A plea for caution before changing bacterial names in databases
128 Comments
L
Lesley Hoyles
3 months ago
Different taxonomic frameworks across LPSN, NCBI/EMBL/DDBJ and GTDB are causing big problems across (meta)genomic and cultivation studies. In a number of instances we've given up trying to describe novel species and validly publish names - especially for rare taxa - because life is too short and hands are too few to wade through the mess.
O
Olga Shapovalova
3 months ago
Since I work as a medical microbiology teacher
A
Anja Breuker
3 months ago
There has been an inflation of changing prokaryotic names.
T
Thøger Jensen
3 months ago
The latest taxonomical synonym is often not more correct than a previous valid published name.
H
Hidetoshi Urakawa
3 months ago
Taxonomy should facilitate scientific communication, not create confusion. The replacement of many long-established bacterial names has made microbiology increasingly difficult to follow, especially because textbooks have not yet adopted these revisions. Restoring widely recognized names, or retaining them as valid synonyms, would improve continuity and should be considered before updating bacterial names in public databases.
F
Fabian Bastiaanssen
3 months ago
Without these kinds of policies databases become useless to search by name alone
C
Clament Chin
3 months ago
For the future of bacteriology and microbiology.
J
Jeffrey Jones
3 months ago
Precise accepted nomenclature is critical for precisely referring to the causal agent by th correct name.
C
Costantino Vetriani
3 months ago
Exactly for the reasons articulated in the petition
N
Nick Jakubovics
3 months ago
Changing bacterial names causes significant problems and confusion until the new names become widely adopted. In several cases, names have subsequently changed again, causing further confusion. It would be better to take a more cautious approach to renaming bacterial taxa, as proposed in this petition.
C
Chip Kam Weng
3 months ago
Nomenclature and taxonomy are of utmost importance in scientific communication
T
Tsutomu Sekizaki
3 months ago
I always check the update taxonomy of bacteria. This greatly helps me to prepare the lecture of veterinary bacteriology in the University.
L
Luciano Augusto Palomino Kobayashi
3 months ago
Bacterial species determination is important since I work in bacterial genomics
H
HARI POLENAKOVIK
3 months ago
tp make it less confusing and more clinically relevant
M
miriam cordovana
3 months ago
Continuous taxonomy changes are creating serious issues in the clinical microbiology routine practice
R
Rachel Derscheid
4 months ago
The over-splitting and rapid adoption of proposed new names is confusing and often not fully "validated"; as an example, errors in Gupta et al's work have been identified.
K
Kalyani Maitra
4 months ago
To maintain uniformity in the bacterial taxon identification.
N
Neža Čadež
4 months ago
As a yeast taxonomist, I struggle with genus name changes that are made without consensus within the yeast research community. Therefore, I fully support the conservation of genus names and a consensus-based approach to any future bacterial genus name changes.
J
José Santos
4 months ago
As an Actinomycetota expert, I urge caution before modifying taxonomic names. These bacteria depend on stable nomenclature for vital scientific work, which can be disrupted. Moreover, name modification can obscure literature searches and fracture genomic datasets.
K
Katalin Kiss
4 months ago
we cannot change labels and product sheets once a product is made and distributed. These name changes create a risk for end users!
Different taxonomic frameworks across LPSN, NCBI/EMBL/DDBJ and GTDB are causing big problems across (meta)genomic and cultivation studies. In a number of instances we've given up trying to describe novel species and validly publish names - especially for rare taxa - because life is too short and hands are too few to wade through the mess.
Since I work as a medical microbiology teacher
There has been an inflation of changing prokaryotic names.
The latest taxonomical synonym is often not more correct than a previous valid published name.
Taxonomy should facilitate scientific communication, not create confusion. The replacement of many long-established bacterial names has made microbiology increasingly difficult to follow, especially because textbooks have not yet adopted these revisions. Restoring widely recognized names, or retaining them as valid synonyms, would improve continuity and should be considered before updating bacterial names in public databases.
Without these kinds of policies databases become useless to search by name alone
For the future of bacteriology and microbiology.
Precise accepted nomenclature is critical for precisely referring to the causal agent by th correct name.
Exactly for the reasons articulated in the petition
Changing bacterial names causes significant problems and confusion until the new names become widely adopted. In several cases, names have subsequently changed again, causing further confusion. It would be better to take a more cautious approach to renaming bacterial taxa, as proposed in this petition.
Nomenclature and taxonomy are of utmost importance in scientific communication
I always check the update taxonomy of bacteria. This greatly helps me to prepare the lecture of veterinary bacteriology in the University.
Bacterial species determination is important since I work in bacterial genomics
tp make it less confusing and more clinically relevant
Continuous taxonomy changes are creating serious issues in the clinical microbiology routine practice
The over-splitting and rapid adoption of proposed new names is confusing and often not fully "validated"; as an example, errors in Gupta et al's work have been identified.
To maintain uniformity in the bacterial taxon identification.
As a yeast taxonomist, I struggle with genus name changes that are made without consensus within the yeast research community. Therefore, I fully support the conservation of genus names and a consensus-based approach to any future bacterial genus name changes.
As an Actinomycetota expert, I urge caution before modifying taxonomic names. These bacteria depend on stable nomenclature for vital scientific work, which can be disrupted. Moreover, name modification can obscure literature searches and fracture genomic datasets.
we cannot change labels and product sheets once a product is made and distributed. These name changes create a risk for end users!