Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside
2,356 Comments
W
William Young
10 years ago
Binsted is a rare survival of a traditional village area - it is similar to how parts of Kent were in the 1950's where I grew up, and must be preserved for the future.
R
Roger N Page
10 years ago
The traditionally rural area of Binsted is a worthy and much appreciated approach into the more formally designated SDNP and should be preserved.
L
Louise Williamson
10 years ago
Extra travel convenience is not worth the high price paid by the adverse impact on the environment of this beautiful area.
Q
Quentin Daniel
10 years ago
Would have a catastrophic effect on the countryside, and is unnecessary to boot!
P
Pauline Blumer
10 years ago
Walberton and Binsted will be badly and unnecessarily affected by the A27 proposal. There is a far better option.
I
Ian Powell
10 years ago
Addapt whats there , do not destroy what cannot be replaced
K
Karin Ryk
10 years ago
Our quiet villages must remain quiet and NOT sacrificed in the name of 'Progress'.
H
Hilary Escolme
10 years ago
I support this petition and all it stands for
M
marion claire jordan
10 years ago
This bypass would be a huge mistake and cause catastrophic devastation to our natural heritage!
J
John Harding
10 years ago
I do not want our village to
disappear, I support an online route.
K
Karen ward
10 years ago
We need an arundel by pass but not by destroying hamlets and villages
T
Timothy Ward
10 years ago
We regularly walk across the fields to Binsted Church or Pub and the woods beyond.
The setting of the church would be sadly diminished.
C
Chloe Wilmot
10 years ago
The minimum impact on the surrounding areas of the A27 is key to maintaining the Sussex countryside
D
David Childs Hopkins
10 years ago
I fully support this partition as I regularly visit the area in question
P
Paul Goddard
10 years ago
If we have to improve the A27 around Arundel it should with minimum disturbance to the Arun Estuary - No new bridge.
O
Olga Zenina
10 years ago
I want a partly-online option with a short bypass and anti-severance measures
J
John Amat
10 years ago
Utter rubbish to consider this route
J
John Small
10 years ago
I agree, there are better options such as thepartly-online option with a short bypass and anti-severance measures; this should be included in the public consultation.
H
Helga Dale
10 years ago
We should preserve our countryside and not spoil it by putting in more big roads
A
Angela crane
10 years ago
I live on edge of Binsted. It is a terrible idea to even consider this route
Binsted is a rare survival of a traditional village area - it is similar to how parts of Kent were in the 1950's where I grew up, and must be preserved for the future.
The traditionally rural area of Binsted is a worthy and much appreciated approach into the more formally designated SDNP and should be preserved.
Extra travel convenience is not worth the high price paid by the adverse impact on the environment of this beautiful area.
Would have a catastrophic effect on the countryside, and is unnecessary to boot!
Walberton and Binsted will be badly and unnecessarily affected by the A27 proposal. There is a far better option.
Addapt whats there , do not destroy what cannot be replaced
Our quiet villages must remain quiet and NOT sacrificed in the name of 'Progress'.
I support this petition and all it stands for
This bypass would be a huge mistake and cause catastrophic devastation to our natural heritage!
I do not want our village to disappear, I support an online route.
We need an arundel by pass but not by destroying hamlets and villages
We regularly walk across the fields to Binsted Church or Pub and the woods beyond. The setting of the church would be sadly diminished.
The minimum impact on the surrounding areas of the A27 is key to maintaining the Sussex countryside
I fully support this partition as I regularly visit the area in question
If we have to improve the A27 around Arundel it should with minimum disturbance to the Arun Estuary - No new bridge.
I want a partly-online option with a short bypass and anti-severance measures
Utter rubbish to consider this route
I agree, there are better options such as thepartly-online option with a short bypass and anti-severance measures; this should be included in the public consultation.
We should preserve our countryside and not spoil it by putting in more big roads
I live on edge of Binsted. It is a terrible idea to even consider this route