Branan Field Master Plan Future Use Density Increase
108 Comments
R
Robert Boucher
9 years ago
I am against this proposal.
N
Nicole Massung
9 years ago
Keep the area as a future school!
M
Melissa Jackson
9 years ago
I OPPOSE these changes!
R
Roy Brand
9 years ago
OPPOSED
J
John dembowski
9 years ago
We both oppose these proposed changes.
V
VICTORIA SNOW
9 years ago
66027
D
David R Williams
9 years ago
N/A
T
Todd Treon
9 years ago
Featured
We are lacking in several areas that were promised. Including the "pop-up" parks have not been finished or maintained, nor have benches with shaded areas at the play grounds been addressed, and an expanded amenity center has not been addressed either.
R
Ricky L Gooding
9 years ago
We do not approve of this use for the land
C
Christina Wilder
9 years ago
We are already lacking in amenity areas . We need another pool and so on . Not more homes . Where is the soccer field we were promised or the second pool
F
Francia Maestas
9 years ago
We are already at full capacity we do not need to add additional homes.
T
Terri Gooding
9 years ago
Against the proposed use of land.
J
Jessica Wright
9 years ago
Our facilities are lacking. It is not big enough for the community we have now. Everytime i went to the gym something was broken. We need to fix what we currently have and need to expand as well. Not big enough for additional people in the community.
J
John Green
9 years ago
As a homeowner in Two Creeks for over 6 years, my family does not want to see this type of development in our neighborhood. Please deny this request to rezone the land!
W
William Wood
9 years ago
We are at maximum capacity for all amenities already.
R
Richard Descoteaux
9 years ago
32068
D
Doris Herron
9 years ago
32068
J
JORGE SEDA
9 years ago
32068
R
Richard Toohey
9 years ago
NO we need them to complete pocket parks and replace trees, make additional amenities before we grow bigger.
M
Melissa Brusoe
9 years ago
I do not feel that our community will benefit from these proposed changes. We are already busting at the ssense so to speak with our undersized amenity enter.
I am against this proposal.
Keep the area as a future school!
I OPPOSE these changes!
OPPOSED
We both oppose these proposed changes.
66027
N/A
We are lacking in several areas that were promised. Including the "pop-up" parks have not been finished or maintained, nor have benches with shaded areas at the play grounds been addressed, and an expanded amenity center has not been addressed either.
We do not approve of this use for the land
We are already lacking in amenity areas . We need another pool and so on . Not more homes . Where is the soccer field we were promised or the second pool
We are already at full capacity we do not need to add additional homes.
Against the proposed use of land.
Our facilities are lacking. It is not big enough for the community we have now. Everytime i went to the gym something was broken. We need to fix what we currently have and need to expand as well. Not big enough for additional people in the community.
As a homeowner in Two Creeks for over 6 years, my family does not want to see this type of development in our neighborhood. Please deny this request to rezone the land!
We are at maximum capacity for all amenities already.
32068
32068
32068
NO we need them to complete pocket parks and replace trees, make additional amenities before we grow bigger.
I do not feel that our community will benefit from these proposed changes. We are already busting at the ssense so to speak with our undersized amenity enter.