I am a Cochrane member and strongly support the proposition.
G
Guenter Ollenschlaeger
7 years ago
Founding Chair 2002-2005, Guidelines International Network.
E
Eila Kankaanpää
7 years ago
member, and full support
U
Udo Kaiser
7 years ago
Ich unterstütze die Petition.
V
Valérie Labonté
7 years ago
Cochrane member
A
Antje Timmer
7 years ago
Cochrane Author and Member of Editorial Board (Cochrane IBD)
F
Frank van Dijk
7 years ago
Expert in international knowledge infrastructure esp. in occupational and public health; advocate of Open Access of all medical scientific publications.
K
Karen Nieuwenhuijsen
7 years ago
As a Cochrane review author I fully support this call for transparency.
C
Christine Rudolf
7 years ago
I am not a Cochrane Member. I am Member of Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin and I fully support this initiative.
D
Dika Luijendijk
7 years ago
Thank you for this initiative. As a Cochrane author, current events have worried me too. I would like to add an additional concern: create Cochrane reviews free of conflicts of interest.
E
Edwin Toepler
7 years ago
without confidence scientific work is not possible
A
Alessandro Rivetti
7 years ago
Fully Agree !
C
Carel Hulshof
7 years ago
I fully support this petition. Transparency is one of the major assets of evidence based medicine.
J
Jarmo Heikkinen
7 years ago
I fully support the proposals. Transparency, focused actions, unity and good economy create an entrustable basis for a scientific organisation.
J
Juha Liira
7 years ago
I hope an open and critical community in Cochrane
S
silvia brandalise
7 years ago
I completely agree with zero tolerance for bad behaviour in Public Health Politics .
P
Petter Brattström
7 years ago
I fully support this initiative. Even the slightest deviation from a transparent governance makes "trusted evidence" into pretty empty words.
P
Peter von Philipsborn
7 years ago
I’m a Cochrane review author and member of Cochrane Public Health. What concerns me most about the recent developments is the lack of transparency, and the unwillingness (or inability) of the remaining members of the Cochrane Governing Board to explain the reasons for their decision to expel Peter Gotzsche (“bad behaviour” and “damage to Cochrane” does not count as meaningful explanation). This opaqueness around such an imporant, and controversial decision is totally inacceptable, not matter how justified the decision might have been.
M
Mª Teresa Acín Gericó
7 years ago
Featured
I am a member of Cochrane hypertension group. I agree on the four points of development. Different opinions are necessary, always shown with respect. It should be clear what zero tolerance means
MD postdoc Copenhagen University
I am a Cochrane member and strongly support the proposition.
Founding Chair 2002-2005, Guidelines International Network.
member, and full support
Ich unterstütze die Petition.
Cochrane member
Cochrane Author and Member of Editorial Board (Cochrane IBD)
Expert in international knowledge infrastructure esp. in occupational and public health; advocate of Open Access of all medical scientific publications.
As a Cochrane review author I fully support this call for transparency.
I am not a Cochrane Member. I am Member of Netzwerk Evidenzbasierte Medizin and I fully support this initiative.
Thank you for this initiative. As a Cochrane author, current events have worried me too. I would like to add an additional concern: create Cochrane reviews free of conflicts of interest.
without confidence scientific work is not possible
Fully Agree !
I fully support this petition. Transparency is one of the major assets of evidence based medicine.
I fully support the proposals. Transparency, focused actions, unity and good economy create an entrustable basis for a scientific organisation.
I hope an open and critical community in Cochrane
I completely agree with zero tolerance for bad behaviour in Public Health Politics .
I fully support this initiative. Even the slightest deviation from a transparent governance makes "trusted evidence" into pretty empty words.
I’m a Cochrane review author and member of Cochrane Public Health. What concerns me most about the recent developments is the lack of transparency, and the unwillingness (or inability) of the remaining members of the Cochrane Governing Board to explain the reasons for their decision to expel Peter Gotzsche (“bad behaviour” and “damage to Cochrane” does not count as meaningful explanation). This opaqueness around such an imporant, and controversial decision is totally inacceptable, not matter how justified the decision might have been.
I am a member of Cochrane hypertension group. I agree on the four points of development. Different opinions are necessary, always shown with respect. It should be clear what zero tolerance means