Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
A
Andy McDermott
6 years ago
We need to reduce traffic not encourage it
M
Madeline Mythen
6 years ago
This cannot be allowed it is a crime against the countryside and it’s wildlife
C
Christine murrell
6 years ago
Countryside needs protecting
S
sandra Gear
6 years ago
Don't touch the natural water table..the meadows are there for a reason...
C
Cameron Syred
6 years ago
Arundel is a beautiful place and I want to keep it that way
D
David Tillson
6 years ago
Listen to the people of Arundel and if there is a more cost effective and less damaging alternative then it is a no brainer and absolutely should be the route to go with
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
This is a very special area of the country and its landscape needs to be protected. Watermeadows are really important features of river's s flood pains and need to be left intact.
I
Iris Marr
6 years ago
Too much destruction of wild AND semi-wild habitats will be the ruin of us all - eventually
S
Sophie Littlejohns
6 years ago
We must protect this beautiful natural area and our biodiversity
A
Anne Carey
6 years ago
If the money spent on roads was put into subsidising public transport, there would be less traffic on the roads, hence faster moving traffic, and not more destruction of the irreplaceable countryside, so necessary for the health of the environment
D
Dorothy Ferguson
6 years ago
For goodness Sake has anyone in the Government got any sense
Save our Country side
A
Alan Dixon
6 years ago
At some time in the future the importance of the natural environment will be recognised and schemes such as this wouldn't even get off the drawing board. Let that time be NOW! Just for once, let's take the responsible option PLEASE and go for the alternative route. Thank you.
D
Diana Marjorie Roddis
6 years ago
It is essential to keep certain parts of the environment.
S
Susan Battersby
6 years ago
We need the countryside to be protected.
D
Diane Wilson
6 years ago
This is a beautiful area historic and rich in wildlife and plants humans save don't ruin
A
Ann Greenfield
6 years ago
We must do all we can to protect our finite natural spaces. Choose a less damaging route
M
Mary Corin
6 years ago
No one needs a bypass around stunning and iconic Arundel. We need to tackle climate change NOW by discouraging endless road transport because of bad planning. Time for a new era where the car, lorry etc are socially unacceptable.
A
Anonymous
6 years ago
It is time to factor into road projects a financial cost representing environmental damage. Everyone hates the a27 but everyone also wishes to limit thoughtless and unaccountable damage to the ever depleting countryside. Leave a better legacy.
N
Nichola Johnson
6 years ago
There are better routes available that won’t destroy a village , tear down peoples homes and destroy long standing businesses. As a taxpayer l do not want my money spent on destroying binsted, so why is the council or powers that be insisting on going for the most expensive route? Backhanders going on here? If you are one the councillors feel very ashamed of yourself. Wish it was your village or town , house or business. Karma
S
Susan Martin
6 years ago
By destroying this area you are adding to the climate emergency, there must be an alternative
We need to reduce traffic not encourage it
This cannot be allowed it is a crime against the countryside and it’s wildlife
Countryside needs protecting
Don't touch the natural water table..the meadows are there for a reason...
Arundel is a beautiful place and I want to keep it that way
Listen to the people of Arundel and if there is a more cost effective and less damaging alternative then it is a no brainer and absolutely should be the route to go with
This is a very special area of the country and its landscape needs to be protected. Watermeadows are really important features of river's s flood pains and need to be left intact.
Too much destruction of wild AND semi-wild habitats will be the ruin of us all - eventually
We must protect this beautiful natural area and our biodiversity
If the money spent on roads was put into subsidising public transport, there would be less traffic on the roads, hence faster moving traffic, and not more destruction of the irreplaceable countryside, so necessary for the health of the environment
For goodness Sake has anyone in the Government got any sense Save our Country side
At some time in the future the importance of the natural environment will be recognised and schemes such as this wouldn't even get off the drawing board. Let that time be NOW! Just for once, let's take the responsible option PLEASE and go for the alternative route. Thank you.
It is essential to keep certain parts of the environment.
We need the countryside to be protected.
This is a beautiful area historic and rich in wildlife and plants humans save don't ruin
We must do all we can to protect our finite natural spaces. Choose a less damaging route
No one needs a bypass around stunning and iconic Arundel. We need to tackle climate change NOW by discouraging endless road transport because of bad planning. Time for a new era where the car, lorry etc are socially unacceptable.
It is time to factor into road projects a financial cost representing environmental damage. Everyone hates the a27 but everyone also wishes to limit thoughtless and unaccountable damage to the ever depleting countryside. Leave a better legacy.
There are better routes available that won’t destroy a village , tear down peoples homes and destroy long standing businesses. As a taxpayer l do not want my money spent on destroying binsted, so why is the council or powers that be insisting on going for the most expensive route? Backhanders going on here? If you are one the councillors feel very ashamed of yourself. Wish it was your village or town , house or business. Karma
By destroying this area you are adding to the climate emergency, there must be an alternative