Skip to main content

Opposing the Proposed Development at High Hill, Essington

136 Comments

R
Riva Eardley Verified
1 day ago

Wildlife is important and this would have a damaging effect.

L
Lynn Gibbs Verified
1 day ago

It will impact my family and grandchildren greatly.

M
Michelle Felton Verified
1 day ago

To stop SSDC from continuing to agree and approve housing development on rural green belt land that impacts on increasing traffic and flooding risks.

S
Supporter Verified
1 day ago

It’s taking too much green belt away and creates a strain on infrastructure

T
TRACEY BIRTLE Verified
1 day ago

Essington is too well built on already. Congestion at school, drainage issues, road issues all of the time (pot holes) through passing traffic. If they yes to this, then Essington will end up not being a village anymore. It will end up with more proposals. Good luck.

L
Louise Shore Verified
1 day ago

To support a friend who lives opposite,

A
Amanda Lawton Verified
1 day ago

Wildlife area where we walk will be seriously impacted. Used to be a village and now a huge development

G
GRAHAM Reynolds Verified
1 day ago

Essington has already had more than it's fair of local housing development with no improvement in amenities.

N
Neil Croft Verified
1 day ago

I live next to the pools and walk my dog around there 3 times daily, the amount of wildlife is unbelievable and having building so close by would disrupt all of the habitats in the area. Aldi I have to commute to work via high hill and the slightest disruption along that road has massive tailbacks and hold ups in all of the area. The road also floods in various places along the road quite several sometimes, without the field to soak up the rain water I fear the flooding would just get worse.

D
Dom Stanyer Verified
1 day ago

This is green space land and used by locals regularly. The roads are already too busy with traffic without adding to this with construction and additional residents

C
Clare Bickford Verified
1 day ago

Loss of nature & effect on the environment. Higher volume of traffic on the local roads.

S
Saul Grundy Verified
1 day ago

Wildlife

N
Nikki Wilkinson Verified
1 day ago

I grew up around this area and there’s new houses everywhere and it’s important to keep some greenery.

D
Debra Sifleet Verified
1 day ago

The infrastructure and the roads in Essington will not be able to cope with more housing, more traffic, more children wanting school places and more patients requiring doctors. High Hill and Upper Sneyd Road are already too busy with traffic and would become dangerous.

W
Wendy Mcandrew Verified
1 day ago

Appalled at yet another attempt to erode our treasured village status. This field is part of our community, a huge benefit to our mental health and wellbeing. Somewhere for future generations to explore and appreciate. Having relatives in Berkshire, I've seen absolutely no social housing or massive estates being developed there! Wonder why not? Once again, who is standing up for the people of the Midlands!!

R
Richard Robertson Verified
1 day ago

To many buildings on green belt land. We need to give Wildlife and Nature A chance. Without these the world is lost.

R
Roger Taylor Verified
1 day ago

Essington has seen enough development over the last 4 decades. It now needs to be left alone as one of the true small rural villages in Staffordshire . The infrastructure in the village struggles to cope as it is , the parking outside the local school is a very serious accident waiting to happen .

D
Daniel Bradburn Verified
1 day ago

Because turning nature into a concrete jungle is a disgrace

N
Neil Russell Verified
1 day ago

Infrastructure can’t handle it

J
Jackie Thomson Verified
1 day ago

Essington needs to protect its wildlife. Essington does not need anymore road congestion. Essington does not need ugly buildings to look at. Keep Essington GREEN.