No more PFAS chemicals and why are we even considering this with a ban before the state senate?!
R
Rob
1 hr ago
I see a class action lawsuit on the horizon and state investigation for proper allocation of resources. Very shady stuff going on here with only one main winner.
H
Heather Carson
1 hr ago
Knowledge is power.
P
Pat Oakman
11 hr ago
Turf is dangerous.
K
katie green
12 hr ago
This huge expense could be going to something else educationally worth wild.
B
Bill Moore
12 hr ago
Natural turf is better
J
Jojo Monroe
14 hr ago
Wasteful spending. Unsafe.
S
Shane Schwarz
15 hr ago
Featured
The manner in which this proposal is being pushed through via a Trojan Horse by individuals with direct conflicts of interest with the proposed project. The very appearance of impropriety is enough to warrant alarm. To say nothing of the myriad additional concerns.
M
Mary Fleming
16 hr ago
Waste of our taxpayer money and dangerous!!!!
D
donald Barrigar
16 hr ago
Waste of money
J
Joseph Loveland
17 hr ago
We don’t need turf
A
Alice Jones
20 hr ago
We do not need turf if this small town more support for better education is much better than turf
J
Joe Armer
21 hr ago
Granville doesn't need artificial turf.
N
Nancy Rozell
23 hr ago
Featured
Totally unnecessary when attendance and participation is down, not to mention the safety concerns. Let’s find a more inclusive and educational endeavor to support!!
S
Sydney Rozell
1 day ago
Our kids health is more important than exterior athletic appearance.
D
Dan Shedd
1 day ago
Featured
There is no need for this project. Grass is safer and more environmentally friendly.
D
David Laird
1 day ago
Featured
It's unnecesary, less safe and the funds required may be spent on education and school buildings infrastructure.
T
Trevor McKnight
1 day ago
My home town and school that my sibling still attends. There are SEVERAL other issues at hand other than having artificial turf.
J
Jasmine Roberts
1 day ago
As others have said there are numerous reasons to vote no, from health concerns, longevity to player complaints(players don't like astroturf unless somebody is paying them to say so).
Test scores are below average and the push is for astroturf for a high school football team. Makes sense.
No more PFAS chemicals and why are we even considering this with a ban before the state senate?!
I see a class action lawsuit on the horizon and state investigation for proper allocation of resources. Very shady stuff going on here with only one main winner.
Knowledge is power.
Turf is dangerous.
This huge expense could be going to something else educationally worth wild.
Natural turf is better
Wasteful spending. Unsafe.
The manner in which this proposal is being pushed through via a Trojan Horse by individuals with direct conflicts of interest with the proposed project. The very appearance of impropriety is enough to warrant alarm. To say nothing of the myriad additional concerns.
Waste of our taxpayer money and dangerous!!!!
Waste of money
We don’t need turf
We do not need turf if this small town more support for better education is much better than turf
Granville doesn't need artificial turf.
Totally unnecessary when attendance and participation is down, not to mention the safety concerns. Let’s find a more inclusive and educational endeavor to support!!
Our kids health is more important than exterior athletic appearance.
There is no need for this project. Grass is safer and more environmentally friendly.
It's unnecesary, less safe and the funds required may be spent on education and school buildings infrastructure.
My home town and school that my sibling still attends. There are SEVERAL other issues at hand other than having artificial turf.
As others have said there are numerous reasons to vote no, from health concerns, longevity to player complaints(players don't like astroturf unless somebody is paying them to say so). Test scores are below average and the push is for astroturf for a high school football team. Makes sense.
It’s ridiculous!