Skip to main content

Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

2,356 Comments

C
Charlotte Vohtz
7 years ago

Another solution is required- we need to protect our wildlife...

I
Ian Taylor
7 years ago

The proposed Option 5A will have wide-ranging and devastating impacts on the native fauna and flora in this area - wildlife that has evolved over millennia will be wiped out at a stroke. Other, less damaging options are available and must be chosen to protect out heritage for future generations

C
craig grynich
7 years ago

find another option other then destroying more woodland

E
Emily Taylor
7 years ago

This is so sad, Arundel is so beautiful.

D
David Sinclair
7 years ago

Option 5A must be rejected to save the ancient woodland

M
martin p lansley
7 years ago

The A27 Arundel Bypass proposal will increase air and noise pollution within a unique area of natural beauty destroying forever a treasured iconic landscape and vital green lung. This irresponsible proposal threatens the physical and mental health of present and future generations.

A
ANNA F LANSLEY
7 years ago

AN ENVIRONMENTAL DISASTER

J
Jane Wildeboer
7 years ago

Once it's gone, it's gone forever. Our countryside is more valuable than ever, offering a refuge from the increasingly overcrowded environment, as well as habitat for our precious wildlife. Stop building houses!! Houses = more cars = overcrowded roads = the need for bypasses. Can't help but feel that someone's getting mighty rich from all this building - and society will suffer as a result. STOP!!!

J
J Plumstead
7 years ago

Option 5a should not be built. It will sever wildlife corridors which are vital for the movement of wildlife and will result in the fragmentation of the remaining habitat. It will also destroy 10h if ancient woodland considered to be the best on the south coast plain - you can’t mitigate against this loss of habitat.

D
Diana
7 years ago

Save this beautiful woodlands and all its wildlife who’s home it has been for thousands of years

O
oscar
7 years ago

Time to work, Highways England cannot rely on corrupt influence any longer

N
Natasha Gabb
7 years ago

I oppose the option 5A route as well as the preferred northern route for the Chichester bypass. This desecration of the countryside must be opposed and stopped.

S
Samantha Standing
7 years ago

Protect the ancient woodlands and water meadows. No bypass, we have never needed it.

D
David Bailey
7 years ago

Better public transport which is more affordable NOT more roads for ever more polluting cars and lorries!!

J
John Binsted
7 years ago

There is no need to damage the natural and rural environment as there are far less destructive options.

C
Charles Perceval
7 years ago

Option 5A is worst most destructive proposal. On line with a tunnel under Hospital hill & Ford rd. flyover would minimise environment damage while avoiding delays.

C
Caroline Townshend
8 years ago

Please think again before destroying this beautiful area for ever.

J
Jane Hayward
8 years ago

Save our ancient woodlands. Without our woodlands, we wouldn't need roads because there wouldn't be any of us left...

P
Paul McCarthy
8 years ago

This was rightly stopped and put to bed years ago.. Whose (not so) bright idea was it to resurrect the bypass idea.

A
Adrian Mills
8 years ago

Protect the countryside, once it's gone it's gone !