Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

Whilst I wholly reject HE's Option 5a for the unrepairable damage it would do to an area of unique ecological and archaeological importance; I cannot support the Arundel A27 Forum's proposals and without any alternative would favour Option 3

Do nothing

I used to live and work in Binsted for nearly ten years, why spoil the countryside and ancient woodland, take another route

An improved A27 without pinch-points is the answer, and at such low cost, should at least be tried.

Arundel by pass yes, but not through Binsted it is not necessary.

I do not have an email address of my own but ABNC can contact me through Ratpack Archers club if any verification of my signature is needed

More investment in the railways and public transport is required in this country, not in yet more roads, particularly roads through areas such as this. Shortsighted, to put it mildly

The age of the motor car is over. It is now, more than ever, senseless and counter-productive to spend more money and destroy more land building more roads.

Unspoilt and tranquil country for humans and for wildlife are very prescious , indeed , invaluable . Please find another way .

Please protect this area of outstanding natural beauty by building a shorty bypass Yours sincerely Olivia Outred

I am against the Binsted route option for an A27 Arundel Bypass. This route would permanently destroy an historic area with rare ancient woodland. The token planting of new trees as part of re landscaping does not replace like for like. I would prefer to see more sensitive methods of traffic management rather than a destructive bypass. I suspect all this is driven by commercial demands rather than domestic car usage. It is commercial road haulage which poses the most serious threat to our environment. Once destroyed, special habitats are lost forever and the traffic congestion is simply shifted along to another bottleneck. This represents very poor planning which is not in the best interests of the local residents or the local environment.

Against options 3 and 5a as they impact Binsted and National Park, support option 1 as more closely follows existing road

I use the woodlands as a recreation site and as a member of the archery club, The destruction of mature woodland is all too easily achieved and destroys hundreds of years of history and environmental stability. I would rather suffer the over crowded roads as need of a car is a passing phase as this electronic communication evidences.

There is no possible excuse in 2017 to not have the knowledge about climate change and the burning of fossil fuels with it's link to increased vehicle use. Why not invest in a tram line? More environmentally friendly buses with cheap fares? Cycle lanes? Flexible working hours? All this destruction for what? To save one person sitting in a traffic jam for ten minutes? We have to re-think transport and protect our National Park snd precious places such as Binstead Village. Before our children condemn us for the ignorant vandals we appear to be.

I support Option 1 as it has the least impact on the ancient woodlands and areas of natural beauty. However improvements to the present design for the Ford roundabout must be considered.

New fast roads should never bisect a village, it makes village coherence and life impossible. Binstead woods are also ancient woodlands, and@although the@shoddily produced maps for the bypass have omitted to show them, they too are in line for destruction if this option goes ahead. Ancient woodland and village life matter to me, even though I don't live in them.

This is a beautiful historic village in an environment of great importance to wildlife.

Reject any off-line option. Support part on-line with short bypass and existing bridge over Arun.

Thoroughly reject the route going through Binsted village. Makes no sense to destroy such beautiful countryside when there are other options available with less impact on the surrounding environment.

Truly disappointing that such beautiful areas and peaceful villages would be sacrificed for a road. Our environment is far more important. Take note for future generations, once it is done it cannot be undone. Such a selfish proposal all for a road.