Skip to main content

Against Research-Aligned Scenario (option b) Regarding Wayzata School Start Time Considerations

134 Comments

A
Anu
10 years ago

School time 9.00am or 9.10 am

F
Frances Hsia
10 years ago

7:30 am start time for elementary kids is too early. I prefer hybrid option c.

S
sasikala
10 years ago

Against Plan B proposal . I request the authorities to drop plan B. I feel that if they start go with Plan B, then our little kids will be taking bus even before they see the sunlight during winter. I can't even imagine such a scenario. Also,consider their healthy sleeping time and safety too.

C
Christina Kim
10 years ago

7:30 AM is way too early for little kids to start. It is not healthy for them!

G
Gopal Dey
10 years ago

I am strongly against option 'B' of starting the elementary schools start time of 7:30AM as by doing this I do not see any benefit to small kids and parents. This spoils everything like sleeping time, family time, home work time, after school activities, very dangerous to wait at bus stop before 7AM in heavy winter and after all these family where both parents are working have to spend $4000/year per kid in after school day care. In my opinion this will screw up everything.

S
Susmita Bhuyan
10 years ago

I am strongly against the district's plan B proposal of starting all elementary schools at 7:30. I think the current 9:10 start time is perfect for elementary kids and it should not be changed, at least not be pushed any earlier than 8:45. The younger kids need more sleep (10-11 hours of sleep) than the older kids, and their natural wake up time is between 7 and 8. They will have a hard time in school if they are forced to wake up at 6, they will not perform well and not be happy. It is also not good for their health and growth. They will be waiting for the bus in the dark in snowy and bitterly cold winter days. Also school dismissal at 2:10 is immensely problematic for families with two working parents. They have to pay for significant extra $ for after school care, and quality family time is taken away since they have to go to bed between 7 to 8. When they will sleep so early home work can not be done. After school program taking will be difficult as they can not be picked up at 3 or 3.30PM as parents will be in the office.Please do not compromise the health and well-being of our younger kids as they build the foundation for future success.

S
steve
10 years ago

No to option B Yes to status quo until we find a win/win solution. We have strong concerns over SAFETY and less quality family time under proposed scenario B.

J
Juveria Feroz
10 years ago

Let the little angels get decent sleep. Don't screw them up over this tooooo.

S
Susmitha Kothareddy
10 years ago

I am against the district's plan B proposal of starting all elementary schools at 7:30. I think the current 9:10 start time is perfect for elementary kids and it should not be changed, at least not be pushed any earlier than 8:45. The younger kids need more sleep (10-11 hours of sleep). Please do not compromise the health and well-being of our younger kids as they build the foundation for future success.

C
Chandrasekhar R Kothareddy
10 years ago

I am strongly against the district's plan B proposal of starting all elementary schools at 7:30. I think the current 9:10 start time is perfect for elementary kids and it should not be changed, at least not be pushed any earlier than 8:45. The younger kids need more sleep (10-11 hours of sleep) than the older kids, and their natural wake up time is between 7 and 8. They will have a hard time in school if they are forced to wake up at 6, they will not perform well and not be happy. It is also not good for their health and growth. They will be waiting for the bus in the dark in snowy and bitterly cold winter days. Also school dismissal at 2:10 is immensely problematic for families with two working parents. They have to pay for significant extra $ for after school care, and quality family time is taken away since they have to go to bed between 7 to 8. When they will sleep so early home work can not be done. After school program taking will be difficult as they can not be picked up at 3 or 3.30PM as parents will be in the office.Please do not compromise the health and well-being of our younger kids as they build the foundation for future success.

T
Tao Li
10 years ago

The new time is too early for little kids. The current starting time of 9AM is good.

S
Susmita Bhuyan
10 years ago

I am strongly against the district's plan B proposal of starting all elementary schools at 7:30. I think the current 9:10 start time is perfect for elementary kids and it should not be changed, at least not be pushed any earlier than 8:45. The younger kids need more sleep (10-11 hours of sleep) than the older kids, and their natural wake up time is between 7 and 8. They will have a hard time in school if they are forced to wake up at 6, they will not perform well and not be happy. It is also not good for their health and growth. They will be waiting for the bus in the dark in snowy and bitterly cold winter days. Also school dismissal at 2:10 is immensely problematic for families with two working parents. They have to pay for significant extra $ for after school care, and quality family time is taken away since they have to go to bed between 7 to 8. When they will sleep so early home work can not be done. After school program taking will be difficult as they can not be picked up at 3 or 3.30PM as parents will be in the office.Please do not compromise the health and well-being of our younger kids as they build the foundation for future success.

K
Kelly Rogers
10 years ago

We need to protect our young ones. No change unless it for the good of all students.

X
Xiaoguang sun
10 years ago

Younger kids need sleep too, even more

A
Aditi Kakkar
10 years ago

This new early time will effect our child healthy and risking their safety...

R
Ravi Kiran
10 years ago

No Change to elemantary school timings !!!

E
Elena Klimchuk
10 years ago

I would agree that elementary and middle school kids need some more sleep to be more productive in school too.

S
Shufeng
10 years ago

I am strongly against the district's plan B proposal of starting all elementary schools at 7:30. I think the current 9:10 start time is perfect for elementary kids and it should not be changed, at least not be pushed any earlier than 8:30. The younger kids need more sleep (10-11 hours of sleep) than the older kids, and their natural wake up time is between 7 and 8. They will have a hard time in school if they are forced to wake up at 6, they will not perform well and not be happy. It is also not good for their health and growth. They will be waiting for the bus in the dark in snowy and bitterly cold winter days and it will be a cruel and dangerous situation for these little kids. Also school dismissal at 2:10 is immensely problematic for families with two working parents. They have to pay for significant extra $ for after school care, and quality family time is taken away since they have to go to bed between 7 to 8. Please do not compromise the health and well-being of our younger kids as they build the foundation for future success.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

I would like Greenwood and Oakwood aligned with other 6 elementary schools and start at 9am. There is no reason why these 2 should be separated out, just because of scarcity of buses. Please increase the number of buses than making kids suffer. Devise a way to make every school start beyond 8am, which is much beneficial for everyone.

A
Aaron Kolkman
10 years ago

I am in favor of the Status Quo scenario and against the Research-aligned Scenario. Further, Greenwood and Oakwood Elementary schools should be aligned with the other, later, elementary school start times. Thank you.