OPPOSITION TO CONSTRUCTION OF A UNITED AUTO SUPPLY WAREHOUSE/DISTRIBUTION CENTER
203 Comments
W
Wendy Scalfaro
5 years ago
Stop the construction
A
Anthony Losardo
5 years ago
It’s only right
A
Anthony Monteleone
5 years ago
NO. NO, NO.
K
Kristen Burns
5 years ago
No.
D
Dan Stadtmiller
5 years ago
NO NO NO
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
No! Find another location- there are MANY abandon ones in the Syracuse area. Leave the people & wildlife in our area along: no more air pollution, no more increase & release of greenhouse gases, no more destructive or negative impact on surrounding wildlife. Go somewhere else!
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
No, thank you. There are other abandoned places this could go in. This will have a huge negative effect on the people of this community as well as the wildlife in the area. Greenhouse gases in our area will triple in a time where we desperately need to reduce them.
A
Angela Thomas
5 years ago
This is not acceptable. At a time when environmental conservation is of the upmost importance, we will not stand for another company coming in and destroy what little natural landscape we have left.
C
Cathy Walsh-Glowacki
5 years ago
Please do not allow this to be built in our beautiful community!!
R
Robert Cooney
5 years ago
Another 24/7/365 industrial facility such as the Budweiser brewery located in such close proximity to a residential community such as Baldwinsville is not what we need. The negative impacts on the quality of life for residents of the village and town far outweigh the economic benefits. Find another location.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
UA already occupies the old Penn Traffic (P&C) warehouse off 690 in Lakeland.... with an ideal location to access all major highways! seems every time I drive past, the parking lots are EMPTY....one would think they could retrofit the existing warehouse and better utulize their current operation. This qould be best as they wouldn't be abandoning one place just to disrupt the environment and agitate those opposed to build a new facility.. As someone stated before, why not Great Northern Mall?
K
Ken Bartelli
5 years ago
Not beneficial to our community
H
Heather Balch
5 years ago
Our beautiful community
V
Vicki Wallace
5 years ago
I am in opposition to the United Auto Supply warehouse at Rt 690 and Rt 48 for the multiple impacts it will have on this residential area.
P
Phyllis Brown
5 years ago
NO.....I do not want that facility a mile or so down 48 from me. I moved here years ago because it was a nice little village in which to raise my children. Now that Im retired, I sure as hell don't want to live near that noise and traffic!!!!!
D
Daniel Doerger
5 years ago
I am opposed to this development as it will lessen the quality of life in Baldwinsville NY.
W
William Balduzzi
5 years ago
Years ago a farm stand was in the same location and the Town had them close and remove the building due to the property not having access to the roadway. Why is this not the case anymore? That intersection is a hazard already without adding more truck traffic to the irregular 5 leg intersection. Residents in Lysander have been trying for 30 years to get water due to the area being known for having sulfer in the water, but now the Town is willing to bring water and sewer to the site. I do not want the warehouse.
W
William Balduzzi
5 years ago
Featured
Years ago a farm stand was in the same location and the Town made them remove the building and close the stand due to not being able to access the road from that property (without access). Why now are they able to build and have access on that same piece of property.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
This will create too much noise and traffic! It will be a burden to water and sewage system. It is near our homes that will bring down value.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Traffic in and around the town and village is already horrible! This would add to it.
Stop the construction
It’s only right
NO. NO, NO.
No.
NO NO NO
No! Find another location- there are MANY abandon ones in the Syracuse area. Leave the people & wildlife in our area along: no more air pollution, no more increase & release of greenhouse gases, no more destructive or negative impact on surrounding wildlife. Go somewhere else!
No, thank you. There are other abandoned places this could go in. This will have a huge negative effect on the people of this community as well as the wildlife in the area. Greenhouse gases in our area will triple in a time where we desperately need to reduce them.
This is not acceptable. At a time when environmental conservation is of the upmost importance, we will not stand for another company coming in and destroy what little natural landscape we have left.
Please do not allow this to be built in our beautiful community!!
Another 24/7/365 industrial facility such as the Budweiser brewery located in such close proximity to a residential community such as Baldwinsville is not what we need. The negative impacts on the quality of life for residents of the village and town far outweigh the economic benefits. Find another location.
UA already occupies the old Penn Traffic (P&C) warehouse off 690 in Lakeland.... with an ideal location to access all major highways! seems every time I drive past, the parking lots are EMPTY....one would think they could retrofit the existing warehouse and better utulize their current operation. This qould be best as they wouldn't be abandoning one place just to disrupt the environment and agitate those opposed to build a new facility.. As someone stated before, why not Great Northern Mall?
Not beneficial to our community
Our beautiful community
I am in opposition to the United Auto Supply warehouse at Rt 690 and Rt 48 for the multiple impacts it will have on this residential area.
NO.....I do not want that facility a mile or so down 48 from me. I moved here years ago because it was a nice little village in which to raise my children. Now that Im retired, I sure as hell don't want to live near that noise and traffic!!!!!
I am opposed to this development as it will lessen the quality of life in Baldwinsville NY.
Years ago a farm stand was in the same location and the Town had them close and remove the building due to the property not having access to the roadway. Why is this not the case anymore? That intersection is a hazard already without adding more truck traffic to the irregular 5 leg intersection. Residents in Lysander have been trying for 30 years to get water due to the area being known for having sulfer in the water, but now the Town is willing to bring water and sewer to the site. I do not want the warehouse.
Years ago a farm stand was in the same location and the Town made them remove the building and close the stand due to not being able to access the road from that property (without access). Why now are they able to build and have access on that same piece of property.
This will create too much noise and traffic! It will be a burden to water and sewage system. It is near our homes that will bring down value.
Traffic in and around the town and village is already horrible! This would add to it.