The United Europe Forum addresses the below petition to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II of the United Kingdom.
Yesterday (23 June
2016) the Leave campaign narrowly won the referendum on the UK's membership in the European Union. This came
at the end of a bitter and divisive campaign in which pro-Brexit forces
consistently and (arguably) deliberately mislead the voting public with
statements which often stretched the facts or were in complete contradiction of
them. Furthermore, leaving the European Union is a decision the consequences of
which can be described, without hyperbole, as monumental. This was immediately
evidenced this morning by the crash of the Pound, which reflects investor
uncertainty in the UK's economic future. Leaving the European Union will
certainly have a severe impact on the UK in economic, political, social and
cultural terms. In fact, it is also highly likely that it will lead to the
dissolution of the UK, due to a renewed impetus for Scottish Independence and a
potential move for Irish reunification.
Given this context,
it is stretching credulity to label imposing such consequences on 48% of the UK
public as democratic. This is not, in general, something which could properly
be imposed on a country with such a narrow majority. It is regrettable that the
threshold was not set at around 75%, which would have been more appropriate.
That opportunity missed, we appeal to Your Majesty to exercise your
constitutional right to refuse
Royal Assent to Acts of Parliament and to apply this veto to any legislation laid
before Your Majesty which aims to repeal the European Communities Act 1972,
which enshrines European Union law into the UK legal system and facilitates UK
membership of the European Union. We acknowledge that there is a constitutional
convention which mitigates against such an action. However, in the view of the
undersigned, the current situation is so unprecedented and the potential damage
to the realm so grave, that in our view there is a strong argument that the
monarch has both the right and the duty to intervene on behalf of Her subjects
in this matter and at the very least, force a repeat referendum with a more
appropriate threshold which reflects the seriousness of this decision.
It appears that in many cases people voted from a position of 'uninformed' consent or crowd influence, without fully understanding the consequences for this and future generations. Also, it seems that the referendum should have been organized more fairly in terms of setting the minimum percentage margin for majority vote - to go through. It all feels too drastic a decision and the people are clearly not ready and confused. Therefore under the circumstances it would be right thing to do and only fair to call for a second referendum.