Oppose Statewide Property Taxes and State Control of Zoning
1,548 Comments
M
Mary Pat Tortora
5 years ago
NO to this mansion tax this is CT this is a middle to lower class tax
S
Steve Katz
5 years ago
We need to recall Lamont
A
Allen gregory
5 years ago
Are you people crazy!! CT. LOSING TAXPAYERS LIKE CRAZY AND YOU WISH FOR MORE TO LEAVE, CAUSE THAT'S WHAT THIS WILL ACCOMPLISH.
B
Bernard Armstrong
5 years ago
We are Greenwich residence and are totally opposed to SB171 to establish a STATE REAL ESTATE tax. The state iis loosing too many people now and this will only acerbate the problem
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
No more government control. Enough is enough
V
Vladimir lifshin
5 years ago
Featured
1. State Property tax will be another burden on CT retirees on fixed income.
300k assessed houses houses are modest dwellings in Stamford.
2. Zoning changes will have heavy negative impact on Stamford and drive people out of city and state.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
No more Tax Increases!!!
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
This bill is a new way to harass the middle class that is already suffering under the weight of the pandemic. It is virtually impossible to find homes in most of the state in a decent school district for under $300k. This bill therefore is a direct tax on probably every family. Further, this bill is in total violation of the principle of self-managment, ie.e allowing the towns to manage their own affairs. It is a direct attempt to take control away from the people and put it in the hands of a few (possible corrupt and vested people). This bill should be cancelled.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Please do not add to our tax burden making it more and more expensive to live and stay here. This additional tax would hinder our strong interest in economic growth in the area.... work on building business and other economic ventures in the area rather than penalizing us for living here.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
when will these
S
Stephen Ellis
5 years ago
To eliminate town zoning control is to disempower black and other minority populations who have property in those towns.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
I am FOR affordable housing and FOR inclusiveness and diversity but AGAINST the state's takeover of local autonomy. I stand against NEW taxes on the hard working people of CT.
A
Anthony Murljacic
5 years ago
Each town should control its zoning regulations.
P
Patty Gillen McQuail
5 years ago
No to statewide property tax!
J
Jeff valenzano
5 years ago
Try putting tolls back wake up
E
Elizabeth King
5 years ago
Strongly disagree with proposed zoning changes
P
Paige Couture
5 years ago
NO
L
Lori Brault
5 years ago
NO to a statewide property tax
B
Bill Drake
5 years ago
The tax in SB 171 will create conflict and inequity between those who pay and those who don't. SB 1024 is top-down and anti-democratic. In CT we do not appreciate Hartford's slur that we are racist. We aren't.
NO to this mansion tax this is CT this is a middle to lower class tax
We need to recall Lamont
Are you people crazy!! CT. LOSING TAXPAYERS LIKE CRAZY AND YOU WISH FOR MORE TO LEAVE, CAUSE THAT'S WHAT THIS WILL ACCOMPLISH.
We are Greenwich residence and are totally opposed to SB171 to establish a STATE REAL ESTATE tax. The state iis loosing too many people now and this will only acerbate the problem
No more government control. Enough is enough
1. State Property tax will be another burden on CT retirees on fixed income. 300k assessed houses houses are modest dwellings in Stamford. 2. Zoning changes will have heavy negative impact on Stamford and drive people out of city and state.
No more Tax Increases!!!
This bill is a new way to harass the middle class that is already suffering under the weight of the pandemic. It is virtually impossible to find homes in most of the state in a decent school district for under $300k. This bill therefore is a direct tax on probably every family. Further, this bill is in total violation of the principle of self-managment, ie.e allowing the towns to manage their own affairs. It is a direct attempt to take control away from the people and put it in the hands of a few (possible corrupt and vested people). This bill should be cancelled.
Please do not add to our tax burden making it more and more expensive to live and stay here. This additional tax would hinder our strong interest in economic growth in the area.... work on building business and other economic ventures in the area rather than penalizing us for living here.
when will these
To eliminate town zoning control is to disempower black and other minority populations who have property in those towns.
I am FOR affordable housing and FOR inclusiveness and diversity but AGAINST the state's takeover of local autonomy. I stand against NEW taxes on the hard working people of CT.
Each town should control its zoning regulations.
No to statewide property tax!
Try putting tolls back wake up
Strongly disagree with proposed zoning changes
NO
NO to a statewide property tax
The tax in SB 171 will create conflict and inequity between those who pay and those who don't. SB 1024 is top-down and anti-democratic. In CT we do not appreciate Hartford's slur that we are racist. We aren't.
NO to Senate Bill 171 taxes