Pilsley Article4 Direction for Houses in Multiple Occupation
160 Comments
J
Josh Braddow
1 month ago
We don’t want it, simple!!
M
Mike Herbert
1 month ago
The people of Pilsley deserve to feel safe in their village.We don't want these dangerous people in our village.
S
Sally Hancock
1 month ago
Too many HMOs in anyone area affects the village feel and village community. Pilsley is a family orientated village.
S
Supporter
1 month ago
Any HMO's are not necessary in villages. You dont need a degree to know who is being housed in these either. They are not wanted in our villages. Keep our communities safe.
J
Jean Spray
1 month ago
Keeping local people safe
K
Karl Kimber
1 month ago
YOUR PUTTING MY CHILDREN SAFETY AT RISK.
L
lee lee collins
1 month ago
Because my daughter was one the girls who was followed my these men and since the incident she'snot been to park with her friends all the way throw the six week holiday's it scared that much
M
Michael Dillingham
1 month ago
No migrants
N
Nick Dawkins
1 month ago
Because we don’t want scrounging rapists in our village
E
Eileen Wyld
1 month ago
To keep our village safe.
J
Janis Rodgers
1 month ago
Featured
Couples who have grown up in the village are wanting to build a life and family in their childhood village and need housing to support them to do so. Locals should have priority of housing, funds should be spent on assisting locals young and old. Additionally the village has always been perceived as a safe community for all age groups and genders, this is and will no longer be the case as more properties become HMO's
M
Mr A Heath
1 month ago
Family & friends
P
Paul Kidd
1 month ago
Featured
The first priority for a local government is to create safe living communities for families to thrive.
HMO’s do not contribute to this basic need, history has shown they create very unsafe areas, causing distress and actual harm to existing residents.
A
Anamari Claxton
1 month ago
As we have seen through the media/press the amount of objections that small villages have raised none of us wish or want within our communities. We do not know their history and our village is not the right environment. Moving from a large city due to the quiet quaint living, is not vibe that we
are looking for. For some who wish to move this will down value properties and potentially unable to sell.
L
Lynn Hays
1 month ago
We have no idea who these people are and residents safety should come first and they should not be put in towns and villages to roam free.
T
Tina Ballo
1 month ago
Not appropriate use of housing when we have many homeless
D
Diane Leach
1 month ago
Why should we have these people living in our village
J
James Heath
1 month ago
No one what's them here it makes the village not safe for young girls and women
C
Carole Dykes
1 month ago
I don't feel safe when I go out walking anymore ,it affects my freedom to walk in my local area .
We don’t want it, simple!!
The people of Pilsley deserve to feel safe in their village.We don't want these dangerous people in our village.
Too many HMOs in anyone area affects the village feel and village community. Pilsley is a family orientated village.
Any HMO's are not necessary in villages. You dont need a degree to know who is being housed in these either. They are not wanted in our villages. Keep our communities safe.
Keeping local people safe
YOUR PUTTING MY CHILDREN SAFETY AT RISK.
Because my daughter was one the girls who was followed my these men and since the incident she'snot been to park with her friends all the way throw the six week holiday's it scared that much
No migrants
Because we don’t want scrounging rapists in our village
To keep our village safe.
Couples who have grown up in the village are wanting to build a life and family in their childhood village and need housing to support them to do so. Locals should have priority of housing, funds should be spent on assisting locals young and old. Additionally the village has always been perceived as a safe community for all age groups and genders, this is and will no longer be the case as more properties become HMO's
Family & friends
The first priority for a local government is to create safe living communities for families to thrive. HMO’s do not contribute to this basic need, history has shown they create very unsafe areas, causing distress and actual harm to existing residents.
As we have seen through the media/press the amount of objections that small villages have raised none of us wish or want within our communities. We do not know their history and our village is not the right environment. Moving from a large city due to the quiet quaint living, is not vibe that we are looking for. For some who wish to move this will down value properties and potentially unable to sell.
We have no idea who these people are and residents safety should come first and they should not be put in towns and villages to roam free.
Not appropriate use of housing when we have many homeless
Why should we have these people living in our village
No one what's them here it makes the village not safe for young girls and women
I don't feel safe when I go out walking anymore ,it affects my freedom to walk in my local area .
Some are ok but lots a drink and drugs