Why We Are Asking for a Review of the New Timetable
As 12th grade students, we are concerned about the impact of the new timetable, particularly the reduction from 80-minute lessons to 55-minute lessons and the simultaneous teaching of HL and SL students within the same periods.
Our concern is not simply that we prefer longer classes. It is whether shorter lessons are actually providing more effective instructional time. Transitions, setup and cleanup, interruptions, and managing separate HL and SL groups can take away valuable time that could otherwise be spent learning, practising, discussing, and receiving feedback.
This affects different subjects in different ways. Chemistry practicals require substantial time for preparation, experimentation, cleanup, and data analysis. Mathematics and Biology require enough uninterrupted time to cover extensive IB content while also practising exam questions and applying concepts. Art students need sustained work periods and opportunities for individual feedback from their teacher, while a highly constrained timetable can make both more difficult. English and Psychology also rely heavily on discussion and collaboration as part of the learning process. These are only specific examples, students across all subjects are experiencing challenges associated with shorter periods and divided instruction.
This is particularly concerning for 12th grade students because we are beginning our final year of the IB at a time when our academic performance has important consequences for our university applications. Grades from our first trimester contribute to the predicted grades that will be used in the university application process. Introducing significant changes to the way we learn during this period creates a risk that students' academic performance could be affected while we are being assessed under a system whose effectiveness has not yet been established.
We understand the reasoning behind the new timetable and the value of regular contact and continuity. However, we believe its effectiveness should be evaluated based on what is actually happening in classrooms. We are asking the school to consider student and teacher experiences and whether a modified structure, potentially including longer periods or more dedicated HL/SL teaching time, would better support learning.
Ultimately, our question is simple: Are we actually gaining effective and beneficial instructional time through more frequent, shorter lessons, or are we simply dividing the same learning into smaller pieces and losing valuable time every time we restart, transition, separate HL and SL work, or interrupt teaching?
9 Comments
We think is important the separation of the HL & SL groups. As well as the extended time for each class.
Allow 12th grade students to have enough time to learn and solve questions must be a priority not the teachers productivity
Supporting the students’ request and also aligned to our concerns as parents.
cus i go to this school
Last year timetable was much better and why change it in the last year of school as they know is more difficult.
The New schedule is damaging to our learning
School
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Copy link or share directly
Why We Are Asking for a Review of the New Timetable
As 12th grade students, we are concerned about the impact of the new timetable, particularly the reduction from 80-minute lessons to 55-minute lessons and the simultaneous teaching of HL and SL students within the same periods.
Our concern is not simply that we prefer longer classes. It is whether shorter lessons are actually providing more effective instructional time. Transitions, setup and cleanup, interruptions, and managing separate HL and SL groups can take away valuable time that could otherwise be spent learning, practising, discussing, and receiving feedback.
This affects different subjects in different ways. Chemistry practicals require substantial time for preparation, experimentation, cleanup, and data analysis. Mathematics and Biology require enough uninterrupted time to cover extensive IB content while also practising exam questions and applying concepts. Art students need sustained work periods and opportunities for individual feedback from their teacher, while a highly constrained timetable can make both more difficult. English and Psychology also rely heavily on discussion and collaboration as part of the learning process. These are only specific examples, students across all subjects are experiencing challenges associated with shorter periods and divided instruction.
This is particularly concerning for 12th grade students because we are beginning our final year of the IB at a time when our academic performance has important consequences for our university applications. Grades from our first trimester contribute to the predicted grades that will be used in the university application process. Introducing significant changes to the way we learn during this period creates a risk that students' academic performance could be affected while we are being assessed under a system whose effectiveness has not yet been established.
We understand the reasoning behind the new timetable and the value of regular contact and continuity. However, we believe its effectiveness should be evaluated based on what is actually happening in classrooms. We are asking the school to consider student and teacher experiences and whether a modified structure, potentially including longer periods or more dedicated HL/SL teaching time, would better support learning.
Ultimately, our question is simple: Are we actually gaining effective and beneficial instructional time through more frequent, shorter lessons, or are we simply dividing the same learning into smaller pieces and losing valuable time every time we restart, transition, separate HL and SL work, or interrupt teaching?
9 Comments
I sincerely believe shorter classes are a detriment to our learning. Not only in practicality as it prevents in-depth learning, conflicts with English essay practices and Chem or Bio practical labs, among other issues. But also from a psychological perspective, as a sudden change in a once well established routine, in students last and most pivotal year of learning, will only work against students learning. Overall, the change is unwelcomed, and works against student learning in every way.
We think is important the separation of the HL & SL groups. As well as the extended time for each class.
Allow 12th grade students to have enough time to learn and solve questions must be a priority not the teachers productivity
Supporting the students’ request and also aligned to our concerns as parents.
cus i go to this school
Last year timetable was much better and why change it in the last year of school as they know is more difficult.
The New schedule is damaging to our learning
School
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach 50 signatures.
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via .
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Share Petition
Don't stop at signing, share the petition link with friends to multiply our impact
Petitions like this
Other petitions you might want to support
Scan to share
Anyone who scans this can sign the petition.
I sincerely believe shorter classes are a detriment to our learning. Not only in practicality as it prevents in-depth learning, conflicts with English essay practices and Chem or Bio practical labs, among other issues. But also from a psychological perspective, as a sudden change in a once well established routine, in students last and most pivotal year of learning, will only work against students learning. Overall, the change is unwelcomed, and works against student learning in every way.