Oppose Statewide Property Taxes and State Control of Zoning
1,548 Comments
M
Margaret and Joseph Gianquinto
5 years ago
We vote against SB 1024
P
pam karetsky
5 years ago
pls say NO to SN1024
K
Kim Crosby
5 years ago
I am opposed to this bill
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
For many, it's easier than ever to telecommute. These bills will drive taxpayers out of the state.
S
Stephen Zangrillo
5 years ago
I am against state control of zoning.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
I oppose this bill
H
Helen DeLago
5 years ago
We oppose SB 107 and SB 1024
H
Helen DeLago
5 years ago
I oppose SB 107 and SB 1024 please do not pass these proposals
Helen and Joe DeLago Old Greewnich
F
Florence Verrier
5 years ago
This would be devastating to seniors on a fixed income.
F
Frank Nash
5 years ago
Woke-ism run amok. State government is a financial and administrative disaster--why would we want the clowns in Hartford to run our towns?
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
this proposal would inflict significant cost and density to all of CT - which translates to higher taxes. CT can not afford to lose more people and jobs. Also - why would the terms be limited to specific areas of towns - isn't that discriminatory? are you suggesting that diversity is for in town only? access to areas which are less dense are not attractive to a diverse community?
J
Jack McDermott
5 years ago
oppose SB 171 & SB 1024
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
I OPPOSE THIS BILL!!
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Please vote against this bill
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
NO to SB 107 and NO to SB 1024.
G
Gabriela Hundorfean
5 years ago
Local zoning controls and local administration of property taxes best serve each community. Why change if it works!
P
Peggy Marx
5 years ago
Please do not pass these proposals. Listen to the people who oppose state control of zoning and property taxes.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
This must be stopped. Keep it local because we know our community best.
S
Sabine H Schoenberg
5 years ago
As a realtor who works across many CT communities, I strongly believe local zoning controls and local administration of property taxes best serve each community.
S
Scott Sternberg
5 years ago
I strongly oppose both bills. The state does not and cannot effectively manage the zoning decision process in local towns. Statewide taxing of real estate would be a first and continue to erode Connecticut's competitive position. Please stop the advancement of these bills.
We vote against SB 1024
pls say NO to SN1024
I am opposed to this bill
For many, it's easier than ever to telecommute. These bills will drive taxpayers out of the state.
I am against state control of zoning.
I oppose this bill
We oppose SB 107 and SB 1024
I oppose SB 107 and SB 1024 please do not pass these proposals Helen and Joe DeLago Old Greewnich
This would be devastating to seniors on a fixed income.
Woke-ism run amok. State government is a financial and administrative disaster--why would we want the clowns in Hartford to run our towns?
this proposal would inflict significant cost and density to all of CT - which translates to higher taxes. CT can not afford to lose more people and jobs. Also - why would the terms be limited to specific areas of towns - isn't that discriminatory? are you suggesting that diversity is for in town only? access to areas which are less dense are not attractive to a diverse community?
oppose SB 171 & SB 1024
I OPPOSE THIS BILL!!
Please vote against this bill
NO to SB 107 and NO to SB 1024.
Local zoning controls and local administration of property taxes best serve each community. Why change if it works!
Please do not pass these proposals. Listen to the people who oppose state control of zoning and property taxes.
This must be stopped. Keep it local because we know our community best.
As a realtor who works across many CT communities, I strongly believe local zoning controls and local administration of property taxes best serve each community.
I strongly oppose both bills. The state does not and cannot effectively manage the zoning decision process in local towns. Statewide taxing of real estate would be a first and continue to erode Connecticut's competitive position. Please stop the advancement of these bills.