I live in this area to be away from this exact issue!
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
No to townhomes, yes to single family houses.
G
George Smith
1 year ago
Traffic and safety would be the results is allowed
S
Susan M Gonzalez
1 year ago
Enough!!!
E
Ed Crawford
1 year ago
Slow down the frowth in Cumming and no townhomes. It devalues our property
M
Margaret Higginbotham
1 year ago
Not in the best interests of our Milton Community. Much density for an already crowded area.
A
Andee peterson
1 year ago
No high density housing is needed in that area
R
Ryan Voisey
1 year ago
Please keep Milton rural and stuck with low density plans.
B
Briar Scott
1 year ago
Featured
The original charter of this area of Milton, (was Alpharetta in 2006 ) is to preserve and be low density. Townhomes in this area is high density and goes against this charter.
H
Heather Marie Weiler
1 year ago
Cmon Alpharetta please show you actually care about your tax payers as humans instead of collecting taxes
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
We dont need townhouses in this area. Very poor decision for the community
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
I oppose the building of this development. The reasons are clearly outlined in the brief.
N
Nonni Shore
1 year ago
Light industrial/residential zoning does not mean it needs to be Trashville. The entire strip of Hwy 9 from Windward to exit 14 looks like crap. Get hwy 9 completed and all secondary roads in good condition before you approve any new building. Get those gosh awful billboards off Hwy 9 and keep them off. Get every property owner on Hwy 9 to improve and maintain their property before you build anything else.
C
Christy Hayes
1 year ago
No high density development on this dangerous curve of Highway 9. Keep Milton Milton is what everyone on council runs on--keep your promises and vote NO.
M
Michael McAlpin
1 year ago
This type of high-density development should not be allowed in Milton
B
Brenda
1 year ago
No! Stop already!!!!!
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
Lake Laurel resident. Definitely a NO
M
Marco Pavia
1 year ago
Already overcrowded in this area, vote "No"
J
Jeanette LaForge
1 year ago
I live across from the Crooked Creek subdivision and it already backs up significantly on Hwy 9. In addition to the planned changes to Hwy 9 this would put a significant amount of stress on our infrastructure.
B
Ben Finley
1 year ago
I 100% oppose building this high density property adjacent to 5 acre road !
I live in this area to be away from this exact issue!
No to townhomes, yes to single family houses.
Traffic and safety would be the results is allowed
Enough!!!
Slow down the frowth in Cumming and no townhomes. It devalues our property
Not in the best interests of our Milton Community. Much density for an already crowded area.
No high density housing is needed in that area
Please keep Milton rural and stuck with low density plans.
The original charter of this area of Milton, (was Alpharetta in 2006 ) is to preserve and be low density. Townhomes in this area is high density and goes against this charter.
Cmon Alpharetta please show you actually care about your tax payers as humans instead of collecting taxes
We dont need townhouses in this area. Very poor decision for the community
I oppose the building of this development. The reasons are clearly outlined in the brief.
Light industrial/residential zoning does not mean it needs to be Trashville. The entire strip of Hwy 9 from Windward to exit 14 looks like crap. Get hwy 9 completed and all secondary roads in good condition before you approve any new building. Get those gosh awful billboards off Hwy 9 and keep them off. Get every property owner on Hwy 9 to improve and maintain their property before you build anything else.
No high density development on this dangerous curve of Highway 9. Keep Milton Milton is what everyone on council runs on--keep your promises and vote NO.
This type of high-density development should not be allowed in Milton
No! Stop already!!!!!
Lake Laurel resident. Definitely a NO
Already overcrowded in this area, vote "No"
I live across from the Crooked Creek subdivision and it already backs up significantly on Hwy 9. In addition to the planned changes to Hwy 9 this would put a significant amount of stress on our infrastructure.
I 100% oppose building this high density property adjacent to 5 acre road !