Skip to main content

A plea for caution before changing bacterial names in databases

112 Comments

H
Harriet Wilson Verified
1 day ago

Rapid and accurate communication is essential for medical practitioners, while keeping pace with changes in prokaryotic taxonomy is not.

D
Dana Nováková Verified
5 days ago

Taxon names change too frequently, and this adds no value.

J
John Turnidge Verified
5 days ago

I have responsibility for certain documents created by EUCAST. Name changes are a constant headache

S
Sandro Furini Verified
7 days ago

Consultazione affidabile.

L
Lesley Hoyles Verified
12 days ago

Different taxonomic frameworks across LPSN, NCBI/EMBL/DDBJ and GTDB are causing big problems across (meta)genomic and cultivation studies. In a number of instances we've given up trying to describe novel species and validly publish names - especially for rare taxa - because life is too short and hands are too few to wade through the mess.

O
Olga Shapovalova Verified
12 days ago

Since I work as a medical microbiology teacher

A
Anja Breuker Verified
15 days ago

There has been an inflation of changing prokaryotic names.

T
Thøger Jensen Verified
15 days ago

The latest taxonomical synonym is often not more correct than a previous valid published name.

H
Hidetoshi Urakawa Verified
17 days ago

Taxonomy should facilitate scientific communication, not create confusion. The replacement of many long-established bacterial names has made microbiology increasingly difficult to follow, especially because textbooks have not yet adopted these revisions. Restoring widely recognized names, or retaining them as valid synonyms, would improve continuity and should be considered before updating bacterial names in public databases.

F
Fabian Bastiaanssen Verified
19 days ago

Without these kinds of policies databases become useless to search by name alone

C
Clament Chin Verified
19 days ago

For the future of bacteriology and microbiology.

J
Jeffrey Jones Verified
19 days ago

Precise accepted nomenclature is critical for precisely referring to the causal agent by th correct name.

C
Costantino Vetriani Verified
19 days ago

Exactly for the reasons articulated in the petition

N
Nick Jakubovics Verified
19 days ago

Changing bacterial names causes significant problems and confusion until the new names become widely adopted. In several cases, names have subsequently changed again, causing further confusion. It would be better to take a more cautious approach to renaming bacterial taxa, as proposed in this petition.

C
Chip Kam Weng Verified
20 days ago

Nomenclature and taxonomy are of utmost importance in scientific communication

T
Tsutomu Sekizaki Verified
20 days ago

I always check the update taxonomy of bacteria. This greatly helps me to prepare the lecture of veterinary bacteriology in the University.

L
Luciano Augusto Palomino Kobayashi Verified
20 days ago

Bacterial species determination is important since I work in bacterial genomics

H
HARI POLENAKOVIK Verified
21 days ago

tp make it less confusing and more clinically relevant

M
miriam cordovana Verified
26 days ago

Continuous taxonomy changes are creating serious issues in the clinical microbiology routine practice

R
Rachel Derscheid Verified
29 days ago

The over-splitting and rapid adoption of proposed new names is confusing and often not fully "validated"; as an example, errors in Gupta et al's work have been identified.