Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
S
Sara Walker
8 years ago
Option 5A will destroy places of natural beauty and our wonderful wildlife! Why is this generation determined to destroy everything green!
A
Andrea Faggiani
8 years ago
#saveBinsted
N
Neil Pattinson
8 years ago
Unnecessarily destructive - Option 1 is adequate, and better value for money.
S
Scott
8 years ago
Just leave the countryside alone We do not need any more bypass
E
Emma Faggiani
8 years ago
Save Binsted village!
L
Laura Hockenhull
8 years ago
I believe that this is an unacceptable plan to destroy land of significant historical and ecological importance.
M
Michael Mannion
8 years ago
Typical English village which is unfortunately fast disappearing from the English countryside.Pleas keep Binsted as pretty as it is today forever!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Absolutely against this, it'll ruin so many small businesses and homes that have been loved for years.
I
Ian White
8 years ago
The congestion caused at Crossbush needs a solution, but constructing a bypass on this scale through beautiful countryside and our villages is unnecessary.
C
Claire Gale
8 years ago
Binsted is a beautiful local village, a wonderful home to many. Option 5a is an abhorrent disregard of a local area, wildlife, way of life and community on all levels. Complete disregard for rural Britain sets an ignorant and unhealthy precedent. Damage done can never be rolled back. Option 5a is not an option at all.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I've worked in Binsted for several years and would be very sad to see the village torn apart. A new by-pass would only move the congestion problem further along the A27 leaving an ugly scar on this beautiful part of the countryside.
H
Hayley ohare
8 years ago
I think saving ancient woodland, rural villages and peoples homes is far more important than another road.
Maybe consider investing the vast sum of money for the proposed bypass will cost into reliable affordable regular public transport ?
A
Andy Waitw
8 years ago
Please don't destroy this wonderful rural idyll - it is not worth sacrificing our green and pleasant land for the sake of bigger roads that only encourage more cars until you end up with the same problem down the line.
G
George McLauchlan
8 years ago
Please approve option 1. The least damaging to our gradually diminishing countryside
C
Carl
8 years ago
Save Binsted
J
Johanna Coates
8 years ago
Please leave our lovely Binsted village alone
C
Clare copur
8 years ago
We cannot afford to lose anymore wildlife , when is it going to end , in my lifetime we have lost 50% of our wildlife, scary thought !!
K
Kate Buckle
8 years ago
please carefully consider everything that will be affected by this bypass. you will never be able to turn back the clock.
M
Michael Davis
8 years ago
Do not forever destroy the precious landscape of Binsted for an unsustainable transport policy.
A
Alana King
8 years ago
All of the options aren't ideal, destroying the ancient woodland in some way but this is the worst of the lot. We have so little left of our ancient woodland and it is so incredibly important to the ecosystem and biodiversity of our area. I recognise there is an issue with bottlenecking through Arundel but there really does have to be another way of solving this without ruining our surrounding countryside.
Option 5A will destroy places of natural beauty and our wonderful wildlife! Why is this generation determined to destroy everything green!
#saveBinsted
Unnecessarily destructive - Option 1 is adequate, and better value for money.
Just leave the countryside alone We do not need any more bypass
Save Binsted village!
I believe that this is an unacceptable plan to destroy land of significant historical and ecological importance.
Typical English village which is unfortunately fast disappearing from the English countryside.Pleas keep Binsted as pretty as it is today forever!
Absolutely against this, it'll ruin so many small businesses and homes that have been loved for years.
The congestion caused at Crossbush needs a solution, but constructing a bypass on this scale through beautiful countryside and our villages is unnecessary.
Binsted is a beautiful local village, a wonderful home to many. Option 5a is an abhorrent disregard of a local area, wildlife, way of life and community on all levels. Complete disregard for rural Britain sets an ignorant and unhealthy precedent. Damage done can never be rolled back. Option 5a is not an option at all.
I've worked in Binsted for several years and would be very sad to see the village torn apart. A new by-pass would only move the congestion problem further along the A27 leaving an ugly scar on this beautiful part of the countryside.
I think saving ancient woodland, rural villages and peoples homes is far more important than another road. Maybe consider investing the vast sum of money for the proposed bypass will cost into reliable affordable regular public transport ?
Please don't destroy this wonderful rural idyll - it is not worth sacrificing our green and pleasant land for the sake of bigger roads that only encourage more cars until you end up with the same problem down the line.
Please approve option 1. The least damaging to our gradually diminishing countryside
Save Binsted
Please leave our lovely Binsted village alone
We cannot afford to lose anymore wildlife , when is it going to end , in my lifetime we have lost 50% of our wildlife, scary thought !!
please carefully consider everything that will be affected by this bypass. you will never be able to turn back the clock.
Do not forever destroy the precious landscape of Binsted for an unsustainable transport policy.
All of the options aren't ideal, destroying the ancient woodland in some way but this is the worst of the lot. We have so little left of our ancient woodland and it is so incredibly important to the ecosystem and biodiversity of our area. I recognise there is an issue with bottlenecking through Arundel but there really does have to be another way of solving this without ruining our surrounding countryside.