Skip to main content

A plea for caution before changing bacterial names in databases

121 Comments

A
Aimee Ward Verified
1 day ago

Since taxonomy is a human concept make to make the identification of organisms easier, its agreeable to actually make it easier.

T
Tatiana Stratulat Verified
9 days ago

As a biotechnologist working with bacterial strains, stable nomenclature is essential for reliable strain identification, data traceability, and reproducibility of research.

I
Ihsanawati Ihsanawati Verified
19 days ago

I agree with this plea, not to create other problem

F
Franca Rossi Verified
25 days ago

Bacterial names are not only for taxonomista but also for medical and veterinary professionals who must rely on consistency in taxon identification in clinical samples in different historical periods

M
Muhammad Asif Verified
26 days ago

Changing name should be avoided

J
Jan Gawor Verified
1 month ago

I support this initiative. As a biotechnologist and microbiologist I must say that consistent nomenclature is essential in my field.

L
Lance van der Merwe Verified
1 month ago

I am a Microbiology student and frequently use these databases, and any unnecessary change would be detrimental not just to my projects and workflow, but also have a massive impact on the workings of major clinical corporations

D
Daniel W Verified
1 month ago

Many users of scientific names of bacteria, not least in the fields of human and veterinary medicine, complain about frequent changes to these names. The problem seems to occur more often in public databases than in the literature. The petition attempts to persuade these databases to take a more cautious approach.

R
Roland Sohmen Verified
1 month ago

Communication between scientist of different fields will be serious hampered if frequent changes of bacterial names happens, especially in the field of medicine and occupatioanal health, e.g. Chlamydia to Chlamydophilia to Chlamydia. Candia auris to Candidozymas auris

H
Harriet Wilson Verified
1 month ago

Rapid and accurate communication is essential for medical practitioners, while keeping pace with changes in prokaryotic taxonomy is not.

D
Dana Nováková Verified
1 month ago

Taxon names change too frequently, and this adds no value.

J
John Turnidge Verified
1 month ago

I have responsibility for certain documents created by EUCAST. Name changes are a constant headache

S
Sandro Furini Verified
1 month ago

Consultazione affidabile.

L
Lesley Hoyles Verified
1 month ago

Different taxonomic frameworks across LPSN, NCBI/EMBL/DDBJ and GTDB are causing big problems across (meta)genomic and cultivation studies. In a number of instances we've given up trying to describe novel species and validly publish names - especially for rare taxa - because life is too short and hands are too few to wade through the mess.

O
Olga Shapovalova Verified
1 month ago

Since I work as a medical microbiology teacher

A
Anja Breuker Verified
2 months ago

There has been an inflation of changing prokaryotic names.

T
Thøger Jensen Verified
2 months ago

The latest taxonomical synonym is often not more correct than a previous valid published name.

H
Hidetoshi Urakawa Verified
2 months ago

Taxonomy should facilitate scientific communication, not create confusion. The replacement of many long-established bacterial names has made microbiology increasingly difficult to follow, especially because textbooks have not yet adopted these revisions. Restoring widely recognized names, or retaining them as valid synonyms, would improve continuity and should be considered before updating bacterial names in public databases.

F
Fabian Bastiaanssen Verified
2 months ago

Without these kinds of policies databases become useless to search by name alone

C
Clament Chin Verified
2 months ago

For the future of bacteriology and microbiology.