Skip to main content

Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

2,356 Comments

A
Aaron Duke
5 years ago

Protect our natural beauty!

P
Phillip Watson
5 years ago

We have been warned about the effects of an insect catastrophe and how it inter relates with everything up the food chain. This Government MUST listen and MUST stop this meaningless road! How does this fit in with being 'Green' and reducing carbon footprints? It does not.

L
Leigh Rush
5 years ago

Stop building roads.

G
Graham Grimmett
5 years ago

See some sense and take another look at what you’re doing. Riding rough shod over every thing seems to be what happens . Why spend all that money on an enquiry?

D
David Johnson
5 years ago

This rich, glorious countryside should be part of the SDNP already, but is threatened by an unnecessary new road scheme that also severely damages communities for a hugely damaging road to stimulate developer profits. A much cheaper road adjustment would satisfy any traffic issues. This road is intended to encourage both additional road traffic when we need to be discouraging road traffic (from whatever fuel sources) if we are to respond to the climate emergency.

S
Stuart Richards
5 years ago

Gateway to the South Downs national Park and an area of ancient woodland that needs protection

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Another joke decision from those in power set to cream off lots of dosh in tax payers money. And those in power wonder why the public have no faith in the planners, councils and politicians anymore. Its stupid, expensive schemes like this that destroy wild places during a time when the environment needs to be put first that results in this. But no doubt some business group said its a good idea abd money talks. It always does. Short sighted, pathetic and a symptom of all that is wrong in this country. We are led by idiot's. Itsvtime for change!

K
Katherine Vidler
5 years ago

We need to protect our countryside for all the species that rely on it to live.

E
E Marshall
5 years ago

Arundel alternative seems like an eminently sensible solution, saves the environment and saves public funds which could be spent elsewhere on resurfacing smaller, potholed roads or improving local public transport.

A
Andrew Lewis
5 years ago

The bypass would unnecessarily harm a unique section of our countryside. If it goes ahead it would defeat the point of me travelling to the area as a tourist and I would holiday elsewhere.

G
Gemma trinder
5 years ago

Disgusting that this is even being considered! Where is the green recovery ?

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Please consider the alternative route suggested, as we will otherwise lose he preserved numbers of rare species of butterflies and the overall damage to the countryside will be far too great to validate any potential minor gains from the current proposed grey route.

V
Virginia M Cain
5 years ago

The need for another road should not take precedence over our natural countryside

T
Terry Allen
5 years ago

.

M
Martin East
5 years ago

We are going into a climate and nature crisis, we need to stop destroying natural landscapes.

R
Rebecca Hawkes
5 years ago

It's truly depressing that this monumentally destructive act is even being considered. It must stop.

T
tadhg wössner
5 years ago

makes me fucckin sick

K
Kev Harper
5 years ago

Another unnecessary bypass that will destroy so much important countryside while wasting millions of pounds of taxpayers money which could help fund the pandemic recovery.

P
Penny Philcox
5 years ago

We must stop destroying habitats in this way

P
Peter Marshall
5 years ago

We should be protecting these places.