses in colton already. Area will be well over populated.
S
Susan Carr
10 years ago
Rediculas idea
L
Louise Taylor
10 years ago
Strongly object to a large traveller site being built in a heavily populated residential area. There must be many more sites to consider that aren't in residential areas.
P
PhillipTaylor
10 years ago
Strongly object to a traveller site being built in such a heavily populated residential area.
J
Jacquie Robinson
10 years ago
This is a ridiculous plan. This land is supposed to be of historial heritage .
Colton villiage over the last number of years has absorbed a lot of new housing and we have lost a lot green belt. The traffic through the villiage has increased enormously even with the recent 20 mph limit thishas done nothing to reduce the traffic or in some cases the speed of traffic. Any further new developements and/or travellers site will further depreciate the value of houses in the villiage especially Old Colton.
S
susan marshall
10 years ago
Yet again Leeds Labour council running roughshod over local residents.Let the council planning members put these developments in their back yards.All these developments are getting out of control.
While I understand the need for more housing, building a travellers site in an area like Templenewsam is a travesty
I have lived in this area for 65 years and I think it is awful to take more of our green belt away. I think I cannot believe that the council have not consulted residents about this. But I do think this is typical of Leeds City Council.
No!!!
No no no
Crime will go up,site will be left a mess costing tax payers more money to clean up mess they leave,local medical centres are already at there limit,schools will be over crowded,traffic with be chaos ,it will lead to the gypsy site extending
I am against these proposals being concerned about the increase in local traffic and local amenities not been sufficient
A gypsy site will devalue properties that people have worked hard to afford
This is a green belt area and should not be allocated for a gypsy site. It will spoil the beauty of our beloved park.
The introduction of a permanent gypsy site will devalue the surrounding private housing that people have worked hard to afford.
Say 'NO' to freeloading non tax payers who disregard normal working people doing the best for their families. Shame on you LCC for even considering the proposal. What an underhand, dishonest and disrespectful way to treat your council tax payers.
I cannot believe that there is to be yet more building in and around Colton and on beautiful green belt land too which is so rich in wildlife and natural habitat. This will add to the increasing problems of congestion experienced in the village which is already a rat run for commuters. Surely there are better sites less detrimental to both community and countryside.
Disgusting & Outrageous!! Soon there will be nothing beautiful left in this country I was so proud to call home???
Infrastructure inadequate for the additional housing
Too many houses in colton already. Area will be well over populated.
Rediculas idea
Strongly object to a large traveller site being built in a heavily populated residential area. There must be many more sites to consider that aren't in residential areas.
Strongly object to a traveller site being built in such a heavily populated residential area.
This is a ridiculous plan. This land is supposed to be of historial heritage . Colton villiage over the last number of years has absorbed a lot of new housing and we have lost a lot green belt. The traffic through the villiage has increased enormously even with the recent 20 mph limit thishas done nothing to reduce the traffic or in some cases the speed of traffic. Any further new developements and/or travellers site will further depreciate the value of houses in the villiage especially Old Colton.
Yet again Leeds Labour council running roughshod over local residents.Let the council planning members put these developments in their back yards.All these developments are getting out of control.
I am against this