Send me as much factual information that you have. Hope i not to late.
C
Colleen Fleek
11 years ago
We moved to this area for the quiet country feel this neighborhood. We do not need a large apartment complex destroying our peaceful neighborhood with increased traffic. Plus the area schools are already at capacity and don't need more portals taking way the playgrounds.
P
Paul Larsen
11 years ago
Featured
As home owners in the 60th and Sorensen neighborhood we support what is laid out in this petition for guide lines for the development of the property at 60th and Sorensen. There are many problems with the developer’s (White Lotus) plans and the developer’s interaction with people living in the neighborhood. The developer has disregarded the input of the neighborhood and changed understood agreements with people living in the neighborhood. My wife and I have attended two meetings with the White Lotus (attended by 60+ and 100+ people) and no one supported the developer's plans for low income housing. Experience in the area with low income housing has been bad for the neighborhood in the past. There is no reason allow the opportunity to arise again.
B
Barbara K Robins
11 years ago
This developer has done more to obfuscate their goals than to communicate clearly with the neighborhood. Its increasingly clear they value only their bottom line and will tell us anything in an effort to misdirect for the purpose of getting our approval They should not be allowed to proceed with this project.
R
Rob Moline
11 years ago
I disagree with what this developer is doing.
G
GARY GOLDEN
11 years ago
NO
M
Michael Jones
11 years ago
Opposed to the lower income development by White Lotus Group
G
Gerald Curren
11 years ago
White Lotus is not being honest and we do not need low rent housing in this are. Also the wet area and ponds are a problem waiting to happen
M
Mark & Judy Harrington
11 years ago
Featured
Older rural area. High desity not a fit. Schools are full and traffic for schools is heavy now. Senior living was approved and agreed on. White Lotus changing again and trying to not inform neighbors.
B
BARBARA FIELDS
11 years ago
LOW INCOME HOUSING IS NOT A GOOD FIT FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD
A
Annette Jensen
11 years ago
I am in full agreement with this petition.
R
Randy Brungardt
11 years ago
I don't see how building high density low income housing will benefit this community. I have found this whole process to be slap in the face of this neighborhood. The bait and switch tactics of the developer and political figures in the have made me question the this process.
S
Sandie Mabbitt
11 years ago
Seniors will be around forever . and the turn over rate for apartments would be much lower because of the sustained income of SS
Send me as much factual information that you have. Hope i not to late.
We moved to this area for the quiet country feel this neighborhood. We do not need a large apartment complex destroying our peaceful neighborhood with increased traffic. Plus the area schools are already at capacity and don't need more portals taking way the playgrounds.
As home owners in the 60th and Sorensen neighborhood we support what is laid out in this petition for guide lines for the development of the property at 60th and Sorensen. There are many problems with the developer’s (White Lotus) plans and the developer’s interaction with people living in the neighborhood. The developer has disregarded the input of the neighborhood and changed understood agreements with people living in the neighborhood. My wife and I have attended two meetings with the White Lotus (attended by 60+ and 100+ people) and no one supported the developer's plans for low income housing. Experience in the area with low income housing has been bad for the neighborhood in the past. There is no reason allow the opportunity to arise again.
This developer has done more to obfuscate their goals than to communicate clearly with the neighborhood. Its increasingly clear they value only their bottom line and will tell us anything in an effort to misdirect for the purpose of getting our approval They should not be allowed to proceed with this project.
I disagree with what this developer is doing.
NO
Opposed to the lower income development by White Lotus Group
White Lotus is not being honest and we do not need low rent housing in this are. Also the wet area and ponds are a problem waiting to happen
Older rural area. High desity not a fit. Schools are full and traffic for schools is heavy now. Senior living was approved and agreed on. White Lotus changing again and trying to not inform neighbors.
LOW INCOME HOUSING IS NOT A GOOD FIT FOR THIS NEIGHBORHOOD
I am in full agreement with this petition.
I don't see how building high density low income housing will benefit this community. I have found this whole process to be slap in the face of this neighborhood. The bait and switch tactics of the developer and political figures in the have made me question the this process.
Seniors will be around forever . and the turn over rate for apartments would be much lower because of the sustained income of SS
I agree with the petition.
George L. Robinson