Let Bryson residents conserve water with xeriscaping
59 Comments
K
Kelli Childre
3 years ago
This yard looks much more well kept and maintained than the yards with grown up grass and weeds overpowering flower beds and trims left I trimmed!
S
Sarah Morris
3 years ago
While I do believe in the formal process of getting HOA approval prior to changing the aesthetic of our homes/yards I am disheartened to see our HOA not working with a homeowner to help resolve an issue. Xeriscaping is needed and I think it looks wonderful. We are constantly on water restrictions and I think on this case, the good completely outweighs the bad.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
I support xeriscaping . It should be allowed for all houses so we can conserve water. I'd saw gravel is a better look than dead grass
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
I support zero scaping . It should be mandated for all houses so we can conserve water
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
I support the petition
A
Adan Rodriguez
3 years ago
Given the water shortage homeowners should be allowed to conserve water by xeriscaping.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
I'm a resident on Judge Fisk Ct.
M
Maria Gatling
3 years ago
Bryson should be leading the way for environmental needs.
A
Assiya Kalykova
3 years ago
To me this looks great.
And should be approved.
C
Chris Gwaldo
3 years ago
I support this 100%
B
Bethany Walton
3 years ago
Fully support xeriscaping
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
It’s illegal for our community to prohibit water conservation landscaping! This restriction needs to change!
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Allow xeriscaped yards to help conserve water!
B
Benjamin Musil
3 years ago
I'm a Bryson resident. This looks better than half the lawns in the neighborhood. Actually, it's probably in the top 10% of the house fronts I admire. If this was denied, then what exactly would meet approval standards?
Very interested in this as I also don't like constantly watering the lawn just to keep it alive and would love to do at least some partial xeriscaping. 1/3 of our backyard space is xeriscaped.
J
Justin Huddleston
3 years ago
Featured
I believe our climate is changing to become hotter and drier in central Texas. Every effort to conserve water will help our community in the long run. Our HOA supports using native plants to conserve water so why do they “require” thirsty non-native grass?
K
Kenneth Gindrup
3 years ago
The Bryson grass requirement is ridiculous!
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
We need more xeriscaping!!
J
Jeannie yu
3 years ago
I really not understand why we have to form a petition and have a meeting for a issue that is a not necessary. Removing grass and making the front yard more appealing and draught tolerant and saving water should encouraged and not something we have fight for. It is wasting money and time for everyone!
L
Lauren Martin
3 years ago
Let the residents choose their own landscape option for their lifestyle and home!
S
Shajuanne Haire
3 years ago
Residents should be able to choose cost efficient and conservative ways for yard scaping. Our house, our community, our money, our choices!!
This yard looks much more well kept and maintained than the yards with grown up grass and weeds overpowering flower beds and trims left I trimmed!
While I do believe in the formal process of getting HOA approval prior to changing the aesthetic of our homes/yards I am disheartened to see our HOA not working with a homeowner to help resolve an issue. Xeriscaping is needed and I think it looks wonderful. We are constantly on water restrictions and I think on this case, the good completely outweighs the bad.
I support xeriscaping . It should be allowed for all houses so we can conserve water. I'd saw gravel is a better look than dead grass
I support zero scaping . It should be mandated for all houses so we can conserve water
I support the petition
Given the water shortage homeowners should be allowed to conserve water by xeriscaping.
I'm a resident on Judge Fisk Ct.
Bryson should be leading the way for environmental needs.
To me this looks great. And should be approved.
I support this 100%
Fully support xeriscaping
It’s illegal for our community to prohibit water conservation landscaping! This restriction needs to change!
Allow xeriscaped yards to help conserve water!
I'm a Bryson resident. This looks better than half the lawns in the neighborhood. Actually, it's probably in the top 10% of the house fronts I admire. If this was denied, then what exactly would meet approval standards? Very interested in this as I also don't like constantly watering the lawn just to keep it alive and would love to do at least some partial xeriscaping. 1/3 of our backyard space is xeriscaped.
I believe our climate is changing to become hotter and drier in central Texas. Every effort to conserve water will help our community in the long run. Our HOA supports using native plants to conserve water so why do they “require” thirsty non-native grass?
The Bryson grass requirement is ridiculous!
We need more xeriscaping!!
I really not understand why we have to form a petition and have a meeting for a issue that is a not necessary. Removing grass and making the front yard more appealing and draught tolerant and saving water should encouraged and not something we have fight for. It is wasting money and time for everyone!
Let the residents choose their own landscape option for their lifestyle and home!
Residents should be able to choose cost efficient and conservative ways for yard scaping. Our house, our community, our money, our choices!!