Skip to main content

Oppose Statewide Property Taxes and State Control of Zoning

1,548 Comments

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

yet another ridiculous idea to devastate Connecticut’s competitiveness in attracting companies and jobs

J
James Hope
5 years ago

Statewide property tax and local zoning control is a huge mistake There are many different towns in Connecticut with differing needs and should retain control of their development and evolvement.

J
Judith and Ronald Murray
5 years ago

Enactment of these proposals would be a disaster for the state of c Connecticut and for its residents.

G
Geoff Smith
5 years ago

$300k is not a mansion. I don’t even think you can buy a house in Stamford for $300k, let alone a mansion.

G
Guobin Wang
5 years ago

I oppose SB171 and SB 1024. Every town is different. It is impossible for state to manage as local community。

J
Jose A Estanislao
5 years ago

Outrageous bill that must be opposed!!

D
David Detjen
5 years ago

The legislature and the governor should start exercising fiscal restraint (including renegotiating union contracts and pensions) rather than desperately trying to find new revenue sources to continue wild spending.

D
David N Feldman
5 years ago

Connecticut already pays some of the highest property taxes in the country. To raise and incur new taxes during a pandemic when so many are hurting financially is disgraceful.

J
Jeffrey orum
5 years ago

Oppose

A
Al Barone
5 years ago

Narrow-minded, self-serving, out-of-touch politicians performing at their very worst! Not at your service Mr. & Ms. CT taxpayer, not at all.

P
Pasquale Vairo
5 years ago

The proposed mansion tax is absurd on its face and would include most any residence in the state. It fails to take into account regional differences in home pricing and local property taxes. Let's not chase people out of the state. The Zoning proposal is also a set up for untenable overdevelopment and congestion wildly out of step with the character and infrastructure of small villages and towns. On the plus side, it may drive down local property values enough to avoid the ill-conceived mansion tax !!!! Please don't micro-manage local town governments.

S
Scott Waggner
5 years ago

State taxes are outrageous as they are currently.

C
Chuck Zeigler
5 years ago

Not fair!!!!!!

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

We are over taxed as it is in Connecticut and now you want to control local zoning? The state should not control what towns and cities can do.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Strongly oppose

K
Karen Weisberg
5 years ago

We all must do our best to stop this bill

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Bad idea! Maybe its time for Greenwich to secede from Connecticut. We send so much money to the state and receive little in return. Now the state wants to control how we live. If we were to secede we wouldn't need high state taxes and many of our wealthy residents wouldn't need to move to low tax states!

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

I am not happy with the way these bills have been drawn up. You are not thinking about the neighborhood and neighbors and the impact on them.

M
Mark Kaplan
5 years ago

I appose

J
Jorge Beristain
5 years ago

Who voted this change? Urban planning best left to their locally-elected governments! Big government STOP trying to take away people’s fundamental right to choose where and how they live!