Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

Surely the best option is to improve the existing road as much as possible and to not destroy community and countryside.

Don't destroy more countryside, we need to keep this precious land for future generations

I strongly concur with the comments of Sussex Wildlife Trust, route 5A would result in the destruction of a massive amount of ancient woodland and priceless habitat.

Considering the various options it seems to me that Option 1 would be my preferred route. Improving existing roads as far as possible, rather than irreversibly despoiling precious, natural environments has to be a better course of action.

This is not the right route. The other options are the only viable ones.

To damage this much historic woodland is a terrible mistake. Beautiful countryside and endangered species. If this was an individual trying to get around these facts there is no way they would be considered.

I am strongly opposed to the 5A option as it would do far too much damage to Binsted Woods, would radically transform the ancient landscape for the worse, and would cause permanent , irreparable damage to the ancient village of Binsted.

This would be an absolute act of vandalism with ancient trees destroyed, rare animals displaced and a complete eyesore in the surrounding area.

We are custodians of the future and need to protect ancient woodland, and historic sites for future generations.

No to 5a Save Binstead

I am voting for option 1

No ancient woodland or meadow land should be destroyed to make new roads. Full stop. Better and cheaper nationalised rail services should be the priority.

No way should this go through - my grandfather would turn in his grave

Please save this community and landscape. The other options are far less impactful on the landscape and culture.

Please don't ruin our history our nature and our wildlife .this area needs to be protected we have plenty brown ares of land that can be used but please put you're bypass in the least possible invasive place . Once the wildlife and beautiful forest is gone , then it's too late , please lease this area alone , it should. E protected for future generations

The proposed Arundel bypass is an act of environmental vandalism destroying the few remaining vestiges of our green and pleasant land. The prospect of a polluted traffic -congested dirty smelly noisy unpleasant alternative must be fought with a determined NO! and NEVER!

Arundel does not warrant a bypass especialy at the sacrifice of irreplaceable countryside with an abundance of rare species once its gone its gone

Ridiculous waste of countryside and money as Chichester bypass has been cancelled.

Don't destroy enviroment

Leave our countryside and wildlife alone - we are not more important than them and people need to start realising this.