Skip to main content

Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

2,356 Comments

S
Sara Walker
8 years ago

Option 5A will destroy places of natural beauty and our wonderful wildlife! Why is this generation determined to destroy everything green!

A
Andrea Faggiani
8 years ago

#saveBinsted

N
Neil Pattinson
8 years ago

Unnecessarily destructive - Option 1 is adequate, and better value for money.

S
Scott
8 years ago

Just leave the countryside alone We do not need any more bypass

E
Emma Faggiani
8 years ago

Save Binsted village!

L
Laura Hockenhull
8 years ago

I believe that this is an unacceptable plan to destroy land of significant historical and ecological importance.

M
Michael Mannion
8 years ago

Typical English village which is unfortunately fast disappearing from the English countryside.Pleas keep Binsted as pretty as it is today forever!

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Absolutely against this, it'll ruin so many small businesses and homes that have been loved for years.

I
Ian White
8 years ago

The congestion caused at Crossbush needs a solution, but constructing a bypass on this scale through beautiful countryside and our villages is unnecessary.

C
Claire Gale
8 years ago

Binsted is a beautiful local village, a wonderful home to many. Option 5a is an abhorrent disregard of a local area, wildlife, way of life and community on all levels. Complete disregard for rural Britain sets an ignorant and unhealthy precedent. Damage done can never be rolled back. Option 5a is not an option at all.

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

I've worked in Binsted for several years and would be very sad to see the village torn apart. A new by-pass would only move the congestion problem further along the A27 leaving an ugly scar on this beautiful part of the countryside.

H
Hayley ohare
8 years ago

I think saving ancient woodland, rural villages and peoples homes is far more important than another road. Maybe consider investing the vast sum of money for the proposed bypass will cost into reliable affordable regular public transport ?

A
Andy Waitw
8 years ago

Please don't destroy this wonderful rural idyll - it is not worth sacrificing our green and pleasant land for the sake of bigger roads that only encourage more cars until you end up with the same problem down the line.

G
George McLauchlan
8 years ago

Please approve option 1. The least damaging to our gradually diminishing countryside

C
Carl
8 years ago

Save Binsted

J
Johanna Coates
8 years ago

Please leave our lovely Binsted village alone

C
Clare copur
8 years ago

We cannot afford to lose anymore wildlife , when is it going to end , in my lifetime we have lost 50% of our wildlife, scary thought !!

K
Kate Buckle
8 years ago

please carefully consider everything that will be affected by this bypass. you will never be able to turn back the clock.

M
Michael Davis
8 years ago

Do not forever destroy the precious landscape of Binsted for an unsustainable transport policy.

A
Alana King
8 years ago

All of the options aren't ideal, destroying the ancient woodland in some way but this is the worst of the lot. We have so little left of our ancient woodland and it is so incredibly important to the ecosystem and biodiversity of our area. I recognise there is an issue with bottlenecking through Arundel but there really does have to be another way of solving this without ruining our surrounding countryside.