Aesthetic requirements are a necessity to keep the historic or traditional nature and individualism of cities in tact. Aesthetic code and construction code are two separate but equally important items. Design matters.
P
Pam Thompson
7 years ago
This is intrusive overreach into cities’ and communities’ abilities to govern how they grow.
S
Shelley George
7 years ago
Please keep this decision at the local level
P
Philip Sanders
7 years ago
This bill will cripple city’s ability to promote quality development
G
G T Vick
7 years ago
Bad legislation. Let our locally elected officials serve and make decisions for our own town..... not The legislators in the capital!
J
John Nett
7 years ago
City Engineer, City of Buda
S
Steven Burts
7 years ago
Don't mess with my state or city!
J
James Collier
7 years ago
Our local standards must remain exactly that, local.
D
Dennis K Henning
7 years ago
Aesthetics matter to all of us who are in the design and construction professions (as well as to the common citizen). This appears to be a Bill that should be vetoed.
T
Travis Stacy
7 years ago
I live in a community that has high design standards and it shows in how developed we are. We as a community we have decided on how we want our community to look as we grow. And having those decisions made by the people living in the community is paramount to our success in the future.
J
Josh Selleck
7 years ago
no additional comment necessary, read the bill, think about how development works in cities, understand the negative consequences.
S
Sara Ambrose
7 years ago
The aesthetic look and feel in our community is most important to keeping the prominent people living here to still live here.
P
Phil Sypert
7 years ago
Veto this bill
D
Don Kiker
7 years ago
This proposal will kill the resell value on most of these planned communities.
T
Troy Dorman
7 years ago
This bill is a power grab by developers. Development does not lead to economic growth!
C
Chad A McCurdy
7 years ago
Please do not sign HB2439. This bill adversely affect our city and retroactively affects zooming already in place for years. We have had uproar in our city over allowing development already. We have tried to responsibly honor state law while respecting the wishes of our community.
J
Jay Martinp
7 years ago
This is a shortsighted measure.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Please do not sign a bill taking away the control of cities and towns to require materials that help make communities better places to live.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Please veto this bill. We need to allow city government to maintain their ability to govern their community.
R
Richard Lindsey
7 years ago
Deed covenants and building materials standards must remain as is with quality and restrictions in-place. Protecting our home investment and quality of life is a top priority.
Aesthetic requirements are a necessity to keep the historic or traditional nature and individualism of cities in tact. Aesthetic code and construction code are two separate but equally important items. Design matters.
This is intrusive overreach into cities’ and communities’ abilities to govern how they grow.
Please keep this decision at the local level
This bill will cripple city’s ability to promote quality development
Bad legislation. Let our locally elected officials serve and make decisions for our own town..... not The legislators in the capital!
City Engineer, City of Buda
Don't mess with my state or city!
Our local standards must remain exactly that, local.
Aesthetics matter to all of us who are in the design and construction professions (as well as to the common citizen). This appears to be a Bill that should be vetoed.
I live in a community that has high design standards and it shows in how developed we are. We as a community we have decided on how we want our community to look as we grow. And having those decisions made by the people living in the community is paramount to our success in the future.
no additional comment necessary, read the bill, think about how development works in cities, understand the negative consequences.
The aesthetic look and feel in our community is most important to keeping the prominent people living here to still live here.
Veto this bill
This proposal will kill the resell value on most of these planned communities.
This bill is a power grab by developers. Development does not lead to economic growth!
Please do not sign HB2439. This bill adversely affect our city and retroactively affects zooming already in place for years. We have had uproar in our city over allowing development already. We have tried to responsibly honor state law while respecting the wishes of our community.
This is a shortsighted measure.
Please do not sign a bill taking away the control of cities and towns to require materials that help make communities better places to live.
Please veto this bill. We need to allow city government to maintain their ability to govern their community.
Deed covenants and building materials standards must remain as is with quality and restrictions in-place. Protecting our home investment and quality of life is a top priority.