Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
T
Tom Weller
8 years ago
There would seem to be far better solutions to this transport issue than running a bypass through Binsted Village
V
Vivien
8 years ago
Please look at other options that do less damage to our architectural and natural heritage.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Needless destruction .
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Stupid option to keep building more roads. Let's invest in public transport
B
Brendan Nelson
8 years ago
Binsted is a beautiful environment and its needless destruction would be a tragedy.
A
Andrea G
8 years ago
Please consider the wildlife as well as the village! One decision that cannot be reversed.
J
Janet Wickings
8 years ago
Please save the woods, they are beautiful and part of our history.
E
Emma Herian
8 years ago
The woods are precious to all, human, wildlife and nature. #SaveOurForests
R
Russell Leslie
8 years ago
Not when there is a less destructive route.
A
Andrew Durling
8 years ago
I have often visited the area and can appreciate its stunning beauty and wildlife. Why destroy more of our precious countryside?
G
Gail Pickett
8 years ago
More roads merely leads to more traffic leading to more roads leading to....
J
Jeremy Mortimer
8 years ago
This route would blast through an area of outstanding natural beauty.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Oppose Binstead bypass. Think bypass coming out at Ford would be a waste of time and money as needs to come out on dual carriageway. Still feel Worthing needs to be addressed first as fixing Arundel will make it worse.
F
Frances Crunden
8 years ago
Once beautiful countryside is lost it can never be reclaimed.
Just because this route may appear to be the right option because of its proximity to Arundel, ...out of sight ... Out of mind ...doesn't make it ecologically or environmentally right.
G
Gillian Fowler
8 years ago
Tearing the heart out of a historic village and its people, destroying beautiful woodland and countryside, destroying important habitats for wildlife, lost forever.
D
dawn
8 years ago
The shortest route, would be the most practical and the most affordable, as well as having the less impact on fragile natural environments.
A
Andy Davey
8 years ago
Having lived in Binsted for 12 years and still in the local area I am discussed at the thought of Option 5A. In fact i don't like any of the options if I had to choose it would option 1 and slowing the traffic down which would immediately aid congestion. The Oak trees the local residents and wildlife are all at risk.....this is concerning many people and actually ruining people lives.
S
Simon Pierce
8 years ago
Totally oppose the Binsted route.
P
Piers paget
8 years ago
Instead of ruining what's left of our beauty woodland areas and sacred villages, I strongly suggest going ahead with option 1 which is more eco friendly and doesn't affect the good folk of Binsted village and surrounding areas.
I
ian rioberts
8 years ago
Just kicking the Can down the road. Alleviate here, the congestion moves somewhere else. Does our Countryside stand for nothing.
There would seem to be far better solutions to this transport issue than running a bypass through Binsted Village
Please look at other options that do less damage to our architectural and natural heritage.
Needless destruction .
Stupid option to keep building more roads. Let's invest in public transport
Binsted is a beautiful environment and its needless destruction would be a tragedy.
Please consider the wildlife as well as the village! One decision that cannot be reversed.
Please save the woods, they are beautiful and part of our history.
The woods are precious to all, human, wildlife and nature. #SaveOurForests
Not when there is a less destructive route.
I have often visited the area and can appreciate its stunning beauty and wildlife. Why destroy more of our precious countryside?
More roads merely leads to more traffic leading to more roads leading to....
This route would blast through an area of outstanding natural beauty.
Oppose Binstead bypass. Think bypass coming out at Ford would be a waste of time and money as needs to come out on dual carriageway. Still feel Worthing needs to be addressed first as fixing Arundel will make it worse.
Once beautiful countryside is lost it can never be reclaimed. Just because this route may appear to be the right option because of its proximity to Arundel, ...out of sight ... Out of mind ...doesn't make it ecologically or environmentally right.
Tearing the heart out of a historic village and its people, destroying beautiful woodland and countryside, destroying important habitats for wildlife, lost forever.
The shortest route, would be the most practical and the most affordable, as well as having the less impact on fragile natural environments.
Having lived in Binsted for 12 years and still in the local area I am discussed at the thought of Option 5A. In fact i don't like any of the options if I had to choose it would option 1 and slowing the traffic down which would immediately aid congestion. The Oak trees the local residents and wildlife are all at risk.....this is concerning many people and actually ruining people lives.
Totally oppose the Binsted route.
Instead of ruining what's left of our beauty woodland areas and sacred villages, I strongly suggest going ahead with option 1 which is more eco friendly and doesn't affect the good folk of Binsted village and surrounding areas.
Just kicking the Can down the road. Alleviate here, the congestion moves somewhere else. Does our Countryside stand for nothing.