Change the Million Dollar Show to a different category
274 Comments
M
Molly cherry
7 years ago
I love the idea of the event!! But agree with this fully, it needs a fair qualifying system for all.
K
Karen Shedlauskas
7 years ago
One of the founding principles of NRHA was to provide record keeping. With the inclusion of the "exhibition" monies, we are allowing the polluting of over 50 years of record keeping. Create a earnings category that does not allow the earnings from this event to count toward LTE. Disappointed in those that voted despite their obvious conflict of interest.
W
Willard B Wood
7 years ago
10007
L
Lori Seyfried
7 years ago
Egregious behavior on the part of an elite few. I think the opportunity to highlight reining to the world is spot on! However, to let the earnings count towards lifetime earnings is short sighted and a conflict of interest. The board needs to take a step back, admit error and change the decision.
T
Travis Chapman
7 years ago
Fully support the event but don’t believe the earnings should count towards LTE. The conflict of interest in voting needs to be addressed.
#36570
M
Misty
7 years ago
Done
M
Mike Garnett
7 years ago
2376
C
Camela Essick
7 years ago
NRHA Lifetime Member #12771
Breeder, rider and owner.
Against invitational events where the NRHA includes any of earnings in nrha records for the horses, owners, riders, breeders.
C
Colleen Siadik
7 years ago
10953 member number
D
Dallas Wedel
7 years ago
50518
N
nathalie mcentire
7 years ago
AGREED THE EARNINGS SHOULD NOT COUNT FOR LTE EARNINGS ! . KEY WORD "INVITATIONAL!"
D
Diane Yoder
7 years ago
Former NRHA Board Member and NRHA Life Member
J
Jennifer Robinson
7 years ago
I agree with these statements 100%
L
Lauren Sanborn
7 years ago
Make it fair to all riders.
R
Rick Walker
7 years ago
Make it fair to all.
S
Stephan Elenius
7 years ago
Stephan Elenius
54433
A
Annie Annunziata
7 years ago
NRHA #448
W
Wendy Williams
7 years ago
I ask to have a qualifier for the ancillary classes be held in Canada as it is such a long drive and great expense for Canadians to attend the qualifiers. The management declined. I applaud the opportunity to have a show with the purse this large in North America, but I believe it is needs to be accessible to all if the earnings of horse and rider are to be recorded within our Membership. NRHA #44912
M
Michelle Liggett
7 years ago
6635
M
MaryAnne Hall
7 years ago
I think earnings should be acknowledged in another category all together and shouldn’t count for LTE on horse or rider. Also I think the selection process does not seem fair and should be reevaluated---Mary Anne Hall
I love the idea of the event!! But agree with this fully, it needs a fair qualifying system for all.
One of the founding principles of NRHA was to provide record keeping. With the inclusion of the "exhibition" monies, we are allowing the polluting of over 50 years of record keeping. Create a earnings category that does not allow the earnings from this event to count toward LTE. Disappointed in those that voted despite their obvious conflict of interest.
10007
Egregious behavior on the part of an elite few. I think the opportunity to highlight reining to the world is spot on! However, to let the earnings count towards lifetime earnings is short sighted and a conflict of interest. The board needs to take a step back, admit error and change the decision.
Fully support the event but don’t believe the earnings should count towards LTE. The conflict of interest in voting needs to be addressed. #36570
Done
2376
NRHA Lifetime Member #12771 Breeder, rider and owner. Against invitational events where the NRHA includes any of earnings in nrha records for the horses, owners, riders, breeders.
10953 member number
50518
AGREED THE EARNINGS SHOULD NOT COUNT FOR LTE EARNINGS ! . KEY WORD "INVITATIONAL!"
Former NRHA Board Member and NRHA Life Member
I agree with these statements 100%
Make it fair to all riders.
Make it fair to all.
Stephan Elenius 54433
NRHA #448
I ask to have a qualifier for the ancillary classes be held in Canada as it is such a long drive and great expense for Canadians to attend the qualifiers. The management declined. I applaud the opportunity to have a show with the purse this large in North America, but I believe it is needs to be accessible to all if the earnings of horse and rider are to be recorded within our Membership. NRHA #44912
6635
I think earnings should be acknowledged in another category all together and shouldn’t count for LTE on horse or rider. Also I think the selection process does not seem fair and should be reevaluated---Mary Anne Hall