Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
M
Mrs Sarah Ward
7 years ago
Please don't spoil ancient woodland, it's an essential part of history!
P
PA Rippingham
7 years ago
I broadly support the Option1 or Modified Purple Route, in either single or dual carriageway format, rather than the much more invasive wide diversion through open countryside to the south of Arundel.
The savings over Option 5A ought to be invested in steps (eg E-facing chord at Arundel Junction from Arun Valley to Coastway line) towards a much better and more continuous strategic railway network along the whole South Coast.
M
Moyra Simpson
7 years ago
This bypass is not needed. Let's protect our heritage and countryside.
R
Richard C Cooley
7 years ago
Arundel has a bypass, if that hasn't cured the problem than another bypass will not be a solution either.
B
Barry Hill
7 years ago
New roads only serve to increase traffic, not decrease it.
T
TRACY BEADLES
7 years ago
Highways England need to find better solutions before they destroy the entire green space in the UK. We have a very similar plight in Liverpool at Rimrose Valley http://chng.it/nxmVVPGxyT
L
Lynn Winnifrith
7 years ago
Unnecessary destruction of ancient woodland and wildlife.
S
Susan Haigh
7 years ago
Reject Option 5A. Option 1 new purple route is the only route acceptable.
K
Katharine Torr
7 years ago
Save the countryside and what lives there!!
C
catriona hunter
7 years ago
With only 2% of ancient woodland left in the country, Binstead Woods is invaluable not only for its biodiversity and services to humans and nature but for its , aesthetic, heritage and historical connections to the wider public. Its fragmentation will be devastating for everyone. It must be considered as worth saving a valuable asset like this in the face of dangerous changing climate.
K
Karen Wilson
7 years ago
Villages and surrounding countryside should be exempt from development. There is always a 2nd option taking into account the environment which is so precious
E
erica macdowell
7 years ago
This road would unnecessarily destroy an area of natural beauty. There are much cheaper options which would have far less impact on the environment. With more and more houses being built in the area we should be protecting these invaluable areas, not only for ourselves but also for future generations.
P
philip macdowell
7 years ago
We have been today for a lovely walk in the woods, crossing en route the line of the proposed road. Disgraceful proposal and a money better used elsewhere
J
jan
7 years ago
there is far too much ancient forest gone already please leave this intact for future generations.
M
Michael Wilkins
7 years ago
All in the cause of shaving 5 minutes off going to work ?
G
gary charles
7 years ago
for our childrens childrens sake please concider other options put forward
J
John Dougill
7 years ago
We need to preserve nature for the next generations, not continually erase and diminish it.
G
Geoff Staker
7 years ago
Best of luck in your efforts to halt the pernicious destruction of British heritage by Highways England's proposed A27 Arundel Bypass.
S
Sylvia Davidson
7 years ago
Any new road will be incredibly destructive for the environment. New roads just result in more traffic, so any forecast reduction in journey time never happens. Invest in public transport instead.
B
Brian Gill
7 years ago
Proposed option 5A, ill considered, hence subject to substantial criticism of judicial review.
Generally, unprofessional irresponsibility, as regards proper duties to our environment !
Please don't spoil ancient woodland, it's an essential part of history!
I broadly support the Option1 or Modified Purple Route, in either single or dual carriageway format, rather than the much more invasive wide diversion through open countryside to the south of Arundel. The savings over Option 5A ought to be invested in steps (eg E-facing chord at Arundel Junction from Arun Valley to Coastway line) towards a much better and more continuous strategic railway network along the whole South Coast.
This bypass is not needed. Let's protect our heritage and countryside.
Arundel has a bypass, if that hasn't cured the problem than another bypass will not be a solution either.
New roads only serve to increase traffic, not decrease it.
Highways England need to find better solutions before they destroy the entire green space in the UK. We have a very similar plight in Liverpool at Rimrose Valley http://chng.it/nxmVVPGxyT
Unnecessary destruction of ancient woodland and wildlife.
Reject Option 5A. Option 1 new purple route is the only route acceptable.
Save the countryside and what lives there!!
With only 2% of ancient woodland left in the country, Binstead Woods is invaluable not only for its biodiversity and services to humans and nature but for its , aesthetic, heritage and historical connections to the wider public. Its fragmentation will be devastating for everyone. It must be considered as worth saving a valuable asset like this in the face of dangerous changing climate.
Villages and surrounding countryside should be exempt from development. There is always a 2nd option taking into account the environment which is so precious
This road would unnecessarily destroy an area of natural beauty. There are much cheaper options which would have far less impact on the environment. With more and more houses being built in the area we should be protecting these invaluable areas, not only for ourselves but also for future generations.
We have been today for a lovely walk in the woods, crossing en route the line of the proposed road. Disgraceful proposal and a money better used elsewhere
there is far too much ancient forest gone already please leave this intact for future generations.
All in the cause of shaving 5 minutes off going to work ?
for our childrens childrens sake please concider other options put forward
We need to preserve nature for the next generations, not continually erase and diminish it.
Best of luck in your efforts to halt the pernicious destruction of British heritage by Highways England's proposed A27 Arundel Bypass.
Any new road will be incredibly destructive for the environment. New roads just result in more traffic, so any forecast reduction in journey time never happens. Invest in public transport instead.
Proposed option 5A, ill considered, hence subject to substantial criticism of judicial review. Generally, unprofessional irresponsibility, as regards proper duties to our environment !