Bamiyan Cultural Centre: Revision Application of Competition Results
75 Comments
S
Sarah Abdelilah
11 years ago
unfair decision of jury
R
Roberto senes
11 years ago
the winner Doesn't respect the brief
K
Kef Kalon
11 years ago
If the competition is to embrace democracy and to be part of the cultural herritage of Afghanistan and particularly Bamiyan, how come the there is no public vote in the decision making process?
S
Simofilippi
11 years ago
The Jury members final decision should be revised!
D
Don Hanlon
11 years ago
This problem is common among large open competitions. One team writes a detailed and highly specific brief, then an entirely different group of judges select a winner on the basis of their prejudices, often entirely ignoring the brief.
N
Nick Roseboro
11 years ago
And now Dezeen
http://www.dezeen.com/2015/02/24/unesco-bamiyan-valley-cultural-centre-heritage-site-buddha-cliffs-afghanistan-winning-design/
P
Pierre-François Le Jeanne
11 years ago
+1
J
juan andres diaz
11 years ago
definitely the jury commited a mistake, thats the problem when the jury are not well renown architects
P
Paolo Venturella
11 years ago
what a shame !
Z
zoran
11 years ago
-
A
akasa
11 years ago
I totally agree with this declaration,UNESCO should review all proposals with deep consideration of real quality of each one.
N
Nick Roseboro
11 years ago
Article on Bustler
http://www.bustler.net/index.php/article/bamiyan_cultural_centre_competition_results_met_with_dismay
N
Nick Roseboro
11 years ago
Article on Archinect has been posted http://archinect.com/news/article/121435019/bamiyan-cultural-centre-online-petition-calls-for-jury-to-revise-winning-decision
N
Nanna Lyngø
11 years ago
I agree. If you don't fulfill the criterias you can't even be considered a participant.
G
Greg Gordge
11 years ago
It would seem impossible to democratically evaluate 1070 entries in one week. Once the number of entries was established - more time should have been taken by the jusry to evaluate these proposals. The second item in question is the notification process. No applicant was duly notified of the extension of the submission period to the 23rd January, or any further correspondence in terms of the process, winning entries etc.
E
EVA
11 years ago
Stubid project
A
Antoine JAUDET
11 years ago
The winner is not conform to brief of competition
T
Tommaso Raffa
11 years ago
"Many criterion and important facts have been neglected and ignored by the Jury members"
A
arnaud misse
11 years ago
The winning projects do not respect the specifications of the competition, they show a complete ignorance of the context and the local constructive cultures.
unfair decision of jury
the winner Doesn't respect the brief
If the competition is to embrace democracy and to be part of the cultural herritage of Afghanistan and particularly Bamiyan, how come the there is no public vote in the decision making process?
The Jury members final decision should be revised!
This problem is common among large open competitions. One team writes a detailed and highly specific brief, then an entirely different group of judges select a winner on the basis of their prejudices, often entirely ignoring the brief.
And now Dezeen http://www.dezeen.com/2015/02/24/unesco-bamiyan-valley-cultural-centre-heritage-site-buddha-cliffs-afghanistan-winning-design/
+1
definitely the jury commited a mistake, thats the problem when the jury are not well renown architects
what a shame !
-
I totally agree with this declaration,UNESCO should review all proposals with deep consideration of real quality of each one.
Article on Bustler http://www.bustler.net/index.php/article/bamiyan_cultural_centre_competition_results_met_with_dismay
Article on Archinect has been posted http://archinect.com/news/article/121435019/bamiyan-cultural-centre-online-petition-calls-for-jury-to-revise-winning-decision
I agree. If you don't fulfill the criterias you can't even be considered a participant.
It would seem impossible to democratically evaluate 1070 entries in one week. Once the number of entries was established - more time should have been taken by the jusry to evaluate these proposals. The second item in question is the notification process. No applicant was duly notified of the extension of the submission period to the 23rd January, or any further correspondence in terms of the process, winning entries etc.
Stubid project
The winner is not conform to brief of competition
"Many criterion and important facts have been neglected and ignored by the Jury members"
The winning projects do not respect the specifications of the competition, they show a complete ignorance of the context and the local constructive cultures.
I agree with the petition