Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
N
Nicola Reese
8 years ago
Does this government want the entire country covered in concrete?
J
Julie Russ
8 years ago
This route would cause wanton and needless destruction. There are much better options, and Michael Gove should put his money where his mouth is.
C
Chris Kitson
8 years ago
More roads create more traffic. The road building ideology is defunct. Invest the money on transport that gets polluting cars off the road and improves our quality of life.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
5a will encourage new long-diSTANCE commuting
R
Rwth Hunt
8 years ago
The locals know best what will work.
N
Neil Medlicott
8 years ago
Let's hope that common sense prevails and the planners take another look at this.
S
Sophie Larsen
8 years ago
Short-sighted, damaging and stupid. More roads create more traffic, more pollution, destroys wildlife. Just stop. Stop ruining the planet.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
This proposal should be reviewed for less impact on virgin countryside in a National Park.
M
Maurice Knowles
8 years ago
Lived in Tortington for 40 years but now moved. I don't think building more roads is the answer to road construction!
P
Paul Jeacock
8 years ago
environmentally the wrong decision. listen to the locals.
G
Guy Hunter
8 years ago
What a ridiculous idea, in this day and age we must be able to come up with a better solution that doesn’t lead to the destruction of woodland, ancient or otherwise, the destruction of natural habitats and wildlife.
J
Janet McKeag
8 years ago
No to Option 5A! The UK is 189th out of 215 countries when it comes to bio diversity ( The State of Report 2016 ). The report was complied from statistics provided by 53 organisations.
A
Austen Cooper
8 years ago
They shall not Bypass! ;-)
M
Maureen Hunter
8 years ago
Slaughter the countryside? Travel faster into profiteering Armageddon.
Choose better!
D
Deborah Ridley
8 years ago
No bypass on this beautiful historic land! Appallingly ! We need countryside- not more horrible roads.
G
Geoffrey Course
8 years ago
The consultation was biased. Spend that amount on option 1 with a dual carrigeway flyover, over the Ford Rd roundabout and you have halved the congestion. And provide new access side roads for the properties either side of the new road.
S
Stephen Sheppard
8 years ago
Option 1 looks best , there is already a single lane bypass , expand that by building a parallel two lane road .
D
Diane Burns
8 years ago
We need areas like this to be saved, there are enough bloody roads now! We need nature more than ever
A
Andrew Leng
8 years ago
Save green space
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
We must preserve our wildlife first and for our kids futures. There are other options for the bypass so why not choose win-win?
Does this government want the entire country covered in concrete?
This route would cause wanton and needless destruction. There are much better options, and Michael Gove should put his money where his mouth is.
More roads create more traffic. The road building ideology is defunct. Invest the money on transport that gets polluting cars off the road and improves our quality of life.
5a will encourage new long-diSTANCE commuting
The locals know best what will work.
Let's hope that common sense prevails and the planners take another look at this.
Short-sighted, damaging and stupid. More roads create more traffic, more pollution, destroys wildlife. Just stop. Stop ruining the planet.
This proposal should be reviewed for less impact on virgin countryside in a National Park.
Lived in Tortington for 40 years but now moved. I don't think building more roads is the answer to road construction!
environmentally the wrong decision. listen to the locals.
What a ridiculous idea, in this day and age we must be able to come up with a better solution that doesn’t lead to the destruction of woodland, ancient or otherwise, the destruction of natural habitats and wildlife.
No to Option 5A! The UK is 189th out of 215 countries when it comes to bio diversity ( The State of Report 2016 ). The report was complied from statistics provided by 53 organisations.
They shall not Bypass! ;-)
Slaughter the countryside? Travel faster into profiteering Armageddon. Choose better!
No bypass on this beautiful historic land! Appallingly ! We need countryside- not more horrible roads.
The consultation was biased. Spend that amount on option 1 with a dual carrigeway flyover, over the Ford Rd roundabout and you have halved the congestion. And provide new access side roads for the properties either side of the new road.
Option 1 looks best , there is already a single lane bypass , expand that by building a parallel two lane road .
We need areas like this to be saved, there are enough bloody roads now! We need nature more than ever
Save green space
We must preserve our wildlife first and for our kids futures. There are other options for the bypass so why not choose win-win?