Skip to main content

Rejection of RRC extension

103 Comments

H
Harish Bhoora
5 years ago

No

R
Rayhaan Mohamed
5 years ago

No to extension of Shelly street closure

I
Ijaaz Fakir
5 years ago

We oppose the extension

E
Este du Toit
5 years ago

NO to allowing TYTO complex to be incorporated into RRC

S
Susan Berry
5 years ago

NO to extend River Road closure

K
Kathleen Altria
5 years ago

Definitely NO the inclusion of the new development into River Road Enclosure

N
Nazeema Docrat
5 years ago

No to this proposal from 56 Bevan.

S
Shaun Corlett
5 years ago

NO from 49 bevan road. As per same reasons noted in summary and from other comments.

E
Estelle Dickason
5 years ago

No

S
Stefano D'Aguanno
5 years ago

No to moving the boom entrance to Shelly Street...

S
Sue Sitsakis
5 years ago

I am against extending the enclosure.

K
Kgomotso
5 years ago

We at 14B Shelley object to the proposed extension of the RRC enclosure.

N
Nick Tselentis
5 years ago

Unsatisfactory proposed arrangement. Bulk of traffic will go Gary St. ...these suburban streets not suitable for bulk traffic.

A
Andrew Timm
5 years ago

No to this proposal

S
Samuel Pillay
5 years ago

We reject the proposed offer to extend the River Road Enclosure.

S
Suzi and Michael Zive
5 years ago

Its a no from us at 51 Bevan. The compromise in safety, increase in area upkeep and management etc is not worth it even at full rates.

R
Ravin
5 years ago

No - added security concerns, damage to roads, increased monitoring and admin, property devaluation, increased traffic...

E
Eddie and Liz 23b river road
5 years ago

No from us at 23b river road to extending / moving the road closure.

T
Thabo Molekoa
5 years ago

35 River road

J
Jenny Orr
5 years ago

I firmly disagree to the inclusion of any further complexes into our security enclosure