Skip to main content

Stop the Arundel Bypass - Save Arundel's Countryside

2,356 Comments

M
Marilyn Buckland
10 years ago

Very over due.

P
Peter Jones
10 years ago

The ecological importance of this area is valuable not least because of the fact that that such areas are rapidly declining south of the downs. The value of its inherent beauty and preservation of it the village lanes should be of the highest priority. This is an important site of ancient woodland, traditional farming, rural lanes, cottage economy and perhaps most importantly possessed of a spirit of place and poetic resonance that cannot be replicated. The 'feel' of Binsted is important and ancient.

T
Trudi Rogers
10 years ago

Obviously if there are less damaging options to the contryside, these should be explored. I believe this bypass should be used as a trunk route for all heavy traffic removing it from all the small country roads and not be run through any sussex villages.

N
Nick Solti
10 years ago

I grew up in Arundel and walk and cycle in Binsted to this day. It would be criminal to destroy this idyllic piece of English heritage.

B
Brian Torode
10 years ago

The Arun Valley and surrounding woodlands need to be saved for our children. Binstead and its environs is mentioned in the Domesday Book.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Be nice not to be held up so often...

J
Jenny Fox
10 years ago

Beautiful peaceful place to walk .Let it remain unspoiled

A
Anthony Hegarty
10 years ago

I fully support the petition and the suggestion that all other possible routes should form part of the consultation process to avoid desecrating Binsted Village.

D
Diane Steels
10 years ago

It's beautiful let's keep it that way

S
Sue Ashby
10 years ago

It would be sacrilege to destroy this place of peace and beauty to run a bypass through here. There are alternatives, use them!!!! It's time we protected what's left of our countryside and villages, wildlife too, NOT destroy it. I for one object to this and so should you !!!! Please !!!

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Dont want to see a rural community damaged forever nor wildlife disturbed.

J
John white
10 years ago

Brilliant alternative!

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

Rustington and Littlehampton were separate now because of housing they are joined and have lost their individuality. Please leave Binstead with its character alone.

D
Dennis Mounstephen
10 years ago

Thoroughly opposed to this latest idea; poor Binstead!!

C
Colin Hunwick
10 years ago

Please sort out this mess. With the trains unreliable and traffic so bad it is effecting my homelife

C
Cian cox
10 years ago

We need our countryside and traditional villages

J
John Shears
10 years ago

We most definitely need this By-Pass to reduce traffic congestion around Arundel and the A27

A
Ann Massingham
10 years ago

Once destroyed you cannot recreate. History is not a dead thing it lives through us. Let the future understand its past.

M
Mrs maureen LE ROI
10 years ago

THE route is inappropiate as it is highly damaging tothe environment , and would result in an unacceptable reduction in public benefit

C
CFR Noble
10 years ago

This would destroy the historic village of Binsted and Torrington. Other less damaging options should be considered.