Deny Proposal for R4 apartment complex near Heritage Park
39 Comments
M
Mary Johnsmeyer
2 months ago
Our family has lived in both The Reserve at Heritage and Nottingham at Heritage Park neighborhoods since 2003. Part of the appeal of living in this area are the open spaces. We’ve seen a lot of growth in the area during the past 23 years, and the current infrastructure barely supports the amount of vehicles and foot traffic between the green space and Heritage Park as it currently stands. Adding an apartment complex to 159th and Pflumm will exacerbate the already dangerous & busy intersection.
R
Robert Lucas
2 months ago
Too many to list
P
Pradeep Keshavamurthy
2 months ago
Oppose this proposed development plan.
A
Anna Nelson
2 months ago
To preserve the green space and due to significant concerns about infrastructure, especially due to Pflumm being only two lanes without shoulders.
L
Larry Peterson
2 months ago
Traffic and safety
S
Stacey Stitt
2 months ago
The area has grown so much and there is already over population in this corner and it’s still growing. It feels like extremely poor planning and greediness. Enough already.
D
Dawn Bainum Schrock
2 months ago
As a resident in the area this project will negatively impact the traffic, property values, and immediately more than double the community size.
B
Brooklyn Gormly
2 months ago
Our neighborhoods and roads cannot hold this additional traffic.
E
Eric Wheeler
2 months ago
Creates significant risk associated with increased traffic and architecture density issues. And will take away from qualities of the surrounding neighborhoods.
M
Megan Endres
2 months ago
This is an already very congested area for traffic and would not be suitable for the safety of all.
D
Darryl Guzman
2 months ago
Open space is important for us to keep. Additionally, I do not want an apartment complex nearby adding to traffic congestion.
S
Sally Eddington
2 months ago
Featured
I oppose the proposed R4 apartment complex near Heritage Park because I don’t think a high-density development is a good fit for this location. I’m concerned about the extra traffic and congestion, the strain on local infrastructure, safety, and the effect on the character of the surrounding neighborhoods and Heritage Park. I support responsible growth, but I think development here should fit in with the community rather than overwhelm it.
S
Susan Guzman
2 months ago
Featured
Our area has a lot of traffic as it is. I don’t want apartments to add to it. Also, the beautiful open spaces are disappearing which is so sad to see.
D
Denise Todd
2 months ago
Featured
Our home values are some of lowest in the Blue Valley School District. High occupancy apartments, literally in our backyard, drive property values down. Pflumm and 159th St would not be able to handle this huge influx in traffic. Apartment tentant turnover can also weaken a community. Renters don’t typically take the level of pride and care for the community as owners. Why the incessant push to develop every vacant plot of land? It’s ok to let some land remain green space.
R
Rachel Maier
2 months ago
Featured
City infrastructure is inadequate to support high volume apartment housing at this particular location. Traffic is already dense and dangerous at 159th and Pflumm and the streets struggle to accommodate the current amount of traffic. Also, we are concerned that it will negatively affect existing home values in neighboring subdivisions and introduce safety concerns for the neighborhood.
H
Hope Cortes
2 months ago
Featured
Too much traffic at an already congested area and no reason to get that green space such a cemented identity!
Our family has lived in both The Reserve at Heritage and Nottingham at Heritage Park neighborhoods since 2003. Part of the appeal of living in this area are the open spaces. We’ve seen a lot of growth in the area during the past 23 years, and the current infrastructure barely supports the amount of vehicles and foot traffic between the green space and Heritage Park as it currently stands. Adding an apartment complex to 159th and Pflumm will exacerbate the already dangerous & busy intersection.
Too many to list
Oppose this proposed development plan.
To preserve the green space and due to significant concerns about infrastructure, especially due to Pflumm being only two lanes without shoulders.
Traffic and safety
The area has grown so much and there is already over population in this corner and it’s still growing. It feels like extremely poor planning and greediness. Enough already.
As a resident in the area this project will negatively impact the traffic, property values, and immediately more than double the community size.
Our neighborhoods and roads cannot hold this additional traffic.
Creates significant risk associated with increased traffic and architecture density issues. And will take away from qualities of the surrounding neighborhoods.
This is an already very congested area for traffic and would not be suitable for the safety of all.
Open space is important for us to keep. Additionally, I do not want an apartment complex nearby adding to traffic congestion.
I oppose the proposed R4 apartment complex near Heritage Park because I don’t think a high-density development is a good fit for this location. I’m concerned about the extra traffic and congestion, the strain on local infrastructure, safety, and the effect on the character of the surrounding neighborhoods and Heritage Park. I support responsible growth, but I think development here should fit in with the community rather than overwhelm it.
Our area has a lot of traffic as it is. I don’t want apartments to add to it. Also, the beautiful open spaces are disappearing which is so sad to see.
Our home values are some of lowest in the Blue Valley School District. High occupancy apartments, literally in our backyard, drive property values down. Pflumm and 159th St would not be able to handle this huge influx in traffic. Apartment tentant turnover can also weaken a community. Renters don’t typically take the level of pride and care for the community as owners. Why the incessant push to develop every vacant plot of land? It’s ok to let some land remain green space.
City infrastructure is inadequate to support high volume apartment housing at this particular location. Traffic is already dense and dangerous at 159th and Pflumm and the streets struggle to accommodate the current amount of traffic. Also, we are concerned that it will negatively affect existing home values in neighboring subdivisions and introduce safety concerns for the neighborhood.
Too much traffic at an already congested area and no reason to get that green space such a cemented identity!
Not appropriate for the location proposed
Traffic, safety, infrastructure, maintaining neighborhood feel
I am concerned with the influx of students on our school system.