A plea for caution before changing bacterial names in databases
112 Comments
H
Harriet Wilson
1 day ago
Rapid and accurate communication is essential for medical practitioners, while keeping pace with changes in prokaryotic taxonomy is not.
D
Dana Nováková
5 days ago
Taxon names change too frequently, and this adds no value.
J
John Turnidge
5 days ago
I have responsibility for certain documents created by EUCAST. Name changes are a constant headache
S
Sandro Furini
7 days ago
Consultazione affidabile.
L
Lesley Hoyles
12 days ago
Different taxonomic frameworks across LPSN, NCBI/EMBL/DDBJ and GTDB are causing big problems across (meta)genomic and cultivation studies. In a number of instances we've given up trying to describe novel species and validly publish names - especially for rare taxa - because life is too short and hands are too few to wade through the mess.
O
Olga Shapovalova
12 days ago
Since I work as a medical microbiology teacher
A
Anja Breuker
15 days ago
There has been an inflation of changing prokaryotic names.
T
Thøger Jensen
15 days ago
The latest taxonomical synonym is often not more correct than a previous valid published name.
H
Hidetoshi Urakawa
17 days ago
Taxonomy should facilitate scientific communication, not create confusion. The replacement of many long-established bacterial names has made microbiology increasingly difficult to follow, especially because textbooks have not yet adopted these revisions. Restoring widely recognized names, or retaining them as valid synonyms, would improve continuity and should be considered before updating bacterial names in public databases.
F
Fabian Bastiaanssen
19 days ago
Without these kinds of policies databases become useless to search by name alone
C
Clament Chin
19 days ago
For the future of bacteriology and microbiology.
J
Jeffrey Jones
19 days ago
Precise accepted nomenclature is critical for precisely referring to the causal agent by th correct name.
C
Costantino Vetriani
19 days ago
Exactly for the reasons articulated in the petition
N
Nick Jakubovics
19 days ago
Changing bacterial names causes significant problems and confusion until the new names become widely adopted. In several cases, names have subsequently changed again, causing further confusion. It would be better to take a more cautious approach to renaming bacterial taxa, as proposed in this petition.
C
Chip Kam Weng
20 days ago
Nomenclature and taxonomy are of utmost importance in scientific communication
T
Tsutomu Sekizaki
20 days ago
I always check the update taxonomy of bacteria. This greatly helps me to prepare the lecture of veterinary bacteriology in the University.
L
Luciano Augusto Palomino Kobayashi
20 days ago
Bacterial species determination is important since I work in bacterial genomics
H
HARI POLENAKOVIK
21 days ago
tp make it less confusing and more clinically relevant
M
miriam cordovana
26 days ago
Continuous taxonomy changes are creating serious issues in the clinical microbiology routine practice
R
Rachel Derscheid
29 days ago
The over-splitting and rapid adoption of proposed new names is confusing and often not fully "validated"; as an example, errors in Gupta et al's work have been identified.
Rapid and accurate communication is essential for medical practitioners, while keeping pace with changes in prokaryotic taxonomy is not.
Taxon names change too frequently, and this adds no value.
I have responsibility for certain documents created by EUCAST. Name changes are a constant headache
Consultazione affidabile.
Different taxonomic frameworks across LPSN, NCBI/EMBL/DDBJ and GTDB are causing big problems across (meta)genomic and cultivation studies. In a number of instances we've given up trying to describe novel species and validly publish names - especially for rare taxa - because life is too short and hands are too few to wade through the mess.
Since I work as a medical microbiology teacher
There has been an inflation of changing prokaryotic names.
The latest taxonomical synonym is often not more correct than a previous valid published name.
Taxonomy should facilitate scientific communication, not create confusion. The replacement of many long-established bacterial names has made microbiology increasingly difficult to follow, especially because textbooks have not yet adopted these revisions. Restoring widely recognized names, or retaining them as valid synonyms, would improve continuity and should be considered before updating bacterial names in public databases.
Without these kinds of policies databases become useless to search by name alone
For the future of bacteriology and microbiology.
Precise accepted nomenclature is critical for precisely referring to the causal agent by th correct name.
Exactly for the reasons articulated in the petition
Changing bacterial names causes significant problems and confusion until the new names become widely adopted. In several cases, names have subsequently changed again, causing further confusion. It would be better to take a more cautious approach to renaming bacterial taxa, as proposed in this petition.
Nomenclature and taxonomy are of utmost importance in scientific communication
I always check the update taxonomy of bacteria. This greatly helps me to prepare the lecture of veterinary bacteriology in the University.
Bacterial species determination is important since I work in bacterial genomics
tp make it less confusing and more clinically relevant
Continuous taxonomy changes are creating serious issues in the clinical microbiology routine practice
The over-splitting and rapid adoption of proposed new names is confusing and often not fully "validated"; as an example, errors in Gupta et al's work have been identified.