A Bridge 2 Far

No, save our villages and protect the health of our children

I oppose all option C routes. All routes would devastate the only green land between Dartford and Medway

Please dont ruin our villages. With narrow country roads they cannot cope with a deluge of heavy traffic.

I oppose the proposal for a crossing outlined in option C

No to option C

LTC is a crazy idea

Air pollution.loss of our wonderful green belt and wildlife.wont stop all the traffic problems

Pollution,noise,extra volume of traffic on A2 which is already at grid lock now on most days. Our quality of life and value to properties will all suffer.

Pollution, devastated green belt and all that money just to save 14% of dartford vehicles 3 minutes travelling time. Need I say more,

We already have dangerous levels of air pollution. Knowing that more pollution would lead to more related deaths. Wouldn't that at least be multiple manslaughters?

This is a crazy idea

We have enough pollution no more needed we are way above legal limits

I am totally against a new crossing in Thurrock at the proposed location & the destruction of lots of Green Belt land. The proposed Option C crossing is the WRONG option and will NOT solve the congestion problems at the current Dartford/Thurrock Crossing! It is a HUGE waste of money!

I am against option C of the Lower Thames Crossing.

I live in Thong Lane and this will become a rat run for people avoiding the tunnel approach when it is congested. It will increase traffic and noise pollution in an area where there is already two major motorways and a major train link with London. I say NO!!

If this went ahead it would be the start of enlarging London. The area which is not concrete between the edge of London and the new road would get filled in. We need to accept that we are a small island that needs to control its population. there needs to be a policy that reduces the amount of traffic on our roads. this new road would generate a lot more traffic on roads leading to it which are already heavily congested. we all need countryside where we can get away from the pollution in big towns and cities.

There are so many fundamental issues here, including the short consultation period and lack of meetings in affected areas; the suspicious increase in cost of Option A and increase in Value-for Money attributed to Option C; the blight imposed on thousands of people; the fact that Option A has already appeared to be discounted; let alone the obvious disastrous impact to the environment, population, wildlife, ancient woodland, SSI's, etc - the list goes on and on. How can this be justified??!!

This option C is a joke, where are the effects on STROOD and Medway traffic, pollution and house prices factored in , we will bear brunt of traffic coming through our area that used to congest Dartford. Why isn't Medway and Strood on the maps?? Why just one open day in Rochester, it feels like a fix to destroy Medway

Say no to option c would loose my home it's a joke

We can't keep building more roads. We need to get freight off the roads by using rail and the river. We need to encourage employers with cash incentives to allow employees to work at home where possible. This would also help working parents.