OPPOSE 296 apartments at Ridgeway Ave and Westport Rd.
240 Comments
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
The Waterson and Westport road traffic can’t handle additional vehicles. The neighborhoods and infrastructure isn’t developed for this many additional residents.
J
Janet Whittaker
3 years ago
Too much traffic in this area as it is.
J
Joanie Brenzel
3 years ago
Opposes the project
B
Bartholomew Judith
3 years ago
I am opposed to the density of the proposed construction project at Ridgeway Av and Westport Road. The area is appropriate for single family residences only.
C
Carole Baker
3 years ago
I definitely oppose these apartments. Traffic will be a nightmare. The size is hideous!!! This will ultimately reduce housing prices in St Matthews. I also see crime rate rising. An absolute nightmare. Our police department would need to increase staff and hardly see then now.
Absolutely NO!!!
V
Victor Osowski
3 years ago
Too tall does not fit the neighborhood and too much added traffic to an already congested area.
M
Mary Wehrley
3 years ago
This area is losing green space at a rapid rate. Roads have been widened and traffic is still dangerously heavy. This many apartments in a small space will only make it worse.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
I oppose the plan which will add more traffic to West Port Road and I am oppose the loss of green space in our city.
S
suzanne hoffacker
3 years ago
Traffic concerns:
VA Hospital already underway- traffic already increased as infrastructure is not in place, this is causing massive delays
Additional population adds these traffic concerns:
264 east, Exit 22 - Lanes for Rt 22, & Northeast/ & Southwest Rt 42 - these lanes will cause disruptions in traffic flow due to oncoming ramp from Westport Road/ exit 21.
264 East to ramp 71 North
Westport Road, SR 1447 at exit 21 on 264
Westport Road, SR 1447 Northeast & Southwest
C
Carol Kraemer
3 years ago
I oppose this plan.
L
Lorraine Rapp
3 years ago
I do not want the Gilman Point project in my backyard!
S
Sally porter
3 years ago
NO to this rezoning project , we can’t keep squeezing in these large projects on every square foot of green space. NO! Who wants more traffic, pollution and apartments in such a small space?
M
Mayrene mcpherson
3 years ago
I oppose Gilmans project on Westport rd
S
Sallie Buschemeyer
3 years ago
PLEASE STOP NOW!!! This is WHY, we want to move from St. Matthews area ASAP if 296 apartments are built. HAVE YOU SEE MIDDLETOWN behind Walmart? GO LOOK!
B
Beth Warren
3 years ago
Traffic is terrible in this area, especially certain times of the day-especially when Trinity starts and gets out. Adding all the extra cars would be a nightmare!
K
Kimberly Tidwell
3 years ago
I oppose the apartments
V
Virginia Lynn Delaney
3 years ago
Don’t allow zoning change at “ Gilman’s Point
B
Bonnie Reuling
3 years ago
I am very opposed to the development of additional apartments at Gilman Point. Way too much traffic now. We don’t need mode!
B
Beth Safley
3 years ago
They had to widen Westport Rd already because of heavy traffic. We do not need another traffic problem. The circular drive will not solve the problem. This plan will bring our property values down. A high rise does not go with the areas aesthetics.
L
LORI M WILLEMAIN
3 years ago
There are far more reasons not to construct a 3 story bldg to house 300 residences that own 1-2 vehicles on a 2-lane Rd that dead-ends into a small commercial lot & a RR unless of course you are the developer, a conglomerate, just one of handful of multi-millionaires that make up that group, looking to increase their portfolios while exponentially degrading everyone else's daily life in a 5-mile radius.
The Waterson and Westport road traffic can’t handle additional vehicles. The neighborhoods and infrastructure isn’t developed for this many additional residents.
Too much traffic in this area as it is.
Opposes the project
I am opposed to the density of the proposed construction project at Ridgeway Av and Westport Road. The area is appropriate for single family residences only.
I definitely oppose these apartments. Traffic will be a nightmare. The size is hideous!!! This will ultimately reduce housing prices in St Matthews. I also see crime rate rising. An absolute nightmare. Our police department would need to increase staff and hardly see then now. Absolutely NO!!!
Too tall does not fit the neighborhood and too much added traffic to an already congested area.
This area is losing green space at a rapid rate. Roads have been widened and traffic is still dangerously heavy. This many apartments in a small space will only make it worse.
I oppose the plan which will add more traffic to West Port Road and I am oppose the loss of green space in our city.
Traffic concerns: VA Hospital already underway- traffic already increased as infrastructure is not in place, this is causing massive delays Additional population adds these traffic concerns: 264 east, Exit 22 - Lanes for Rt 22, & Northeast/ & Southwest Rt 42 - these lanes will cause disruptions in traffic flow due to oncoming ramp from Westport Road/ exit 21. 264 East to ramp 71 North Westport Road, SR 1447 at exit 21 on 264 Westport Road, SR 1447 Northeast & Southwest
I oppose this plan.
I do not want the Gilman Point project in my backyard!
NO to this rezoning project , we can’t keep squeezing in these large projects on every square foot of green space. NO! Who wants more traffic, pollution and apartments in such a small space?
I oppose Gilmans project on Westport rd
PLEASE STOP NOW!!! This is WHY, we want to move from St. Matthews area ASAP if 296 apartments are built. HAVE YOU SEE MIDDLETOWN behind Walmart? GO LOOK!
Traffic is terrible in this area, especially certain times of the day-especially when Trinity starts and gets out. Adding all the extra cars would be a nightmare!
I oppose the apartments
Don’t allow zoning change at “ Gilman’s Point
I am very opposed to the development of additional apartments at Gilman Point. Way too much traffic now. We don’t need mode!
They had to widen Westport Rd already because of heavy traffic. We do not need another traffic problem. The circular drive will not solve the problem. This plan will bring our property values down. A high rise does not go with the areas aesthetics.
There are far more reasons not to construct a 3 story bldg to house 300 residences that own 1-2 vehicles on a 2-lane Rd that dead-ends into a small commercial lot & a RR unless of course you are the developer, a conglomerate, just one of handful of multi-millionaires that make up that group, looking to increase their portfolios while exponentially degrading everyone else's daily life in a 5-mile radius.