Keep Dundee Safe - Stop the Farnam Street Roundabouts (Victory by unanimous vote!)
247 Comments
L
Lynn Oldenhuis
3 years ago
Living at 49th Ave for almost 34 years, it is long past due for permanent 2-way traffic. The proposed roundabouts are highly unsuitable for our neighborhood. They will make our walkable community unsafe and will place many pedestrians and drivers in harms way. It will also cause major traffic issues. What about firetrucks and ambulances, how are they to quickly navigate a roundabout in an emergency? 50th and 52nd on Farnam are a major thoroughfare for rescue vehicles traveling North and South.
Traffic light timing changes have already made a significant improvement in driver and pedestrian safety, and are much appreciated. Let's keep the charm and safety in our neighborhood where it belongs.
W
Wach Roxanne
3 years ago
No roundabouts on Farnam!
H
Haysadelaide
3 years ago
I hate roundabouts they are clumsy and hard to negotiate
O
OBrien gloria
3 years ago
Round abouts waste of money. Just make streets two way all day.
P
Pursley Ronald
3 years ago
Please, just change Farnum to 2 ways all the time for 6 months. If there is a traffic problem then consider the roundabouts. There will surely be a traffic problem while the roundabouts are being built. DO NOT waste our tax dollars to fix a problem that likely does not exist.
E
Eisenhart John
3 years ago
5620 Jackson St
P
Price Terry
3 years ago
718 J E George Blvd
K
Kemp Emily
3 years ago
I do not support the installation of roundabouts on Farnam Street.
L
Lieben Anne
3 years ago
Featured
School children navigating the roundabouts on the way to and from school are a legitimate concern. Why not try Farnam with two way traffic for a period of a year before going to the expense and disruption to the neighborhood of creating roundabouts.
A
Ahlvers Jerry
3 years ago
I attended the meeting with 2 of our city council and many residents regarding the roundabouts. I don't understand why the residents don't have a say in the roundabouts. Someone said why can't they turn Farnam back to 2 way all the time and one of the City Council stated "That was not one of the options" That says the residents opinions of Dundee are not important.
I sincerely hope they keep that in mind when elections come up
J
Jones Eric
3 years ago
5001 Nicholas St
D
Dylan Gaillard
3 years ago
Keep Dundee walkable! These will be a nightmare for all of the children walking to school. Full-time 2 way and the red light delays are sufficient to solve our issues without any need for roundabouts.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
MAPLE ST
7828
M
Miranda McQuillan
3 years ago
This is a major street in the city, roundabouts are for neighborhoods. Treating it like it is a issue where you would reconstruct the entire street versus just change the flow of traffic to be more resident friendly, it seems like an over-correction on the part of the city council to try and relay that entire street. I always say be careful what you wish for though, look how involved they're getting in the situation instead of just dealing with the timing of those lights or listening to the public and the studies that have been done, still pushing to totally change the street. Sounds like a money situation to me. Who's benefiting from that construction project?
M
Marchello Linda
3 years ago
As a pedestrian, I can attest to roundabouts being unfriendly to foot traffic.
L
Luokkala Christa
3 years ago
There are way too many walkers especially children that will not be able to safely cross roundabouts in our neighborhood. The roundabouts will also destroy too much private property in both locations.
B
Burbach max
3 years ago
This is a bad idea based on the data, and unnecessary.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Roundabouts and pedestrians are always very tricky. With school kids crossing that street, a required stop at a red light gives kids a much safer chance of crossing than dealing with drivers who are uncertain about roundabouts.
The roundabout at happy Hollow leading into Elmwood Park is a good example. We use the roundabout crosswalk many times a week, and cars don’t always yield to pedestrians, or to traffic already in the roundabout.
The confusion in this situation would be amplified considerably by the weird lane shifts already happening on Farnam Street.
From what I have read, the light timing changes and work from home has decreased the number of people driving downtown, so it does not make sense to add roundabouts to the these intersections.
M
McClellan Kathleen
3 years ago
I do not support this proposal at all
K
Krueger Laura
3 years ago
I walk around my Dundee neighborhood multiple times a day with my small children. I also frequently go for runs, crossing Farnam several times. I fear trying to navigate a roundabout in the neighborhood, both for myself and with my small children. Please do not implement this project.
Living at 49th Ave for almost 34 years, it is long past due for permanent 2-way traffic. The proposed roundabouts are highly unsuitable for our neighborhood. They will make our walkable community unsafe and will place many pedestrians and drivers in harms way. It will also cause major traffic issues. What about firetrucks and ambulances, how are they to quickly navigate a roundabout in an emergency? 50th and 52nd on Farnam are a major thoroughfare for rescue vehicles traveling North and South. Traffic light timing changes have already made a significant improvement in driver and pedestrian safety, and are much appreciated. Let's keep the charm and safety in our neighborhood where it belongs.
No roundabouts on Farnam!
I hate roundabouts they are clumsy and hard to negotiate
Round abouts waste of money. Just make streets two way all day.
Please, just change Farnum to 2 ways all the time for 6 months. If there is a traffic problem then consider the roundabouts. There will surely be a traffic problem while the roundabouts are being built. DO NOT waste our tax dollars to fix a problem that likely does not exist.
5620 Jackson St
718 J E George Blvd
I do not support the installation of roundabouts on Farnam Street.
School children navigating the roundabouts on the way to and from school are a legitimate concern. Why not try Farnam with two way traffic for a period of a year before going to the expense and disruption to the neighborhood of creating roundabouts.
I attended the meeting with 2 of our city council and many residents regarding the roundabouts. I don't understand why the residents don't have a say in the roundabouts. Someone said why can't they turn Farnam back to 2 way all the time and one of the City Council stated "That was not one of the options" That says the residents opinions of Dundee are not important. I sincerely hope they keep that in mind when elections come up
5001 Nicholas St
Keep Dundee walkable! These will be a nightmare for all of the children walking to school. Full-time 2 way and the red light delays are sufficient to solve our issues without any need for roundabouts.
MAPLE ST 7828
This is a major street in the city, roundabouts are for neighborhoods. Treating it like it is a issue where you would reconstruct the entire street versus just change the flow of traffic to be more resident friendly, it seems like an over-correction on the part of the city council to try and relay that entire street. I always say be careful what you wish for though, look how involved they're getting in the situation instead of just dealing with the timing of those lights or listening to the public and the studies that have been done, still pushing to totally change the street. Sounds like a money situation to me. Who's benefiting from that construction project?
As a pedestrian, I can attest to roundabouts being unfriendly to foot traffic.
There are way too many walkers especially children that will not be able to safely cross roundabouts in our neighborhood. The roundabouts will also destroy too much private property in both locations.
This is a bad idea based on the data, and unnecessary.
Roundabouts and pedestrians are always very tricky. With school kids crossing that street, a required stop at a red light gives kids a much safer chance of crossing than dealing with drivers who are uncertain about roundabouts. The roundabout at happy Hollow leading into Elmwood Park is a good example. We use the roundabout crosswalk many times a week, and cars don’t always yield to pedestrians, or to traffic already in the roundabout. The confusion in this situation would be amplified considerably by the weird lane shifts already happening on Farnam Street. From what I have read, the light timing changes and work from home has decreased the number of people driving downtown, so it does not make sense to add roundabouts to the these intersections.
I do not support this proposal at all
I walk around my Dundee neighborhood multiple times a day with my small children. I also frequently go for runs, crossing Farnam several times. I fear trying to navigate a roundabout in the neighborhood, both for myself and with my small children. Please do not implement this project.