I support the four policy issues.
Joseph Kuhn, http://scienceblogs.de/gesundheits-check/
S
Stefano mugnaini
7 years ago
Solidale
A
alirio
7 years ago
Apoyo a restablecer la confianza..
muy cordialmente..
W
William Ward
7 years ago
The need to have an institution that people can assess for themselves as transparent is paramount
A
Asger Sand Paludan-Müller
7 years ago
Cochrane supporter
F
Frederik Martiny
7 years ago
Not a Cochrane member but I admire the work by Cochrane, the rigorous scientific quality of their reviews and their inspiring critique of poor quality research and corporate interests. However, I am like many others saddened by the recent events in Cochrane. I hope that Cochrane can come back to the principles of transparency and protecting the freedom of expression.
J
Jacob Puliyel
7 years ago
We don't need a industry funded lap-dog called Cochrane
O
Oscar Grosjean
7 years ago
… and too much medicine just to make money !!
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Cost-effectiveness of health care and the right use of its´resources should be on the focus.
L
Laura Amato
7 years ago
Laura Amato Coordinating editor Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group
R
ravaud
7 years ago
Cochrane has to change and reaffirm its common values essential to the functioning and credibility of our collaboration
M
Massimo brunetti
7 years ago
Health Economist
Anticorruption and Internal Audit
Local Health Unit Modena Italy
Part in the past of the the Economic Cochrane Group
R
Roberta Villa
7 years ago
As a health journalist, I deemed Cochrane a unique source of reliable, indipendent information and I hope to be able to restore my trust in it
N
Nazran Mustapha
7 years ago
support the better change. About time
R
Rihab
7 years ago
support the four courses
N
Nazran
7 years ago
support the four courses for change
R
Rokuro Hama
7 years ago
I sign this petition.
Rokuro Hama
Chairperson "Med Check"
NPOJIP: Non-Profit Organization "Japan Institute of Pharmacovigilance"
publishing ISDB-full-membership Drug Bulletin
Followings are from the editorial of our latest issue of our bulletin "Med Check TIP"
***************************
Now it is clear that only the information which is totally independent of pharmaceutical companies is reliable. What is important is not simply the transparency of conflict of interest, but the fact that conflicts of interest distort scientific information. If conflict of interest is not eliminated, Cochrane will no longer be trusted by patients and medical professionals.
The current governing board does not represent the opinions of Cochrane because half of members who are critical to the decision by the current governing board.
Hence, we support the views of Dr. Peter Gøtzsche and the ISDB Committee that the current board should be dissolved and reelected. In addition, we believe that the Articles of Cochrane (note) should be amended as well.
**********************************
From the Editorial of 80th issue of “Med Check TIP” (in Japanese) published in November 2018 and “Med Check TIP” in English which will be published December 2018
https://npojip.org/english/MedCheck/medchecktip.html
note: according to the Articles of Cochrane, the number of the board members should not be less than three.
James
I support the four policy issues. Joseph Kuhn, http://scienceblogs.de/gesundheits-check/
Solidale
Apoyo a restablecer la confianza.. muy cordialmente..
The need to have an institution that people can assess for themselves as transparent is paramount
Cochrane supporter
Not a Cochrane member but I admire the work by Cochrane, the rigorous scientific quality of their reviews and their inspiring critique of poor quality research and corporate interests. However, I am like many others saddened by the recent events in Cochrane. I hope that Cochrane can come back to the principles of transparency and protecting the freedom of expression.
We don't need a industry funded lap-dog called Cochrane
… and too much medicine just to make money !!
Cost-effectiveness of health care and the right use of its´resources should be on the focus.
Laura Amato Coordinating editor Cochrane Drugs and Alcohol Group
Cochrane has to change and reaffirm its common values essential to the functioning and credibility of our collaboration
Health Economist Anticorruption and Internal Audit Local Health Unit Modena Italy Part in the past of the the Economic Cochrane Group
As a health journalist, I deemed Cochrane a unique source of reliable, indipendent information and I hope to be able to restore my trust in it
support the better change. About time
support the four courses
support the four courses for change
I sign this petition. Rokuro Hama Chairperson "Med Check" NPOJIP: Non-Profit Organization "Japan Institute of Pharmacovigilance" publishing ISDB-full-membership Drug Bulletin Followings are from the editorial of our latest issue of our bulletin "Med Check TIP" *************************** Now it is clear that only the information which is totally independent of pharmaceutical companies is reliable. What is important is not simply the transparency of conflict of interest, but the fact that conflicts of interest distort scientific information. If conflict of interest is not eliminated, Cochrane will no longer be trusted by patients and medical professionals. The current governing board does not represent the opinions of Cochrane because half of members who are critical to the decision by the current governing board. Hence, we support the views of Dr. Peter Gøtzsche and the ISDB Committee that the current board should be dissolved and reelected. In addition, we believe that the Articles of Cochrane (note) should be amended as well. ********************************** From the Editorial of 80th issue of “Med Check TIP” (in Japanese) published in November 2018 and “Med Check TIP” in English which will be published December 2018 https://npojip.org/english/MedCheck/medchecktip.html note: according to the Articles of Cochrane, the number of the board members should not be less than three.
Support everything for better change
Support everything for Cochrane