Skip to main content

Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

2,356 Comments

S
Simon Harding
9 years ago

More important than deciding where to destroy is recognising and safeguarding the important area's where there is a wealth of biodiversity and protecting them. This is one such area that should not be destroyed but protected at all costs. I am a regular visitor.

R
Rebecca Scammell
9 years ago

At a time where construction and technology is on the rise and peoples lives are busy and stressful, leading to less and less human interaction, its really important to preserve traditional activities, especially in small towns and villages which enable a sense of community and supports small and local businesses.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

There's enough noise and air pollution already in West Sussex... Surely there must be another option that thinks outside the square and doesn't regard the natural ecosystems and historic importance of the smaller villages of less consequence... leave the smaller villages alone and perhaps provide a coastal option that provides sea views and allows vehicle pollution to be removed by coastal winds.

M
Mick foster
9 years ago

Arundel needs a relief road

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

We go to Binstead strawberry fair and it's a lovely place. Be a shame to raze it down.

N
Nicola Perkins
9 years ago

Save our beautiful countryside!!!

H
Hilary Gould
9 years ago

I endorse the petition not to build the Arundel bypass through Binsted village.

D
Dpd1984
9 years ago

The planning needs to be looked into much further. I'm sure there is a stretch of land, where the bypass would be less invasive.

A
Ann Dawson
9 years ago

This route needs to be abandoned as it will destroy much needed important wildlife habitat

S
Steve Clark
9 years ago

If there's a better alternative route it has to be used

R
Roland Zilz
9 years ago

Looking at the options I don't understand why the Binsted option is even being considered. It seems most likely to be the most expensive as well as the most destructive.

J
Jo
9 years ago

Please pick somewhere that affects less wildlife!

E
Ellie
9 years ago

Need to protect our local wildlife and habitats as much as possible. So this can't happen.

S
Sheryl
9 years ago

I Think sort out single carriageway between The White Swan pub & corssbush first

C
Chris Adam - Smith
9 years ago

Protect our countryside!

V
Val Challis
9 years ago

It would be a disaster.

S
Stuart Elms
9 years ago Featured

Other options, less damaging to countryside and villages, should be brought to public consultation. The Arundel A27 Forum suggests a partly-online option with a short bypass and anti-severance measures. This should be included in the public consultation.

J
Jane mote
9 years ago

Build roads and cars will come. This will only push traffic into a bottleneck somewhere else. Look at more creative, greener solutions,

M
matt dickinson
9 years ago

Not necessary and will permanently damage the countryside. What about the green and pleasant land??

L
Les Frampton
9 years ago

Any plan to destroy a village and the countryside should be avoided